Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: broadband expansion grants for cities, villages, towns, and counties and telecommunications-related construction projects of cities, villages, and towns. (FE)
Data processing Public service commission Telecommunications
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes changes to the broadband expansion grant program that affect
cities, villages, towns, and counties (political subdivisions). Under current law, the
Public Service Commission administers the program and makes grants to eligible
applicants for constructing broadband infrastructure in underserved areas. The bill
allows a political subdivision to apply for a grant without submitting the application
in partnership with a telecommunications utility or a for-profit or not-for-profit
organization, which is required under current law. The bill also allows a political
subdivision to use a grant for the following purposes, in addition to constructing
broadband infrastructure: 1) planning related to broadband infrastructure
construction, including broadband feasibility reports; and 2) defraying no more than
50 percent of the cost of hiring and employing one broadband director.
The bill also eliminates a requirement for a city, village, or town to prepare a
report before constructing or operating a facility for providing to the public
telecommunications service, cable television or similar video service, or broadband
service. With exceptions, current law requires a city, village, or town to hold a
hearing before enacting an ordinance or adopting a resolution authorizing it to
construct or operate such a facility. In addition, at least 30 days prior to the hearing,
the city, village, or town must prepare and make available to the public a report that
estimates the total costs and revenues for the facility and includes a cost-benefit
analysis of the facility for a period of at least three years. Under the bill, a city,
village, or town is not required to prepare that report.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Mar 6, 2024 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Smith, Agard, L. Johnson, Larson, Roys and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Representatives Shankland, Ratcliff, Bare, Emerson, Joers, Moore Omokunde, Sinicki and Stubbs
- Mar 6, 2024 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Utilities and Technology
- Mar 11, 2024 · Senate
Representative Palmeri added as a cosponsor
- Mar 27, 2024 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 3, 2024 · Senate
Representative Madison added as a cosponsor
- Apr 15, 2024 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1