Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: abortion if the probable postfertilization age of an unborn child is 14 or more weeks and requiring a referendum. (FE)
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law regulates the performance of abortions in a number of ways,
including prohibiting the performance or inducement of an abortion, or an attempt
to perform or induce an abortion, if the postfertilization age of the unborn child is 20
or more weeks, except in the case of a medical emergency. Current law defines the
postfertilization age of the unborn child to mean the number of weeks that have
elapsed from the probable time of fertilization of a woman's ovum. This bill retains
that definition and amends the 20-week prohibition to prohibit any person from
performing, inducing, or attempting to perform or induce an abortion if the probable
postfertilization age of the unborn child is 14 or more weeks, except in the case of a
medical emergency.
Under the bill, as under current law, a medical emergency means a condition,
in a physician's reasonable medical judgment, that so complicates the medical
condition of a pregnant woman as to necessitate the immediate abortion of her
pregnancy to avert her death or for which a 24-hour delay in performance or
inducement of an abortion will create serious risk of substantial and irreversible
impairment of one or more of the woman's major bodily functions.
This bill requires a referendum before giving effect to the prohibition created
in the bill. Under the bill, at the April 2024 election, the electors would vote on the
question whether the statutory provisions treated in the bill shall take effect “thus
prohibiting under Wisconsin Statutes an abortion if the probable postfertilization
age of the unborn child is 14 or more weeks, except in the case of a medical
emergency?”. If a majority of votes cast in the election approves the question, the
prohibition takes effect on the day after the election results are certified. If the
question is not approved by a majority of votes cast, this act does not take effect.
Sponsors
Introduced by: Felzkowski (R) , James (R) , Knodl (R) , Stroebel (R) , Testin (R)
35 cosponsors
Armstrong (R) , August (R) , Binsfeld (R) , Born (R) , Brooks (R) , Callahan (R) , Dallman (R) , Dittrich (R) , Donovan (R) , Duchow (R) , Green (R) , Hurd (R) , Kitchens (R) , Krug (R) , Kurtz (R) , Macco (R) , Michalski (R) , Moses (R) , Mursau (R) , Nedweski (R) , Neylon (R) , Novak (R) , Oldenburg (R) , Plumer (R) , Rozar (R) , S. Johnson (R) , Schmidt (R) , Snyder (R) , Sortwell (R) , Spiros (R) , Summerfield (R) , Swearingen (R) , Vos (R) , Wittke (R) , Zimmerman (R)
Full history
- Feb 8, 2024 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Felzkowski, Knodl, Testin, James and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Nedweski, Rozar, Binsfeld, Dittrich, Duchow, Hurd, Armstrong, August, Born, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Donovan, Green, S. Johnson, Kitchens, Kurtz, Krug, Macco, Michalski, Moses, Mursau, Neylon, Novak, Oldenburg, Plumer, Schmidt, Snyder, Sortwell, Spiros, Summerfield, Swearingen, Vos, Wittke and Zimmerman
- Feb 8, 2024 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Constitution and Federalism
- Apr 15, 2024 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1