Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Senate Bill 627

The rights of employees to request and receive work schedule changes; predictable work schedules for retail, food service, and cleaning employees; granting rule-making authority; and providing a penalty. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 7, 2023

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 15, 2024: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor, Regulatory Reform, Veterans and Military Affairs. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill provides that an employee who works for an employer, including the state and political subdivision employers, that employs at least 15 employees has the right to request and receive changes to the employee's work schedule under certain circumstances. The bill also provides rights regarding work scheduling for employees in certain retail, food service, or cleaning occupations, or other occupations designated by the Department of Workforce Development.

Employee right to request and receive work schedule changes Under the bill, an employer must negotiate in good faith with an employee to accommodate changes the employee requests to his or her work schedule. Further, unless an employer has a bona fide business reason for denying the request, the employer must approve an employee's request if it is directly related to any of the following:

Read the full summary

1. A serious health condition of the employee.

2. Responsibilities of the employee as a caregiver for a family member.

3. Enrollment of the employee in certain educational or training programs.

4. A part-time employee's work scheduling conflicts with the employee's other employment.

If an employer denies an employee's request for a schedule change, the employer must inform the employee of the reasons for denial, including whether any of the reasons is a bona fide business reason as defined in the bill.

Service employee right to predictable work schedule The bill requires an employer that employs an employee in certain service industry occupations, including retail, food service, and cleaning occupations to provide the service employee a written copy of the employee's work schedule on or before the service employee's first day of work. With certain exceptions, if an employer changes the service employee's work schedule, the employer must provide the new work schedule to the employee at least 14 days in advance.

The bill also requires that if an employer changes a service employee's work schedule with fewer than 14 days' notice, the employer must pay the service employee an amount equal to the employee's regular rate of pay for one hour of work.

Exceptions to this requirement include when the employee consents to the change or when the employer requires the service employee to work additional time because another employee was scheduled to work that time and is unexpectedly unavailable to work.

The bill also requires the following for employers that use certain scheduling practices:

1. If the service employee reports to work and the employer does not allow the employee to work all time scheduled, the employer must provide the employee with:

1) full compensation as if the employee had worked the full shift; or 2) if the employee is scheduled to work more than four hours and works less than four hours, an amount equal to the employee's regular rate of pay for the difference between four hours and the amount of time the employee actually works.

2. If the employer requires the service employee to contact the employer, or wait to be contacted by the employer less than 24 hours before a work shift to determine whether the employee must report to work, the employer must pay the employee an amount equal to the employee's regular rate of pay for one hour of work.

3. If the employer requires the service employee to work a split shift, the employer must pay the employee an amount equal to the employee's regular rate of pay for one hour of work.

If a service employee experiences more than one type of these scheduling practices with respect to a particular work shift, the employer must pay only one type of compensation, whichever is greatest.

The bill also provides that, during any period in which the employer's regular operations are suspended due to an event outside of the employer's control, the employer is not required to comply with the service employee work scheduling requirements created in the bill.

The bill authorizes DWD to promulgate rules to apply the protections afforded under the bill to additional occupations if DWD determines that at least 10 percent of the individuals employed in an occupation either typically receive notice of changes to their work schedules less than 14 days before the changes take effect or regularly experience fluctuations in the number of hours the individuals are scheduled to work on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis.

Enforcement The bill provides that an employer may not interfere with, restrain, or deny the exercise of the right of an employee created in the bill and may not discharge or discriminate against an employee for enforcing the employee's rights under the bill.

An employee whose rights are violated may file a complaint with DWD, and DWD must process the complaint in the same manner that employment discrimination complaints are processed under current law. That processing may include the ordering of back pay, reinstatement, compensation in lieu of reinstatement, and costs and attorney fees.

The bill also provides that DWD or an employee whose rights are violated may bring an action in circuit court against the employer without regard to exhaustion of any administrative remedy. If the circuit court finds that a violation has occurred, the employer may be liable to the employee for compensatory damages, reasonable attorney fees and costs, and, under certain circumstances, liquidated damages equal to 100 percent of the amount of compensatory damages awarded to the employee.

In addition to any damages imposed on an employer in an administrative proceeding or circuit court action, an employer that willfully violates the protections created in the bill may be required to forfeit not more than $1,000 for each violation.

Who's behind it

6 senators are its ⁠. All 6 are Democrats.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 15, 2024

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 2, 2024

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Nov 7, 2023

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Regulatory Reform, Veterans and Military Affairs.

  4. Nov 7, 2023

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 7, 2023 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Roys, Agard, Carpenter, L. Johnson, Larson and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Representatives J. Anderson, C. Anderson, Baldeh, Bare, Drake, Moore Omokunde, Ohnstad, Sinicki and Subeck

  2. Nov 7, 2023 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor, Regulatory Reform, Veterans and Military Affairs

  3. Jan 2, 2024 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 15, 2024 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate