Senate Bill 702
Funding for technical college oral health care programs. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Feb 1, 2024. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 21, 2023
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Jan 16, 2024
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jan 16, 2024
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2023 Wisconsin Act 89
Latest entry in the official record, Feb 1, 2024: “Published 2-1-2024”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill specifies that the Joint Committee on Finance may provide up to $20,000,000 in funding in the 2023-25 fiscal biennium, from the JCF supplemental appropriation, for technical college programs to expand the state's oral health care workforce. The Technical College System Board, in coordination with the technical colleges, may submit a request to JCF for this funding with a plan that identifies each technical college that requests funding, the amount of funding requested, and a detailed description of the eligible expenditures for which the funding would be used.
The bill defines “eligible expenditures” as 1) capital expenditures, such as expenditures for equipment or facility improvements or expansion; 2) expenditures for instructional supplies, teaching materials and resources, consumables, or clinic fees; and 3) hiring bonuses of up to $5,000 for oral health care instructors if certain requirements are satisfied. The plan must also include requests for 1) up to $2,000,000 for Northcentral Technical College to expand current dental hygienist and dental assistant programs and for development of a dental therapy program if dental therapy becomes an authorized dental practice; 2) up to $1,430,000 for any other technical college that offers a dental hygienist program; and 3) up to $1,000,000 for any technical college that offers no dental program or only a dental assistant program, to create a new program or expand an existing program. However, the plan may also include, for these technical colleges, requests for additional funding for purposes consistent with the bill. The plan must include sufficient information for JCF to determine that 1) the requested funding will be used only for eligible expenditures to expand a technical college's existing oral health care program that has a capacity limit and a current waiting list or to create a new oral health care program after a finding of demonstrated community interest in and need for the program; and 2) the technical college will provide 20 percent matching funding, except that the technical college must provide no less than 50 percent matching funding for instructor hiring bonuses.
Read the full summary Show less
Under the bill, if JCF approves the plan (as proposed or as modified), JCF provides funding to the TCS Board. The TCS Board then reimburses each technical college for its eligible expenditures under the approved plan if the TCS Board finds the technical college complied with the requirements in the bill. If a technical college has not requested reimbursement from the TCS Board within 12 months after JCF approves the plan or if the technical college informs the TCS Board that it will not implement the program changes described in the approved plan, the TCS Board may submit a request to JCF to redistribute the funds allocated for that technical college to another technical college to be used for a purpose consistent with the bill. The request must include certain information and is submitted to JCF for approval under a 14-day passive review process.
The bill also requires a report to the legislature that includes the amount of funding each technical college received, a detailed description of all expenditures for which the funding was used, and the impact of the funding on the technical college's oral health care programs.
Who's behind it
6 senators are its . 4 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.
11 more lawmakers .
See all 17 names Hide the names
Authors (6)
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Mary Felzkowski · Republican, Senate
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
- Mark Spreitzer · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Patrick Testin · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (11)
- Amy Binsfeld · Republican, Assembly
- Calvin Callahan · Republican, Assembly
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- Dora Drake · Democrat, Senate
- Rick Gundrum · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Melotik · Republican, Assembly
- Clint Moses · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez · Democrat, Assembly
- Subeck and O'Connor
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges vote to recommend it
Passed, 6 to 0 · Jan 9, 2024
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Feb 1, 2024
The new law was published.
-
Feb 1, 2024
The governor signed it. It became 2023 Wisconsin Act 89.
-
Jan 29, 2024
Sent to the governor.
-
Jan 16, 2024
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Jan 16, 2024
“Read” (the official wording)
-
Jan 16, 2024
The Assembly received it.
-
Jan 16, 2024
The Senate passed it.
-
Jan 10, 2024 to Jan 16, 2024
3 more representatives and 1 senator signed on in support.
-
Jan 9, 2024
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.
-
Dec 20, 2023
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Dec 6, 2023
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 21, 2023
Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges.
-
Nov 21, 2023
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 21, 2023 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Felzkowski, Cowles, Nass, Taylor, Testin and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Representatives Melotik, Moses, Binsfeld, Callahan, Dittrich, Gundrum, Ortiz-Velez and Murphy
- Nov 21, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges
- Dec 6, 2023 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Dec 20, 2023 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 3, 2024 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 9, 2024 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Jan 9, 2024 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 10, 2024 · Senate
Representative Drake added as a cosponsor
- Jan 12, 2024 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-16-2024 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly
Read
- Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from Senate message and take up
- Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Jan 16, 2024 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 16, 2024 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Jan 19, 2024 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Jan 29, 2024 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 1-29-2024
- Feb 1, 2024 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 1-31-2024. 2023 Wisconsin Act 89
- Feb 1, 2024 · Senate
Published 2-1-2024
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote