Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: the establishment of a family and medical leave insurance program; family leave to care for a family member and for the active duty of a family member; the employers that must allow an employee to take family or medical leave; allowing a local government to adopt ordinances requiring employers to provide leave benefits; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; providing an exemption from rule-making procedures; granting rule-making authority; making an appropriation; and providing a penalty. (FE)
Employment Family Insurance — Miscellaneous Ordinance Trust fund Workforce development department of
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Introduction
This bill does all of the following: expands the family and medical leave law to
allow an employee covered under that law to take family leave to care for a family
member and for the active duty of a family member; lowers the threshold number of
employees above which an employer must allow an employee to take family or
medical leave; and establishes a family and medical leave insurance program under
which certain covered individuals may receive benefits while taking family or
medical leave. The bill defines “family member” as a spouse or domestic partner of
an employee or self-employed individual; a parent, child, sibling, brother-in-law,
sister-in-law, grandparent, stepgrandparent, or grandchild of an employee or
self-employed individual, or of an employee's or self-employed individual's spouse
or domestic partner; or any other person who is related by blood, marriage, or
adoption to an employee or self-employed individual, or to an employee's or
self-employed individual's spouse or domestic partner, and whose close association
with the employee, self-employed individual, spouse, or domestic partner makes the
person the equivalent of a family member of the employee, self-employed individual,
spouse, or domestic partner.
Family and medical leave expansion
Under current law, an employer, including the state, that employs at least 50
individuals on a permanent basis in this state must allow an employee who has been
employed by the employer for more than 52 consecutive weeks and who has worked
for the employer for at least 1,000 hours during the preceding 52 weeks to take up
to eight weeks of family leave in a 12-month period for the birth or adoptive
placement of a child or to care for a child, spouse, domestic partner, or parent of the
employee or a parent of the spouse or domestic partner of the employee who has a
serious health condition and up to two weeks of medical leave in a 12-month period
when the employee has a serious health condition that makes the employee unable
to perform the employee's employment duties.
The bill expands the definition of “family leave” to include leave to obtain
services or care for, to move the residence of, or to prepare for a civil or criminal action
for an employee or the employee's family member who is a victim of domestic abuse,
sexual abuse, or stalking.
The bill requires an employer, including the state, to allow an employee to take
family leave for up to 12 weeks for the birth, adoption, or placement of a child for
foster care and up to 14 weeks in the aggregate for any kind of family leave. The bill
also allows an employee to take family leave as provided under current law to care
for a family member of the employee who has a serious health condition. In addition,
the bill requires an employer to allow an employee to take family leave because of any
qualifying exigency, as determined by the Department of Workforce Development by
rule, arising out of the fact that the family member of the employee is on deployment
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Agard (D) , Carpenter (D) , Hesselbein (D) , L. Johnson (D) , Larson (D) , Pfaff (D) , Roys (D) , Smith (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Wirch (D)
25 cosponsors
Andraca (D) , Baldeh (D) , Bare (D) , Billings (D) , C. Anderson (D) , Clancy (D) , Conley (D) , Considine (D) , Emerson (D) , Haywood (D) , Hong (D) , J. Anderson (D) , Joers (D) , Madison (D) , Moore Omokunde (D) , Neubauer (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Palmeri (D) , Ratcliff (D) , Shelton (D) , Sinicki (D) , Snodgrass (D) , Stubbs (D) , Subeck (D) , Vining (D)
Full history
- Feb 26, 2024 · Senate
Introduced by Senators L. Johnson, Roys, Carpenter, Smith, Agard, Spreitzer, Larson, Hesselbein, Wirch and Pfaff; cosponsored by Representatives Hong, Haywood, Joers, Conley, C. Anderson, Moore Omokunde, Snodgrass, Stubbs, Clancy, Ohnstad, Madison, Sinicki, Baldeh, Emerson, Neubauer, Shelton, Bare, Palmeri, Vining, Ratcliff, Considine, Andraca, J. Anderson, Subeck and Billings
- Feb 26, 2024 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor, Regulatory Reform, Veterans and Military Affairs
- Apr 10, 2024 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 15, 2024 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1