Skip to content

Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session

SB 28

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: classifying county jailers as protective occupation participants under the Wisconsin Retirement System and the treatment of county jailers under the Municipal Employment Relations Act. (FE)

Jail Legislature — Retirement systems joint survey committee on Public employee Retirement — Protective service Retirement system wisconsin

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, participants under the Wisconsin Retirement System

(WRS) whose principal duties involve active law enforcement or fire suppression or

prevention and require frequent exposure to a high degree of danger or peril and a

high degree of physical conditioning are classified as protective occupation

participants. Current law classifies police officers, fire fighters, and various other

individuals as protective occupation participants. Under the WRS, the normal

retirement age of a protective occupation participant is lower than that of other

participants and the percentage multiplier used to calculate retirement annuities is

higher for protective occupation participants.

This bill classifies county jailers as protective occupation participants without

a requirement that their principal duties involve active law enforcement or active

fire suppression or prevention. The bill defines county jailers as persons employed

by a county whose principal duties involve supervising, controlling, or maintaining

a jail or persons confined in a jail, regardless of whether the jailers have been sworn

regarding their duties or whether they serve on a full-time basis.

Under the bill, county jailers who become protective occupation participants on

or after the bill's effective date and are employed by a county that did not classify

county jailers as protective occupation participants on July 1, 2022, are required to

pay all additional employer costs resulting from their classification as protective

occupation participants, including the cost of the duty disability program. County

jailers who were classified as protective occupation participants before the bill's

effective date and county jailers hired on or after the bill's effective date in counties

that did classify county jailers as protective occupation participants on July 1, 2022,

are not required to pay the additional employer costs. The bill also allows a county

jailer to elect at the time of hire not to become a protective occupation participant.

Finally, under the Municipal Employment Relations Act, public safety

employees may collectively bargain over wages, hours, and conditions of

employment, and general employees may bargain collectively over only an annual

percentage wage increase that does not exceed the annual percentage increase in the

consumer price index. Under MERA, public safety employees and general employees

may not be in the same collective bargaining unit. The bill amends MERA so that

a county that treats a county jailer as a public safety employee on the effective date

of this bill shall continue to treat any person it employs as a county jailer as a public

safety employee except that, if the county subsequently raises a question regarding

the appropriateness of including county jailers in a collective bargaining unit

containing public safety employees, no person the county employs as a county jailer

may be treated as a public safety employee.

Because this bill relates to public employee retirement or pensions, it may be

referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Retirement Systems for a report to be

printed as an appendix to the bill.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Feyen (R) , Jacque (R) , Jagler (R) , James (R) , L. Johnson (D) , Marklein (R) , Smith (D) , Spreitzer (D)

47 cosponsors

Allen (R) , Andraca and Pronschinske , Armstrong (R) , Behnke (R) , Born (R) , Brooks (R) , C. Anderson (D) , Callahan (R) , Dittrich (R) , Donovan (R) , Edming (R) , Emerson (D) , Green (R) , Gustafson (R) , Jacobson (D) , Joers (D) , Kitchens (R) , Krug (R) , Macco (R) , Magnafici (R) , Moses (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Nedweski (R) , Novak (R) , O'Connor (R) , Penterman (R) , Petryk (R) , Plumer (R) , Quinn (R) , Ratcliff (D) , Rodriguez (R) , Rozar (R) , Schraa (R) , Shankland (D) , Snyder (R) , Sortwell (R) , Spiros (R) , Steffen (R) , Subeck (D) , Summerfield (R) , Tranel (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Wirch (D) , Wittke (R) , Zimmerman (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Mar 16, 2023 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Mar 16, 2023 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 3, 2023 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Marklein, Ballweg, Feyen, Jacque, Jagler, James, L. Johnson, Smith and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Representatives Born, Allen, Armstrong, Behnke, Brooks, Callahan, C. Anderson, Dittrich, Donovan, Edming, Emerson, Green, Gustafson, Joers, Kitchens, Krug, Macco, Magnafici, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, Novak, O'Connor, Penterman, Petryk, Plumer, Ratcliff, Rodriguez, Rozar, Schraa, Shankland, Snyder, Sortwell, Spiros, Steffen, Subeck, Summerfield, Tranel, Tusler, VanderMeer, Wittke and Zimmerman

  2. Feb 3, 2023 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. Feb 8, 2023 · Senate

    Representative Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  4. Feb 9, 2023 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 16, 2023 · Senate

    Senator Quinn added as a coauthor

  6. Feb 17, 2023 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Feb 28, 2023 · Senate

    Representatives Andraca and Pronschinske added as cosponsors

  8. Mar 10, 2023 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Marklein

  9. Mar 14, 2023 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  10. Mar 16, 2023 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  11. Mar 16, 2023 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  12. Mar 16, 2023 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  13. Mar 16, 2023 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  14. Mar 20, 2023 · Senate

    Senator Wirch added as a coauthor

  15. Apr 15, 2024 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1