Senate Bill 325
The broadband expansion grant program. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Dec 7, 2023. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jun 7, 2023
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Oct 17, 2023
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Oct 17, 2023
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2023 Wisconsin Act 77
Latest entry in the official record, Dec 7, 2023: “Published 12-7-2023”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes various changes to the broadband expansion grant program.
Current law requires the Public Service Commission to administer the broadband expansion grant program, under which PSC designates as “underserved” areas of the state that are served by fewer than two broadband service providers and awards grants to eligible applicants for the purpose of constructing broadband infrastructure in underserved areas. This bill changes the purpose of the grant program to constructing broadband infrastructure in “unserved areas.” Under current law, “unserved areas” are areas not served by an Internet service provider (ISP) that 1) is a fixed wireless service or wired service and 2) provides service at actual speeds of at least 20 percent of the upload and download speeds for advanced telecommunications capability as designated by the Federal Communications Commission. The bill adds that, in order to not be an unserved area, Internet service must be available and reliable, and provided at no less than actual download speeds of 100 megabits per second and upload speeds of 20 megabits per second. The bill also allows PSC to adjust those speed standards every two years by rule if it determines there is good cause to do so in order to align with changes in technology and actual market conditions, in which case it must publish the adjusted speed thresholds on its website.
Read the full summary Show less
Current law requires PSC to establish criteria for evaluating applications and awarding grants under the broadband expansion grant program and requires that the criteria give priority to projects meeting various standards, such as including matching funds and involving public-private partnerships. Under the bill, the criteria must require applicants to participate in the FCC's Affordable Connectivity Program or any federally mandated successor program. Under the bill, the criteria must give priority to projects with at least 40 percent matching funds and higher priority to projects with more than 40 percent matching funds. The bill changes a requirement under current law that the criteria prioritize projects in a large geographic area to projects in a geographic area that is difficult to connect. The bill specifies that the criteria must give priority to projects that are capable of offering service at actual download speeds of 100 megabits per second or greater and upload speeds of 100 megabits per second or greater, and higher priority to projects capable of exceeding the minimum speeds just described.
Current law requires PSC to consider certain factors when evaluating an application under the broadband expansion grant program. This bill adds that PSC must consider whether the applicant offers a low-cost broadband service option in order to be eligible for funding under the federal Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program or participates in the FCC's Affordable Connectivity Program or any federally mandated successor program.
The bill adds a procedure by which an ISP in or near a project area proposed in an application for a broadband expansion grant may challenge the awarding of that grant. An ISP may challenge the grant if that ISP currently provides available and reliable fixed wireless or wired broadband service to the project area at minimum download and upload speeds or if that ISP commits to completing construction of broadband infrastructure and providing available and reliable broadband service to the project area at minimum download and upload speeds no later than 24 months after the date of the PSC order awarding grants. The bill requires PSC to evaluate the challenge and prohibits it from funding any portion of a project relating to the area that is the subject of the challenge if it determines as credible the challenging ISP's commitment to provide broadband service that meets the requirements. If PSC denies funding as a result of such a challenge and the ISP does not fulfill its commitment, PSC is prohibited from awarding grant funding to that ISP and the ISP is prohibited from participating in the challenge process for the following two grant cycles.
Who's behind it
9 senators are its . 8 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
30 more lawmakers .
See all 39 names Hide the names
Authors (9)
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Mary Felzkowski · Republican, Senate
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
- Jesse James · Republican, Senate
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Brad Pfaff · Democrat, Senate
- Patrick Testin · Republican, Senate
- Van Wanggaard · Republican, Senate
- Eric Wimberger · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (30)
- Dave Armstrong · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Binsfeld · Republican, Assembly
- Calvin Callahan · Republican, Assembly
- Sue Conley · Democrat, Assembly
- Dave Considine · Democrat, Assembly
- James Edming · Republican, Assembly
- Chanz Green · Republican, Assembly
- Karen Hurd · Republican, Assembly
- Jenna Jacobson · Democrat, Assembly
- Alex Joers · Democrat, Assembly
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Gae Magnafici · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Todd Novak · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Will Penterman · Republican, Assembly
- Jon Plumer · Republican, Assembly
- Treig Pronschinske · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Johnson · Republican, Assembly
- Angie Sapik · Republican, Assembly
- Peter Schmidt · Republican, Assembly
- Michael Schraa · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Rob Stafsholt · Republican, Senate
- David Steffen · Republican, Assembly
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
- Rob Summerfield · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Swearingen · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Utilities and Technology vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 6, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Utilities and Technology vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 6, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Utilities and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Dec 7, 2023
The new law was published.
-
Dec 7, 2023
The governor signed it. It became 2023 Wisconsin Act 77.
-
Nov 30, 2023
Sent to the governor.
-
Oct 17, 2023
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Oct 17, 2023
“Read” (the official wording)
-
Oct 17, 2023
The Assembly received it.
-
Oct 17, 2023
The Senate passed it.
-
Oct 17, 2023
The Senate adopted it.
-
Oct 17, 2023
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Oct 6, 2023
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Oct 6, 2023
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 6, 2023
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Sep 28, 2023
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jun 21, 2023 to Sep 8, 2023
2 more representatives and 1 senator signed on in support.
-
Jun 13, 2023
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 7, 2023
Sent to the Senate Committee on Utilities and Technology.
-
Jun 7, 2023
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jun 7, 2023 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Marklein, Ballweg, Felzkowski, Feyen, James, Pfaff, Testin, Wimberger and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Summerfield, Swearingen, Armstrong, Binsfeld, Callahan, Considine, Edming, Green, Hurd, S. Johnson, Kitchens, Magnafici, Mursau, Novak, O'Connor, Penterman, Plumer, Pronschinske, Sapik, Schmidt, Schraa, Tranel, Tusler, Sinicki and Conley
- Jun 7, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Utilities and Technology
- Jun 13, 2023 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 21, 2023 · Senate
Representative Subeck added as a cosponsor
- Jun 22, 2023 · Senate
Senator Stafsholt added as a coauthor
- Sep 8, 2023 · Senate
Representative Jacobson added as a cosponsor
- Sep 13, 2023 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Marklein
- Sep 28, 2023 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 5, 2023 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 6, 2023 · Senate
Representative Joers added as a cosponsor
- Oct 6, 2023 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 6, 2023 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Utilities and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 6, 2023 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 16, 2023 · Senate
Placed on calendar 10-17-2023 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Oct 16, 2023 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Representative Steffen added as a cosponsor
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Read a second time
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly
Read
- Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from Senate message and take up
- Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 18, 2023 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Oct 19, 2023 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)
- Oct 19, 2023 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Nov 30, 2023 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 11-30-2023
- Dec 7, 2023 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 12-6-2023. 2023 Wisconsin Act 77
- Dec 7, 2023 · Senate
Published 12-7-2023
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote