Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Senate Bill 915

The maximum life and allocation period for Tax Incremental District Number 4 in the city of Antigo. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 22, 2024. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 11, 2024

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 13, 2024

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 98 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2023 Wisconsin Act 137

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 22, 2024: “Published 3-22-2024”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill increases the maximum life and tax allocation period for Tax Incremental District (TID) Number 4 in the city of Antigo.

Under current law, cities and villages may use tax incremental financing (TIF) to encourage development in the city or village. In general, under TIF, a city or village pays for improvements in a TID then collects tax moneys attributable to other taxing jurisdictions for a period of time on the increased property value in the TID to pay for the improvements. Ideally, after a period of time, the city or village has been repaid for its initial investment and the property tax base in the TID has permanently increased in value.

Read the full summary

In general and in brief, a city or village makes use of TIF using the following procedure:

1. The city or village designates an area as a TID and creates a project plan laying out the expenditures that the city or village will make within the TID.

2. The Department of Revenue establishes the “base value” of the TID. This value is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation.

3. Each year thereafter, the “value increment” of the property within the TID is determined by subtracting the base value from the current value of property within the TID. The portion of taxes collected on any positive value increment is collected by the city or village for use solely for the project costs of the TID. The taxes collected by the city or village on positive value increments include taxes that would have been collected by other taxing jurisdictions, such as counties or school districts, were the TID not created.

4. Tax increments are collected until the city or village has recovered all of its project costs or until the TID reaches its statutory termination date. The statutes provide several different termination dates for different types of TIDs. In most cases, TIDs must terminate 23 years or 27 years after the TID is created.

TID Number 4 in the city of Antigo was created as an industrial TID in September of 1999. Under current law, the unextended termination date of TID Number 4 in the city of Antigo is 23 years, because the TID is an industrial TID for which no finding of blight was made and the TID was created after September 30, 1995, and before October 1, 2004.

Under this bill, the life of TID Number 4 in the city of Antigo is extended, and tax increments may continue to be allocated, for up to 29 years after the TID's creation.

Also under current law, a city or village may extend the life of a TID for up to one year for housing stock improvement if all of the following occur:

1. The city or village pays off all of the TID's project costs.

2. The city or village adopts a resolution stating that it intends to extend the life of the TID, the number of months it intends to do so, and how it intends to improve housing stock.

3. The city or village notifies DOR.

Under the bill, a housing stock improvement extension may not be exercised with regard to TID Number 4 in the city of Antigo.

Who's behind it

Mary Felzkowski, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 6, 2024

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 6, 2024

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 0 · Feb 13, 2024

See how each of the 32 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 98 to 0 · Feb 20, 2024 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (98)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 22, 2024

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 22, 2024

    The governor signed it. It became 2023 Wisconsin Act 137.

  3. Mar 18, 2024

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 20, 2024

    The Assembly passed it too, 98 to 0.

  5. Feb 20, 2024

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  6. Feb 14, 2024

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Feb 13, 2024

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Feb 13, 2024

    The Senate passed it, 32 to 0.

  9. Feb 13, 2024

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Feb 6, 2024

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  11. Feb 6, 2024

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Feb 1, 2024

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Jan 26, 2024

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Jan 11, 2024

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations.

  15. Jan 11, 2024

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 11, 2024 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Felzkowski; cosponsored by Representative Callahan

  2. Jan 11, 2024 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations

  3. Jan 26, 2024 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 1, 2024 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 1, 2024 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Felzkowski

  6. Feb 6, 2024 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 6, 2024 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Feb 6, 2024 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Feb 6, 2024 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 9, 2024 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-13-2024 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  13. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  15. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  16. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 13, 2024 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Feb 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Feb 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-20-2024 by Committee on Rules

  20. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  21. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  23. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from joint committee on Finance and take up

  24. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 98, Noes 0

  27. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Feb 21, 2024 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  29. Feb 27, 2024 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  30. Mar 18, 2024 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-18-2024

  31. Mar 22, 2024 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-21-2024. 2023 Wisconsin Act 137

  32. Mar 22, 2024 · Senate

    Published 3-22-2024

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote