Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: special motions to strike strategic lawsuits against public participation. (FE)
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill allows a person to file a special motion to strike in a strategic lawsuit
against public participation which, if successful, results in dismissal of the claim
subject to the motion. Under the bill, a cause of action brought against a person
arising from that person's acts in furtherance of his or her right of petition or free
speech under the United States or Wisconsin Constitution in connection with a
public issue is subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that
the plaintiff has established a probability of prevailing on the claim.
The bill provides that an act in furtherance of a person's constitutional right of
petition or free speech in connection with a public issue includes any written or oral
statement or writing made a) before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding,
or any other official proceeding authorized by law; b) in connection with an issue
under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any
other official proceeding authorized by law; or c) in a place open to the public or a
public forum in connection with an issue of public interest. The bill also provides that
any other conduct might also be considered to be an act in furtherance of a person's
constitutional right of petition or free speech in connection with a public issue. No
special motion to strike may be brought in any enforcement action brought in the
name of the people of Wisconsin by the attorney general, a district attorney, or a city
attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.
In making a determination on a special motion to strike, the court must
consider the pleadings and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon
which the liability or defense is based. If the court determines that the plaintiff has
established a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim, neither that
determination nor the fact of that determination are admissible in evidence at any
later stage of the case, or in any subsequent action, and no burden of proof or degree
of proof otherwise applicable is affected by that determination in that case or any
subsequent proceeding. Under the bill, except in certain circumstances, a defendant
who prevails on a special motion to strike is entitled to recover attorney fees and
costs. If, however, the court finds that a special motion to strike is frivolous or is
solely intended to cause unnecessary delay, the court must award costs and
reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing plaintiff. The bill allows a person to appeal
as a matter or right an order granting or denying a special motion to strike.
The bill requires that a special motion be filed within 60 days of the service of
the complaint or later if the court permits. The motion must be scheduled for a
hearing not more than 30 days after the service of the motion unless
the court's
schedule does not allow for a hearing in that timeframe. Unless the court determines
otherwise, when a notice of a special motion is filed, all discovery proceedings in the
action are stayed until a ruling is made on the motion.
Any party who files a special motion to strike, and any party who files an
Sponsors
Full history
- Sep 8, 2023 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Agard, Roys, Taylor, Larson, Carpenter, Hesselbein, Spreitzer, Smith, Pfaff and Wirch; cosponsored by Representatives J. Anderson, Andraca, Conley, Considine, Drake, Hong, Joers, Moore Omokunde, Ohnstad, Ratcliff, Sinicki, Snodgrass and Shankland
- Sep 8, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Sep 8, 2023 · Senate
Representative Jacobson added as a cosponsor
- Sep 20, 2023 · Senate
Representative Subeck added as a cosponsor
- Sep 21, 2023 · Senate
Representative Palmeri added as a cosponsor
- Oct 13, 2023 · Senate
Representative C. Anderson added as a cosponsor
- Oct 24, 2023 · Senate
Representative Madison added as a cosponsor
- Feb 21, 2024 · Senate
Representative Emerson added as a cosponsor
- Apr 15, 2024 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1