Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: apprenticeship and youth apprenticeship completion awards, career and technical education incentive grants and completion awards, technical preparation programs in school districts and technical colleges, creating an individual income tax credit for completing an apprenticeship program, rejection criteria for part-time open enrollment applications, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, and providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures. (FE)
Apprenticeship Income tax — Credit School — Attendance School — Curriculum Technical college Technical college system board Wage Youth
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Apprenticeship and youth apprenticeship
Under current law, any person 16 years of age or older may enter into an
apprenticeship, which is a contract whereby the person (apprentice) receives from
his or her employer in consideration for the apprentice's services, instruction in any
trade, craft, or business. That instruction may include related classroom instruction.
Apprenticeship programs are operated by sponsors and approved by the Department
of Workforce Development. In some cases, the sponsor of an apprenticeship program
is the employer, while in other cases, apprenticeship programs are operated by other
types of sponsors, such as apprenticeship committees. Current law also provides for
a youth apprenticeship program, under which DWD develops curricula for several
specified occupational areas. As established by DWD, a youth apprenticeship is
available to high school pupils and consists of work for an employer and related
classroom instruction. The apprenticeship and youth apprenticeship programs are
administered by DWD. This bill makes various changes related to apprenticeships
and youth apprenticeships, including the following:
Skilled wage rate
Under DWD's current apprenticeship rules, an apprentice contract wage scale
is deemed adequate when, during the term of training, it averages 60 percent of the
current journeyworker rate or skilled wage rate. The skilled wage rate is therefore
used to determine what constitutes an adequate wage scale for apprentices. For
apprentices in construction who are not covered under a collective bargaining
agreement, the skilled wage rate is the rate average, calculated as the mean, based
on the geographical area of the appropriate local apprenticeship committee. For
apprentices in other (nonconstruction) industry sectors who are not covered under
a collective bargaining agreement, the skilled wage rate is the rate paid to the
greatest number of competent journeyworkers in like establishments in the
community or another rate deemed adequate by DWD. The rate for apprentices who
are covered under a collective bargaining agreement is determined by the
agreement.
The bill provides that the skilled wage rate for apprentices in all industries who
are not covered under a collective bargaining agreement is the average rate paid to
competent journeyworkers in like establishments in the area, as determined by the
sponsor. The bill maintains the wage scale requirement described above and the
requirement that, in determining the skilled wage rate for apprentices whose
employment is governed by a collective bargaining agreement, the rate specified in
the collective bargaining agreement applies.
Apprenticeship completion awards
Current law provides for an apprenticeship completion award program
(ACAP), administered by DWD, under which apprentices and their sponsors may
receive reimbursement for tuition costs charged to an apprentice to participate in the
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Cowles (R) , Feyen (R) , Testin (R)
27 cosponsors
Armstrong (R) , Behnke (R) , Callahan (R) , Dittrich (R) , Donovan (R) , Edming (R) , Goeben (R) , Gundrum (R) , Kitchens (R) , Krug (R) , Macco (R) , Maxey (R) , Melotik (R) , Moses (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Nedweski (R) , Novak (R) , O'Connor (R) , Oldenburg (R) , Penterman (R) , Petryk (R) , Rettinger (R) , Schraa (R) , Snyder (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R)
Full history
- Dec 8, 2023 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Feyen, Ballweg, Cowles and Testin; cosponsored by Representatives Oldenburg, Petryk, Armstrong, Behnke, Callahan, Dittrich, Donovan, Edming, Goeben, Gundrum, Kitchens, Krug, Macco, Maxey, Melotik, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, Novak, O'Connor, Penterman, Rettinger, Schraa, Snyder, Tusler and VanderMeer
- Dec 8, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges
- Jan 2, 2024 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 10, 2024 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 17, 2024 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 17, 2024 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 22, 2024 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 15, 2024 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1