Bills · 2023-2024 Regular Session
Relating to: privacy protections for judicial officers, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Court — Commissioner Data processing — Privacy issues Elections commission Judge Legislature — Criminal penalties joint review committee on Privacy Supreme court Tanf _temporary assistance for needy families_
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill establishes privacy protections for judicial officers and a procedure for
a judicial officer to complete a written request for protection of the personal
information of the judicial officer and the judicial officer's immediate family.
Under the bill, a government agency may not publicly post or display publicly
available content that includes a judicial officer's personal information, provided
that the government agency has received a written request from the officer that the
agency refrain from disclosing the personal information. Upon receipt of the written
request, the agency must remove the personal information within five business days
and may not publicly post or display the information. The personal information is
also exempt from public records requests unless the agency has received consent to
make the information available to the public.
The bill also provides that, upon receipt of a written request for privacy
protections from a judicial officer, all persons, businesses, and associations must
refrain from publicly posting or displaying on the Internet publicly available content
that includes the personal information of the judicial officer or the judicial officer's
immediate family. The prohibition does not apply to personal information that the
judicial officer or an immediate family member of the judicial officer voluntarily
publishes on the Internet after the bill goes into effect or personal information
lawfully received from a state or federal government source, including from an
employee or agent of the state or federal government.
After a person, business, or association has received a written request from a
judicial officer, the person, business, or association must, within 72 hours of the
request, remove the personal information from the Internet; ensure that the judicial
officer's personal information is not made available on any website or subsidiary
website controlled by that person, business, or association; and identify any other
instances of the identified information that should also be removed. Under the bill,
once a written request is received, no person, business, or association may transfer
the judicial officer's personal information to any other person, business, or
association through any medium, except for personal information that the judicial
officer or an immediate family member of the judicial officer voluntarily publishes
on the Internet after the bill goes into effect, or if a transfer is made at the request
of the judicial officer or is necessary to effectuate a request to the person, business,
or association from the judicial officer. The bill also expressly prohibits a data broker,
as defined in the bill, from knowingly selling, licensing, trading, purchasing, or
otherwise making available for consideration the personal information of a judicial
officer or a judicial officer's immediate family.
Under the bill, a candidate for a judicial office may, instead of having his or her
name and residential address listed on nomination papers, file a certification of
residence with the Elections Commission before circulating nomination papers. A
judicial officer circulating nomination papers on behalf of a candidate for a
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Feb 27, 2024 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Feb 27, 2024 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 19, 2024 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Wanggaard and Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Tusler and Ortiz-Velez
- Jan 19, 2024 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Jan 24, 2024 · Senate
Representative Hurd added as a cosponsor
- Jan 29, 2024 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 2, 2024 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Wanggaard
- Feb 6, 2024 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 7, 2024 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 14, 2024 · Senate
Representative O'Connor added as a cosponsor
- Feb 15, 2024 · Senate
Representative Subeck added as a cosponsor
- Feb 23, 2024 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Senator Wanggaard
- Feb 27, 2024 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 27, 2024 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 27, 2024 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 27, 2024 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 15, 2024 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1