Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: the number of signatures on nomination papers.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, generally, a candidate for a state or local office must file
nomination papers in order to have his or her name on the ballot. The nomination
papers must be signed by a certain number of voters residing in the jurisdiction of
the office the candidate seeks. For example, a candidate for a statewide office at a
spring election must collect at least 2,000, but no more than 4,000, valid signatures.
The filing official, typically the Elections Commission or a municipal clerk, must
determine whether the candidate has collected a sufficient number of valid
signatures to have his or her name on the ballot. If the number of valid signatures
is less than the minimum number required, the candidate is ineligible to have his or
her name on the ballot.
Under this bill, if a candidate submits nomination papers with more than the
maximum number of required signatures, but the filing official determines that the
maximum number of required signatures does not result in a sufficient number of
valid signatures, the filing official must review the additional signatures to the
extent necessary to determine whether the candidate has collected a sufficient
number of valid signatures to have his or her name on the ballot.
Sponsors
Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Cabral-Guevara (R) , Carpenter (D) , James (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Taylor (D) , Tomczyk (R)
21 cosponsors
Allen (R) , Andraca (D) , Bodden (R) , Brandtjen (R) , C. Anderson (D) , Cabrera (D) , Conley (D) , Gundrum (R) , Gustafson (R) , Jacobson (D) , Joers (D) , Krug (R) , Murphy (R) , O'Connor (R) , Ortiz-Velez (D) , Penterman (R) , Sinicki (D) , Sortwell (R) , Stubbs (D) , Subeck (D) , Tittl (R)
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Jan 11, 2024 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Jan 11, 2024 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- May 15, 2023 · Senate
Introduced by Senators James, Spreitzer, Carpenter, Ballweg, Cabral-Guevara, Taylor and Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives Ortiz-Velez, Sortwell, Subeck, Allen, C. Anderson, Andraca, Bodden, Brandtjen, Cabrera, Conley, Gundrum, Gustafson, Joers, Murphy, Sinicki, Stubbs and Tittl
- May 15, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection
- May 24, 2023 · Senate
Representative Krug added as a cosponsor
- Aug 15, 2023 · Senate
Representative Jacobson added as a cosponsor
- Nov 8, 2023 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Nov 8, 2023 · Senate
Representative Penterman added as a cosponsor
- Nov 9, 2023 · Senate
Representative O'Connor added as a cosponsor
- Nov 9, 2023 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator James
- Jan 11, 2024 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Jan 11, 2024 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 11, 2024 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 11, 2024 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Apr 15, 2024 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1