Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Senate Bill 325

The broadband expansion grant program. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 7, 2023. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 7, 2023

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Oct 17, 2023

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Oct 17, 2023

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2023 Wisconsin Act 77

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 7, 2023: “Published 12-7-2023”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes to the broadband expansion grant program.

Current law requires the Public Service Commission to administer the broadband expansion grant program, under which PSC designates as “underserved” areas of the state that are served by fewer than two broadband service providers and awards grants to eligible applicants for the purpose of constructing broadband infrastructure in underserved areas. This bill changes the purpose of the grant program to constructing broadband infrastructure in “unserved areas.” Under current law, “unserved areas” are areas not served by an Internet service provider (ISP) that 1) is a fixed wireless service or wired service and 2) provides service at actual speeds of at least 20 percent of the upload and download speeds for advanced telecommunications capability as designated by the Federal Communications Commission. The bill adds that, in order to not be an unserved area, Internet service must be available and reliable, and provided at no less than actual download speeds of 100 megabits per second and upload speeds of 20 megabits per second. The bill also allows PSC to adjust those speed standards every two years by rule if it determines there is good cause to do so in order to align with changes in technology and actual market conditions, in which case it must publish the adjusted speed thresholds on its website.

Read the full summary

Current law requires PSC to establish criteria for evaluating applications and awarding grants under the broadband expansion grant program and requires that the criteria give priority to projects meeting various standards, such as including matching funds and involving public-private partnerships. Under the bill, the criteria must require applicants to participate in the FCC's Affordable Connectivity Program or any federally mandated successor program. Under the bill, the criteria must give priority to projects with at least 40 percent matching funds and higher priority to projects with more than 40 percent matching funds. The bill changes a requirement under current law that the criteria prioritize projects in a large geographic area to projects in a geographic area that is difficult to connect. The bill specifies that the criteria must give priority to projects that are capable of offering service at actual download speeds of 100 megabits per second or greater and upload speeds of 100 megabits per second or greater, and higher priority to projects capable of exceeding the minimum speeds just described.

Current law requires PSC to consider certain factors when evaluating an application under the broadband expansion grant program. This bill adds that PSC must consider whether the applicant offers a low-cost broadband service option in order to be eligible for funding under the federal Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program or participates in the FCC's Affordable Connectivity Program or any federally mandated successor program.

The bill adds a procedure by which an ISP in or near a project area proposed in an application for a broadband expansion grant may challenge the awarding of that grant. An ISP may challenge the grant if that ISP currently provides available and reliable fixed wireless or wired broadband service to the project area at minimum download and upload speeds or if that ISP commits to completing construction of broadband infrastructure and providing available and reliable broadband service to the project area at minimum download and upload speeds no later than 24 months after the date of the PSC order awarding grants. The bill requires PSC to evaluate the challenge and prohibits it from funding any portion of a project relating to the area that is the subject of the challenge if it determines as credible the challenging ISP's commitment to provide broadband service that meets the requirements. If PSC denies funding as a result of such a challenge and the ISP does not fulfill its commitment, PSC is prohibited from awarding grant funding to that ISP and the ISP is prohibited from participating in the challenge process for the following two grant cycles.

Who's behind it

9 senators are its ⁠. 8 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

30 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 39 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (30)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Utilities and Technology vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 6, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Utilities and Technology vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 6, 2023

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Utilities and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 7, 2023

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 7, 2023

    The governor signed it. It became 2023 Wisconsin Act 77.

  3. Nov 30, 2023

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Oct 17, 2023

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Oct 17, 2023

    “Read” (the official wording)

  6. Oct 17, 2023

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Oct 17, 2023

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Oct 17, 2023

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Oct 17, 2023

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  10. Oct 6, 2023

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  11. Oct 6, 2023

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Oct 6, 2023

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  13. Sep 28, 2023

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jun 21, 2023 to Sep 8, 2023

    2 more representatives and 1 senator signed on in support.

  15. Jun 13, 2023

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Jun 7, 2023

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Utilities and Technology.

  17. Jun 7, 2023

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Marklein, Ballweg, Felzkowski, Feyen, James, Pfaff, Testin, Wimberger and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Summerfield, Swearingen, Armstrong, Binsfeld, Callahan, Considine, Edming, Green, Hurd, S. Johnson, Kitchens, Magnafici, Mursau, Novak, O'Connor, Penterman, Plumer, Pronschinske, Sapik, Schmidt, Schraa, Tranel, Tusler, Sinicki and Conley

  2. Jun 7, 2023 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Utilities and Technology

  3. Jun 13, 2023 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 21, 2023 · Senate

    Representative Subeck added as a cosponsor

  5. Jun 22, 2023 · Senate

    Senator Stafsholt added as a coauthor

  6. Sep 8, 2023 · Senate

    Representative Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  7. Sep 13, 2023 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Marklein

  8. Sep 28, 2023 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  9. Oct 5, 2023 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Oct 6, 2023 · Senate

    Representative Joers added as a cosponsor

  11. Oct 6, 2023 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Oct 6, 2023 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Utilities and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Oct 6, 2023 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  14. Oct 16, 2023 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-17-2023 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  15. Oct 16, 2023 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)

  16. Oct 17, 2023 · Senate

    Representative Steffen added as a cosponsor

  17. Oct 17, 2023 · Senate

    Read a second time

  18. Oct 17, 2023 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  19. Oct 17, 2023 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Oct 17, 2023 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  21. Oct 17, 2023 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  22. Oct 17, 2023 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  23. Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  24. Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Read

  25. Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from Senate message and take up

  26. Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  27. Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  29. Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  30. Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Oct 18, 2023 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  32. Oct 19, 2023 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)

  33. Oct 19, 2023 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  34. Nov 30, 2023 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-30-2023

  35. Dec 7, 2023 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-6-2023. 2023 Wisconsin Act 77

  36. Dec 7, 2023 · Senate

    Published 12-7-2023

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote