Skip to content
Bills from the 2023–24 session

Senate Bill 932

Modifications to building program project budgets, selection of project architects and engineers, single prime contracting, agency cooperation with energy conservation contractors, timeline for claims before the Claims Board, and making a transfer to the state building trust fund. (FE)

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Mar 29, 2024. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 19, 2024

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 13, 2024

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 22, 2024

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Mar 29, 2024.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 15, 2024: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Modifications to building program project budgets Under current law, the Building Commission has the authority to authorize limited changes in the program or budget of a building program project if the commission determines that unanticipated program conditions or bidding conditions require the change to effectively and economically construct the project.

Under this bill, the commission may not increase the budget of a project enumerated in the state building program by more than 10 percent without submitting the proposed project budget increase for approval by the Joint Committee on Finance under passive review.

Read the full summary

The bill also requires that the Department of Administration submit a quarterly report to JCF and each voting member of the Building Commission that identifies each project for which the Building Commission has approved a budget increase and identifies each project enumerated in the state building program for which DOA estimates a budget increase will be necessary for project completion, including a description of the reasons for the project budget shortfall.

Selection of project architects and engineers Under current law, the secretary of administration is required to establish a committee for each construction project under DOA's supervision, except certain emergency projects, for the purpose of selecting an architect or engineer for the project. If the estimated cost of a construction project is $7,400,000 or more, the selection committee must use a request-for-proposal process established by DOA to select an architect or engineer for the project based on qualifications. The bill raises that threshold to $15,000,000.

Additionally, the bill prohibits such a committee from refusing to select an architect or engineer who operates an architect or engineering firm with only one responsible architect or engineer for a construction project that has an estimated cost of less than $2,000,000. The bill also allows DOA to increase this threshold up to $15,000,000.

Single prime contracting The bill creates a new exception to single prime contracting for high-dollar building projects. Single prime contracting is a process in which the state contracts only with a general prime contractor who then must contract with subcontractors.

Under current law, whenever the Building Commission determines that the use of innovative types of design and construction processes will make better use of the resources and technology available in the building industry, the commission may waive certain requirements related to single prime contracting, if the action is in the best interest of the state and is approved by the commission.

Under the bill, for any project costing $200,000,000 or more, at the request of the agency for which the project is constructed, the Building Commission is required to waive certain single prime contracting requirements for the project, as requested by the agency.

Certain project bidding procedures Under the bill, at any time more than two days prior to the end of the period during which bids may be submitted for a building project, a bidder or potential bidder may submit a question to DOA concerning the project. Additionally, the bill provides that DOA may issue addenda at any time during the bidding period to modify or clarify the drawings and specifications for the project being bid or to extend the bidding period.

Cooperation with energy conservation contractors Current law authorizes DOA to contract with qualified contractors for the performance of energy conservation audits at state buildings, structures, and facilities and for the performance of construction work at a state building, structure, or facility for the purpose of realizing potential savings of future energy costs identified in an energy conservation audit. The bill requires DOA and the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System to collaborate with energy service companies to identify and execute pilot projects using financing provided by the companies to upgrade facilities, reduce deferred maintenance, and increase sustainability.

Utilities costs The bill provides that each state contract for construction work must state which party to the contract is responsible for paying project utility service connection charges and which party is responsible for paying for costs related to the consumption of utility services at the project site.

Actions against the state related to certain contract claims Under current law, the Claims Board is required to receive, investigate, and make recommendations on all claims against the state of $10 or more that are referred to the board by the Department of Administration. The board is required to report its findings and recommendations on all claims referred to the board to the legislature. The board may deny a claim, directly pay a claim of up to $10,000, or recommend a payment in excess of $10,000 to the legislature. If the board concludes that a claim should be paid by the state and the board does not or may not directly pay the claim, current law requires the board to cause a bill to be drafted covering its recommendations. A claimant may commence a lawsuit against the state upon the refusal of the legislature to pass a bill allowing a claim.

This bill creates a timeline for the board to hear and make a final determination upon certain claims related to contracts and, in addition to current law, allows claimants to bring actions against the state related to certain contract claims if certain conditions are met. Under the bill, any claim referred to the board that relates to a contract with the Department of Transportation for transportation infrastructure improvement or that relates to a contract with DOA or the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System that is awarded under current law for construction projects must be heard by the board, and the board must make a final determination on the claim, within six months from the day that the claim was referred to the board. If the board concludes that the facts of the claim would be more properly adjudicated in a court of law or if the board fails to make a final determination on the claim within six months from the date that the claim was referred to the board, the bill allows the claimant to commence an action against the state seeking judgment on the claim as provided under current law.

Transfer to the building trust fund The bill transfers $32,000,000 from the general fund to the building trust fund in fiscal year 2023-24.

Who's behind it

Joan Ballweg, a Republican, is its ⁠.

15 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 16 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (15)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote on an amendment

Passed, 4 to 1 · Feb 6, 2024

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Feb 6, 2024

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 3 · Feb 7, 2024

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 12 to 3 · Feb 7, 2024

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 22 to 9 · May 14, 2024 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 32 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CALL THE QUESTION”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 21 to 10 · May 14, 2024 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 32 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASS NOTWITHSTANDING OBJECTIONS OF GOVERNOR”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 15, 2024

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. May 14, 2024

    The Assembly voted to override the veto.

  3. May 14, 2024

    “Messaged” (the official wording)

  4. May 14, 2024

    The Senate voted to override the veto, 21 to 10.

  5. May 14, 2024

    “Move to call the question, Ayes 22, Noes 9” (the official wording)

  6. Mar 29, 2024

    The governor vetoed it.

  7. Mar 26, 2024

    Sent to the governor.

  8. Feb 22, 2024

    The Assembly passed it too.

  9. Feb 20, 2024

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  10. Feb 13, 2024

    The Assembly received it.

  11. Feb 13, 2024

    The Senate passed it.

  12. Feb 13, 2024

    The Senate adopted it.

  13. Feb 7, 2024

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 3.

  14. Feb 7, 2024

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  15. Feb 6, 2024

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  16. Feb 6, 2024

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  17. Feb 6, 2024

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1” (the official wording)

  18. Feb 5, 2024

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  19. Feb 1, 2024

    The committee held a public hearing.

  20. Jan 19, 2024

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations.

  21. Jan 19, 2024

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 19, 2024 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Ballweg; cosponsored by Representatives Born, Armstrong, Donovan, Gundrum, Hurd, Krug, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, Novak, O'Connor, Plumer, Schmidt, Swearingen and Wittke

  2. Jan 19, 2024 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations

  3. Jan 30, 2024 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Ballweg

  4. Feb 1, 2024 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 5, 2024 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 6, 2024 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 6, 2024 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  8. Feb 6, 2024 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  9. Feb 6, 2024 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 6, 2024 · Senate

    Withdrawn from committee on Senate Organization and rereferred to joint committee on Finance pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)

  11. Feb 7, 2024 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  12. Feb 7, 2024 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  13. Feb 7, 2024 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 3

  14. Feb 7, 2024 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  15. Feb 9, 2024 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-13-2024 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  16. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Read a second time

  17. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  18. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  20. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  21. Feb 13, 2024 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Feb 13, 2024 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  23. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  24. Feb 20, 2024 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:34 AM on 2-22-2024 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 29

  25. Feb 22, 2024 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  26. Feb 22, 2024 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Feb 22, 2024 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  28. Feb 22, 2024 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  29. Feb 22, 2024 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Feb 22, 2024 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  31. Feb 27, 2024 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  32. Mar 26, 2024 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2024

  33. Mar 29, 2024 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-29-2024

  34. May 13, 2024 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  35. May 14, 2024 · Senate

    Rules suspended and taken up

  36. May 14, 2024 · Senate

    Move to call the question, Ayes 22, Noes 9

  37. May 14, 2024 · Senate

    Passed notwithstanding the objections of the Governor, Ayes 21, Noes 10

  38. May 14, 2024 · Senate

    Messaged

  39. May 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Received from Senate passed notwithstanding the objections of the Governor

  40. May 14, 2024 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-15-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  41. May 15, 2024 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote