Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Senate Bill 507

Race-based nicknames, logos, mascots, and team names; providing an exemption from rule-making and emergency rule procedures; and making an appropriation. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 16, 2023

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2024: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Education. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill restores the law as it existed prior to the enactment of 2013 Wisconsin Act 115 governing the use of race-based nicknames, logos, mascots, and team names by school boards and authorizes the Department of Public Instruction to award a grant to a school board that terminates the use of a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name that is associated with a federally recognized American Indian tribe or American Indians.

Under current law, a complaint to object to a school board's use of a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name must include the signatures of at least the number of school district residents that is equal to 10 percent of the school district's membership, and the signatures must be obtained within the 120-day period before the complaint is filed. The bill eliminates this requirement. Under the bill, the state superintendent of public instruction must immediately review a complaint submitted by a school district resident and determine whether the use of the nickname or team name by the school board, alone or in connection with a logo or mascot, is ambiguous as to whether it is race-based.

Read the full summary

Under current law, the Division of Hearings and Appeals is required to hold a hearing on a complaint objecting to a school board's use of a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name. Under the bill, unless the state superintendent determines that a contested case hearing is not necessary or otherwise postpones the hearing, the state superintendent must hold a hearing within 45 days of receiving such a complaint. The bill also reverses the burden of proof at a hearing challenging the use of a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name so that the burden is on the school board to demonstrate that the nickname, logo, mascot, or team name does not promote discrimination, pupil harassment, or stereotyping.

Under current law, the state superintendent may forego a hearing on a complaint if a school board demonstrates that a federally recognized American Indian tribe that has historical ties to this state has, under an agreement with the school board, approved the school board's use of the nickname, logo, mascot, or team name. The bill restricts the state superintendent's authority to forego a hearing to only those situations in which the American Indian tribe that is referenced, depicted, or portrayed in the nickname, logo, mascot, or team name approved the use.

Under current law, a school district is prohibited from being a member of an interscholastic athletic association that bars a member from using a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name unless the use violates a decision and order issued on or after December 21, 2013. The bill eliminates this prohibition. The bill also eliminates a prohibition against the state superintendent promulgating rules that create a presumption of what constitutes a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name that promotes discrimination, pupil harassment, or stereotyping.

Under the bill, DPI may award a grant to a school board that terminates the use of a race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name, regardless of whether the termination is voluntary, in response to an objection, or to comply with an order. The bill specifies that the amount of the grant may not exceed the greater of $50,000 or the actual cost incurred by the school board to replace the race-based nickname, logo, mascot, or team name. Under the bill, these grants are funded from Indian gaming receipts.

Who's behind it

9 senators are its ⁠. All 9 are Democrats.

22 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 31 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (22)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 15, 2024

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 13, 2024 to Feb 21, 2024

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  3. Nov 8, 2023

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Oct 16, 2023

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.

  5. Oct 16, 2023

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 16, 2023 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Larson, L. Johnson, Smith, Roys, Hesselbein, Agard, Spreitzer, Carpenter and Pfaff; cosponsored by Representatives Shelton, Ratcliff, Jacobson, C. Anderson, Considine, Shankland, J. Anderson, Baldeh, Cabrera, Clancy, Conley, Haywood, Hong, Joers, Ohnstad, Palmeri, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Stubbs and Vining

  2. Oct 16, 2023 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Education

  3. Nov 8, 2023 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Representative Madison added as a cosponsor

  5. Feb 21, 2024 · Senate

    Representative Emerson added as a cosponsor

  6. Apr 15, 2024 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate