Skip to content

Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session

SB 1006

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the wildlife damage abatement program and the wildlife damage claim program. (FE)

Animal Claims Collective bargaining County Damage to property Hunting Insurance — Miscellaneous Natural resources department of — Environmental protection Natural resources department of — Hunting and fishing

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes changes to the wildlife damage abatement program and the

wildlife damage claim program.

Wild animal removal

Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources may remove or

authorize the removal of a wild animal that is causing damage, including damage to

commercial agricultural crops. This bill prohibits DNR from issuing to a person a

bear carcass tag for the purpose of shooting a bear that is causing damage to

commercial agricultural crops.

Wildlife damage claim program and wildlife damage abatement program

Current law authorizes a person who owns, leases, or controls land on which

certain wild animals cause damage to crops or livestock (wildlife damage) to apply

to the county for wildlife damage claim payments and for wildlife damage abatement

assistance (wildlife damage payments). Wildlife damage for which a person is

eligible to receive wildlife damage payments includes damage caused by deer, bears,

geese, and cougars, as well as elk and sandhill cranes if hunting those animals is

authorized. Current law requires that, to be eligible for wildlife damage payments,

the location must be in a county that participates in the administration of these

programs. A county must apply to DNR to administer these programs, including in

its application a plan of administration that meets certain requirements. Once

approved, DNR provides funding to the county for the costs incurred in

administering these programs.

Under current law and DNR rule, a county pays 75 percent of the actual costs

of providing wildlife damage abatement assistance, for which it is reimbursed by

DNR, and the person receiving the assistance pays 25 percent of the costs. DNR pays

wildlife damage claims directly.

DNR administration

Effective January 1, 2025, the bill removes counties from the administration of

the wildlife damage abatement program and the wildlife damage claim program and

requires DNR to administer the programs instead. The bill specifies that, if DNR

provides wildlife damage abatement assistance to a person, DNR must determine

the actual cost of providing that assistance and pay 75 percent of that cost, leaving

the remaining 25 percent as the responsibility of the recipient.

The bill also eliminates the requirement under current law that a county

participate in the administration of these programs in order to be eligible for

reimbursement by DNR for the costs that the county incurs in processing and

donating venison from certain deer carcasses and in processing and donating meat

from certain wild turkey carcasses.

Wildlife damage claims

The bill increases from $10,000 to $25,000 the limit under current law on the

total amount that may be paid to a claimant for each wildlife damage claim. The bill

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Stafsholt (R)

1 cosponsors

Edming (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Sporting Heritage, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Feb 16, 2024 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Sporting Heritage, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Feb 16, 2024 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 7, 2024 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Stafsholt; cosponsored by Representative Edming

  2. Feb 7, 2024 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Financial Institutions and Sporting Heritage

  3. Feb 14, 2024 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 16, 2024 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Stafsholt

  5. Feb 16, 2024 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 16, 2024 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Sporting Heritage, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Feb 16, 2024 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions and Sporting Heritage, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Feb 16, 2024 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Feb 19, 2024 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Feb 19, 2024 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-20-2024 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Feb 20, 2024 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 20, 2024 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  13. Feb 20, 2024 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 20, 2024 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  15. Feb 20, 2024 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  16. Feb 20, 2024 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Mar 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Apr 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1