Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Senate Bill 1104

Regulating and addressing PFAS, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures and emergency rule procedures, granting rule-making authority, making an appropriation, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 11, 2024

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2024: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes to existing programs, creates new programs and standards, provides funding, and creates new positions to address perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

Groundwater standards for PFAS Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources maintains a list of substances that have a reasonable probability of entering the groundwater resources of the state and that are shown to involve public health concerns. The Department of Health Services recommends groundwater enforcement standards for substances on this list, which DNR then proposes as DNR rules in its rule-making process.

Read the full summary

The bill requires DNR to amend its rules to establish DHS's recommended groundwater enforcement standard for any PFAS as the enforcement standard for that substance. The bill exempts such rules from certain rulemaking requirements that would otherwise apply under current law.

Drinking water standards for PFAS The bill also requires DNR to amend its rules to establish DHS's recommended groundwater enforcement standard for any PFAS as the maximum contaminant level for public water systems and water suppliers. The bill exempts such rules from certain rulemaking requirements that would otherwise apply under current law.

Under the bill, DNR must also require public water systems and water suppliers to monitor for such PFAS in accordance with requirements under current DNR rules. The bill also requires public water systems and water suppliers to use certain specified treatment technologies as an interim best available technology to treat PFAS for which DHS has recommended an enforcement standard. Public water systems and water suppliers must also use laboratories certified to analyze drinking water to conduct required testing, and must use the method detection limit for reporting purposes.

Soil cleanup standards for PFAS Under current law, when a responsible party conducts a cleanup action to address soil contamination, the cleanup must be designed and implemented to restore the contaminated soil to certain designated residual contaminant levels or performance standards. Under the bill, DNR must require responsible parties to establish residual contaminant levels for the cleanup of contaminated soil and sediment, or select a soil performance standard, as a result of a discharge of any PFAS.

Emergency rules for PFAS The bill also requires DNR to promulgate emergency rules establishing acceptable levels and standards, performance standards, monitoring requirements, and required response actions for any PFAS that DNR determines may be harmful to human health or the environment in drinking water, groundwater, surface water, air (if the standards are needed to provide adequate protection for public health or welfare), solid waste and solid waste facilities, beds of navigable waters, and soil and sediment. These emergency rules must cover, at a minimum, PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, PFNA, and PFBS.

Rule-making exemptions for PFAS Current law requires an agency to suspend working on a permanent rule if it determines that the proposed rule may result in more than $10,000,000 in implementation and compliance costs over any two-year period. Current law also allows standing committees of the legislature and the Joint Committee for the Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) to review, approve, object to, or modify a proposed rule. If JCRAR objects to all or part of a proposed rule, that rule may not be promulgated unless a bill is introduced and enacted that authorizes the promulgation of the rule. In addition, current law allows JCRAR to suspend rules that have already been promulgated; if the rule suspended is an emergency rule, the agency that promulgated the emergency rule is prohibited from proposing a permanent rule that contains the same substance as the suspended emergency rule.

The bill creates exemption from these provisions for any proposed or existing DNR rule that establishes acceptable levels and standards, performance standards, monitoring requirements, or required response actions for any PFAS compound or group or class of PFAS in groundwater, drinking water, surface water, air, soil, or sediment.

The bill also exempts such DNR rules from the requirements under current law to prepare a statement of the scope of any proposed rule; to have the statement of scope approved by the governor; to hold a preliminary public hearing on a proposed rule if ordered to do so by JCRAR; to prepare an economic impact analysis of the proposed rules; and to prepare a report to the legislature of final rules.

PFAS community grant program The bill creates a PFAS community grant program, administered by DNR, to address PFAS. Under the program, DNR must provide grants to cities, towns, villages, counties, tribal governments, utility districts, lake protection districts, sewerage districts, municipal airports, schools, and daycares (municipalities). DNR may award a grant only if the applicant tested or trained with a PFAS-containing fire fighting foam in accordance with applicable state and federal law, or if a third party tested or trained with PFAS-containing fire fighting foam within three miles of a public or private water supply; the applicant applied biosolids to land under a water pollution permit issued by DNR; or PFAS are affecting the applicant's drinking water supply or surface water or groundwater within the municipality and the responsible party is unknown or is unwilling or unable to take the necessary response actions.

Under the bill, grants provided under this program may be used to do any of the following: 1) investigate potential PFAS impacts in order to reduce or eliminate environmental contamination; 2) treat or dispose of PFAS-containing fire fighting foam or fire fighting foam containers or purchase PFAS-free fire fighting foam; 3) sample a private water supply within three miles of a site or facility known to contain PFAS or to have caused a PFAS discharge; 4) provide a temporary emergency water supply, a water treatment system, or bulk water to replace water contaminated with PFAS; 5) conduct emergency, interim, or remedial actions to mitigate, treat, dispose of, or remove PFAS contamination; 6) remove or treat PFAS in public water systems in areas where PFAS levels exceed the maximum contaminant level for PFAS in drinking water or an enforcement standard for PFAS in groundwater or in areas where the state has issued a health advisory for PFAS; 7) sample and test water in schools and daycares for PFAS contamination; or 8) pay the costs of a mediator to negotiate between municipalities for an alternate source of clean drinking water.

An applicant for a grant under this program must apply on a form prescribed by DNR and must include any information that DNR finds necessary to determine the eligibility of the project, identify the funding requested, determine the priority of the project, and calculate the amount of a grant. In awarding grants under this program, DNR must consider the applicant's demonstrated commitment to performing and completing eligible activities, including the applicant's financial commitment and ability to successfully administer grants; the degree to which the project will have a positive impact on public health and the environment; and any other criteria that DNR finds necessary to prioritize the funds available for awarding grants.

The bill creates a sum sufficient appropriation from the general fund for this purpose.

County PFAS well testing grant program The bill also creates a grant program, under which DNR provides grants to counties to provide sampling and testing services to private well owners to sample and test for PFAS, nitrates, bacteria, and lead. The bill appropriates $2,000,000 per fiscal year from the segregated PFAS fund and creates one additional position at DNR for this purpose.

Aid for private wells with PFAS contamination The bill requires DNR to administer a program to provide financial assistance to municipalities located in an area where soil is contaminated with PFAS. Under the program, DNR would award grants from the PFAS fund to municipalities for eligible costs related to (1) construction of a municipal water system, (2) connection to an existing municipal water system, and (3) assisting owners of private wells, if appropriate, with the cost of installation of filters, remediation, or well replacement.

PFAS under the Safe Drinking Water Loan Program Under current law, the Department of Administration and DNR administer the Safe Drinking Water Loan Program (SDWLP), which provides financial assistance from the environmental improvement program to municipalities, and to the private owners of community water systems that serve municipalities, for projects that will help the municipality comply with federal drinking water standards. DNR establishes a funding priority list for SDWLP projects, and DOA allocates funding for those projects.

The bill requires DNR, when ranking the priority of SDWLP projects, to rank a project relating to PFAS in the same manner as if a maximum contaminant level for PFAS had been attained or exceeded, if DHS has recommended an enforcement standard for the type of PFAS involved in the project.

Products containing PFAS Beginning January 1, 2028, the bill prohibits the sale or distribution of certain products that contain intentionally added PFAS, including food packaging, cleaning products, cosmetics, and textile furnishings. The bill prohibits the sale or distribution of all products containing intentionally added PFAS beginning January 1, 2034. The bill provides certain exemptions to this ban, including by allowing DNR to identify, by rule, products in which the use of PFAS is an unavoidable use.

The bill allows DNR to require manufacturers to test certain products for PFAS.

A person that violates the prohibition on sales and distribution is subject to a civil forfeiture of $100 for each violating product, for each day that the violation continues.

Mediator for municipalities seeking alternate water sources due to PFAS The bill creates an option for DNR to appoint a neutral, third-party mediator to help negotiate between municipalities and responsible parties when one municipality needs to obtain an alternate water source or connect to a water source within a different municipality as a result of PFAS contamination.

