Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: conditions for release prior to conviction, including the imposition of bail (second consideration).
Constitutional amendments — Second consideration Court — Procedure Crime and criminals — Felony
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Adopted, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Explanation of Proposal
This proposed constitutional amendment, to be given second consideration by
the 2023 legislature for submittal to the voters in April 2023, was first considered by
the
2021
legislature in 2021 Assembly Joint Resolution 107, which became
2021
Enrolled Joint Resolution
6
.
Under the Wisconsin Constitution, a person accused of a crime is eligible for
release before conviction under reasonable conditions designed to assure the
appearance of the accused in court, protect members of the community from serious
bodily harm, or prevent the intimidation of witnesses. Such conditions of release
may include monetary bail only upon a finding that there is a reasonable basis to
believe that bail is necessary to assure the appearance of the accused in court.
This constitutional amendment provides that the accused is eligible for release
before conviction under reasonable conditions designed to protect members of the
community from serious harm as defined by the legislature by law, not just serious
bodily harm, in addition to the other conditions specified above.
The constitutional amendment also eliminates, only with respect to violent
crimes as defined by the legislature by law, the requirement that monetary bail may
be imposed as a condition of release before conviction only upon a finding that there
is a reasonable basis to believe that it is necessary to assure the appearance of the
accused in court. Instead, the constitutional amendment authorizes the imposition
of bail as a condition of release for persons accused of violent crimes only upon a
finding that there is a reasonable basis to believe that it is necessary based on the
totality of the circumstances, taking into account whether the accused has a previous
conviction for a violent crime as defined by the legislature by law; the probability that
the accused will fail to appear in court; the need to protect members of the community
from serious harm as defined by the legislature by law; the need to prevent the
intimidation of witnesses; and the potential affirmative defenses of the accused.
Procedure for Second Consideration
When a proposed constitutional amendment is before the legislature on second
consideration, any change in the text approved by the preceding legislature causes
the proposed constitutional amendment to revert to first consideration status so that
second consideration approval would have to be given by the next legislature before
the proposal may be submitted to the people for ratification [see joint rule 57 (2)].
If the legislature approves a proposed constitutional amendment on second
consideration, it must also set the date for submitting the proposed constitutional
Sponsors
Introduced by: Allen (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Dittrich (R) , Duchow (R) , Edming (R) , Gundrum (R) , Kitchens (R) , Knodl (R) , Krug (R) , Kurtz (R) , Macco (R) , Magnafici (R) , Michalski (R) , Moses (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Neylon (R) , Novak (R) , Ortiz-Velez (D) , Rettinger (R) , Rozar (R) , Snyder (R) , Sortwell (R) , Steffen (R) , Tittl (R) , Wichgers (R) , Wittke (R)
Votes
Assembly: Report adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 6, Noes 1
Passed 6–1 Jan 12, 2023 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 6, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Duchow, Neylon, Allen, Brandtjen, Dittrich, Edming, Gundrum, Kitchens, Knodl, Krug, Kurtz, Macco, Magnafici, Michalski, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Novak, Ortiz-Velez, Rettinger, Rozar, Snyder, Sortwell, Steffen, Tittl, Wichgers and Wittke; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Bradley, Testin, Felzkowski, Feyen, James, Quinn and Stroebel
- Jan 6, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Jan 10, 2023 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 11, 2023 · Assembly
- Jan 11, 2023 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 12, 2023 · Assembly
Representative O'Connor added as a coauthor
- Jan 12, 2023 · Assembly
Report adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 6, Noes 1
- Jan 12, 2023 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 17, 2023 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-19-2023 by Committee on Rules
- Jan 19, 2023 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly
Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1