Under the bill, the mediator may assist the parties in coming to an agreement or, if no agreement is reached, recommend a solution. The parties to the mediation are responsible for the costs of mediation, as determined by the mediator. The mediator may add additional parties to the negotiation if necessary, and DNR must provide the mediator with technical assistance.

PFAS-containing fire fighting foam appropriation Current law establishes a continuing appropriation from the environmental fund for the collection of PFAS-containing fire fighting foam. The bill allows this appropriation to also be used to provide assistance to local fire departments in replacing PFAS-containing fire fighting foam with PFAS-free fire fighting foam.

WPDES permit conditions Under current law, a wastewater treatment facility, and any person that wishes to land spread biosolids or other sludge, must obtain a water pollution permit (WPDES permit) from DNR. DNR is required to include conditions in such permits to ensure compliance with water quality standards.

Under the bill, a WPDES permit that allows the permittee to land spread biosolids must also include a condition that requires the permittee to test the sludge for PFAS, and prohibits the land spreading of the biosolids if PFAS levels exceed levels set by DNR in the WPDES permit. Additionally, a WPDES permit issued to a treatment work must require the permittee to test all sludge for the presence of PFAS and to report the testing results to DNR.

Access to information on solid or hazardous waste In addition, the bill requires a person who generates solid or hazardous waste at a site or facility under investigation by DNR to provide DNR with access to information relating to any transportation to or treatment, storage, or disposal at another site, facility, or location.

Proof of financial responsibility for PFAS contamination The bill also provides that DNR may, if it determines doing so is necessary to protect human health or the environment, require a person who possesses or controls or who causes the discharge of PFAS, or who manufactures products that contain intentionally added PFAS, to provide proof of financial responsibility for remediation and long-term care to address contamination by a potential discharge of PFAS or environmental pollution that may be caused by a discharge of PFAS. This financial responsibility requirement does not apply to a municipality, fire department, fire district, water utility, wastewater utility, agricultural producer, or the state.

Environmental justice impacts of PFAS transportation and disposal The bill requires a person disposing of PFAS, or transporting PFAS for the purpose of disposal, to attempt to the greatest extent possible to avoid disposing of PFAS in, or transporting PFAS to, any location where such disposal or transportation will contribute to environmental justice concerns and to consider all reasonable alternatives for transport and disposal of PFAS. The bill requires DNR to assist in evaluating the environmental justice impacts of a person's PFAS disposal or transportation.

Down Down /2023/related/proposals/sb1104 true proposaltext /2023/related/proposals/sb1104 proposaltext/2023/REG/SB1104 proposaltext/2023/REG/SB1104 section true Menu » 2023 » Related Documents » Proposal Text » SB1104: Bill Text × Details for PDF view Link (Permanent link) Bookmark this location View toggle Go to top of document Search in this chapter Search in this section Search in this agency Search in this chapter group Search in this chapter Search in this section Cross references for section Acts affecting this section References to this 1970 Statutes Annotations Appellate Court Citations Administrative Code Index Reference lines Clear highlighting $(document).ready(function () {

$('[data-toggle=tooltip]').tooltip({ container: 'body' });

});

Who's behind it

10 senators are its ⁠. All 10 are Democrats.

21 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 31 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (21)

What happened

  1. Apr 15, 2024

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 11, 2024

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy.

  3. Apr 11, 2024

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 11, 2024 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Pfaff, Agard, Carpenter, Hesselbein, L. Johnson, Larson, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer and Wirch; cosponsored by Representatives Baldeh, Billings, Palmeri, C. Anderson, J. Anderson, Andraca, Bare, Conley, Considine, Emerson, Hong, Joers, Neubauer, Moore Omokunde, Ohnstad, Ratcliff, Shelton, Sinicki, Stubbs, Subeck and Madison

  2. Apr 11, 2024 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Natural Resources and Energy

  3. Apr 15, 2024 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor