Senate Bill 1
Fall workforce package, granting rule-making authority, making an appropriation, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Vetoed by the governor
Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Nov 20, 2023. Lawmakers did not , so it stands.
-
Introduced, passed
Sep 21, 2023
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 22 to 10
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 62 to 36
-
Governor, stopped here
Vetoed Nov 20, 2023.
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, May 14, 2024: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Payments to child care programs This bill authorizes the Department of Children and Families to establish a program for making monthly payments and monthly per-child payments to certified child care providers, licensed child care centers, and child care programs established or contracted for by a school board. This new payment program is in addition to the current law system for providing child care payments under Wisconsin Shares. The bill allows DCF to promulgate rules to implement the program, including establishing eligibility requirements and payment amounts and setting requirements for how recipients may use the payments. The bill funds the program through a new appropriation and by allocating federal moneys, including child care development funds and moneys received under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant program.
Child care partnership grant program This bill authorizes DCF to establish a grant program to award funding to businesses that provide or wish to provide child care services for their employees.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill allows such a grant to be used to reserve child care placements for local business employees, pay child care tuition, and other costs related to child care.
Under the bill, a grant recipient must provide at least 25 percent matching funds.
The bill allows DCF to promulgate rules to administer the grant program, including to determine eligibility for a grant.
Family and medical leave expansion Under the current family and medical leave law, an employer that employs at least 50 individuals on a permanent basis must permit an employee who has been employed by the employer for more than 52 consecutive weeks and who has worked for the employer for at least 1,000 hours during the preceding 52 weeks to take family leave to care for the employee's child, spouse, domestic partner, or parent who has a serious health condition. Employers covered under the law must also permit an employee covered under the law to take up to two weeks of medical leave in a 12-month period when that employee has a serious health condition. An employee may file a complaint with the Department of Workforce Development regarding an alleged violation of the family and medical leave law within 30 days after either the violation occurs or the employee should reasonably have known that the violation occurred, whichever is later.
This bill makes the following changes to the family and medical leave law:
1. Requires employers covered under the law to permit employees covered under the law to take family leave to provide for a grandparent, grandchild, or sibling who has a serious health condition.
2. Decreases the number of hours an employee is required to work before qualifying for family and medical leave to 680 hours during the preceding 52 weeks.
3. Increases the amount of weeks an employee is able to take in family and medical leave for any eligible reason to 12 weeks.
4. Extends the time period in which an employee may file a complaint with DWD to 300 days after either the violation occurs or the employee should reasonably have known that the violation occurred, whichever is later.
5. Removes the age restriction from the definition of “child” for various purposes under the family and medical leave law.
6. Requires employers to permit employees to take family leave in the instance of an unforeseen or unexpected gap in child care for an employee's child, grandchild, or sibling or because of a qualifying exigency as to be determined by DWD related to covered active duty, as defined in the bill, or notification of an impending call or order to covered active duty of an employee's child, spouse, domestic partner, parent, grandparent, grandchild, or sibling who is a member of the U.S. armed forces.
7. Requires employers to permit employees to take family leave to address issues related to the employee or the employee's child, spouse, domestic partner, parent, grandparent, grandchild, or sibling being the victim of domestic abuse, sexual abuse, or stalking.
8. Requires employers to permit employees to take family leave to care for a child, spouse, domestic partner, parent, grandparent, grandchild, or sibling of an employee who is in medical isolation and requires employers to permit employees to take medical leave when an employee is in medical isolation. The bill defines “medical isolation” to include when a local health officer or the Department of Health Services advises that an individual isolate or quarantine; when a health care professional, a local health officer, or DHS advises that an individual seclude herself or himself when awaiting the results of a diagnostic test for a communicable disease or when the individual is infected with a communicable disease; and when an individual's employer advises that the individual not come to the workplace due to a concern that the individual may have been exposed to or infected with a communicable disease.
Family and medical leave benefits insurance program This bill creates a family and medical leave benefits insurance program, to be administered by DWD, under which a covered individual who is on certain family or medical leave is eligible, beginning on January 1, 2025, to receive up to 12 weeks of family or medical leave insurance benefits as specified in the bill from the family and medical leave benefits insurance trust fund created under the bill. For purposes of the bill, the following definitions apply:
1. A “covered individual" is an individual who worked for the same employer for at least 680 hours in the calendar year prior to the year in which the covered individual claims family or medical leave insurance benefits (application year) or a self-employed individual or employee of a small employer who elects coverage under the program.
2. “Family leave" means leave from employment, self-employment, or availability for employment for the birth or adoptive placement of a new child; to care for a family member who has a serious health condition or is in medical isolation; for covered active duty; or to address issues related to being the victim of domestic abuse, sexual abuse, or stalking.
3. “Medical leave" means leave from employment, self-employment, or availability for employment when a covered individual is in medical isolation or has a serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform his or her employment duties.
Under the bill, the amount of family or medical leave insurance benefits for a week for which those benefits are payable is as follows:
1. For the amount of the covered individual's average weekly earnings that are less than 50 percent of the state annual median wage in the calendar year before the individual's application year, 90 percent of that individual's average weekly earnings.
2. For the amount of the covered individual's average weekly earnings that are more than 50 percent of the state annual median wage in the calendar year before the individual's application year, 50 percent of that individual's average weekly earnings.
Beginning on January 1, 2025, the bill requires each individual employed in this state by an employer that regularly employs at least 50 individuals, including an individual employed by the state, and any self-employed individual or employee of a small employer who elects coverage under the family and medical leave benefits insurance program to contribute to the trust fund a percentage of his or her wages from employment or income from self-employment. Under the bill, each employer must contribute the same amount as an employee. The bill requires DWD to collect those contributions in the same manner as DWD collects contributions to the unemployment reserve fund under current law.
The bill provides that an employer that provides paid family and medical leave benefits that are identical to or more generous than those provided under the program may request an exemption from participation in the program. The bill requires DWD to promulgate rules to provide exemptions from participation in the program.
The bill further does the following:
1. Requires DWD to promulgate rules providing for a right to a hearing in cases of disputes involving an individual's eligibility for benefits or status as a covered individual under the program.
2. Requires DWD to promulgate rules providing for a right to a hearing in cases involving the liability of employers for contributions under the program.
3. Allows DWD to seek repayment of family or medical leave insurance benefits that are paid erroneously or as a result of willful misrepresentation. The bill allows DWD to establish other procedures for recovering overpayments and allows DWD to utilize procedures under the unemployment insurance law.
Paid family and medical leave This bill requires the administrator of the Division of Personnel Management in the Department of Administration to develop a program for paid family and medical leave of 12 weeks annually for most state employees. The bill requires the administrator to submit the plan for approval as a change to the state compensation plan to the Joint Committee on Employment Relations. If JCOER approves the plan, the plan becomes effective immediately.
The bill also requires the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System to develop a plan for a program for paid family and medical leave of 12 weeks annually for employees of the system and requires the board to submit the plan to the administrator of the Division of Personnel Management in DOA with its compensation plan changes for the 2023-25 biennium.
UW–Madison engineering building This bill amends the 2023-25 Authorized State Building Program to add one project for the University of Wisconsin–Madison. The project involves the demolition of an engineering facility and construction of a replacement engineering building at UW–Madison. The bill transfers $197,336,000 from the general fund to the capital improvement fund for purposes of the project.
Moneys transferred to capital improvement fund 2023 Wisconsin Act 19 transferred moneys from the general fund to the capital improvement fund to fund projects in the 2023-25 Authorized State Building Program. This bill specifies that those moneys may be used for those projects.
Current law generally provides that the capital improvement fund may be used only for purposes of public debt.
2023 Wisconsin Act 19 also provided the following:
1. That excess moneys transferred to the capital improvement fund under the act not used to fund projects authorized in the 2023-25 Authorized State Building Program must be transferred back to the general fund.
2. That moneys transferred to the capital improvement fund under the act, not to exceed $20,000,000, may be used to offset building program project budget cost overruns caused by inflation.
This bill provides that all moneys transferred to the capital improvement fund under the act not specified under item 1 above, or are not used to offset cost adjustments with respect to any building project authorized in the 2023-25 Authorized State Building Program, must be transferred back to the general fund.
Funding for the UW System This bill provides additional funding for the UW System under its general program operations appropriation.
Wisconsin grant program Down Down /2023/related/proposals/se3_sb1 true proposaltext /2023/related/proposals/se3_sb1 proposaltext/2023/SE3/SB1 proposaltext/2023/SE3/SB1 section true Menu » 2023 » Related Documents » Proposal Text » SE3 SB1: Bill Text × Details for PDF view Link (Permanent link) Bookmark this location View toggle Go to top of document Search in this chapter Search in this section Search in this agency Search in this chapter group Search in this chapter Search in this section Cross references for section Acts affecting this section References to this 1970 Statutes Annotations Appellate Court Citations Administrative Code Index Reference lines Clear highlighting $(document).ready(function () {
$('[data-toggle=tooltip]').tooltip({ container: 'body' });
Who's behind it
The Committee on Senate Organization introduced it at the governor's request.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 2 names Hide the names
Signed on in support (2)
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Spreitzer · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 8 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges vote on an amendment
Passed, 4 to 2 · Oct 16, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 4, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 2 · Oct 16, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 4, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 21 to 10 · Oct 17, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 10”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 22 to 10 · Oct 17, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 22, Noes 10”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 21 to 11 · Oct 17, 2023 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (21)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Cory Tomczyk (R, 29)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Eric Wimberger (R, 2)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jesse James (R, 23)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- Julian Bradley (R, 28)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara (R, 19)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Rob Hutton (R, 5)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Romaine Quinn (R, 25)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (11)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Brad Pfaff (D, 32)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Mark Spreitzer (D, 15)
- Melissa Agard (D, 16)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Didn't vote (1)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 4 · Nov 7, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 8, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 62 to 36 · Nov 14, 2023 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 99 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (62)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alex Dallman (R, 39)
- Amanda Nedweski (R, 32)
- Amy Binsfeld (R, 27)
- Angie Sapik (R, 73)
- Barbara Dittrich (R, 99)
- Bob Donovan (R, 61)
- Bob Wittke (R, 63)
- Calvin Callahan (R, 35)
- Chanz Green (R, 74)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Clint Moses (R, 92)
- Dave Armstrong (R, 67)
- Dave Maxey (R, 83)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Donna Rozar (R, 69)
- Elijah Behnke (R, 6)
- Ellen Schutt (R, 31)
- Gae Magnafici (R, 28)
- Gus Gustafson (R, 55)
- James Edming (R, 87)
- Janel Brandtjen (R, 22)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jerry O'Connor (R, 60)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- John Macco (R, 88)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Jon Plumer (R, 42)
- Joy Goeben (R, 5)
- Karen Hurd (R, 69)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Loren Oldenburg (R, 96)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Michael Schraa (R, 53)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Nik Rettinger (R, 83)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Melotik (R, 22)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Peter Schmidt (R, 6)
- Rick Gundrum (R, 58)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Scott Johnson (R, 33)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Shae Sortwell (R, 2)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
- Terry Katsma (R, 26)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Tom Michalski (R, 13)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Ty Bodden (R, 59)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
- Will Penterman (R, 38)
No (36)
- Alex Joers (D, 81)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Clint Anderson (D, 45)
- Daniel Riemer (D, 7)
- Darrin Madison (D, 10)
- Dave Considine (D, 81)
- Deb Andraca (D, 23)
- Dora Drake (D, 4)
- Evan Goyke (D, 18)
- Francesca Hong (D, 76)
- Greta Neubauer (D, 66)
- Jenna Jacobson (D, 50)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jimmy Anderson (D, 47)
- Jodi Emerson (D, 91)
- Kalan Haywood (D, 16)
- Katrina Shankland (D, 71)
- Kristina Shelton (D, 90)
- LaKeshia Myers (D, 12)
- Lee Snodgrass (D, 52)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Lori Palmeri (D, 54)
- Marisabel Cabrera (D, 9)
- Melissa Ratcliff (D, 16)
- Mike Bare (D, 80)
- Robyn Vining (D, 13)
- Ryan Clancy (D, 19)
- Samba Baldeh (D, 48)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Shelia Stubbs (D, 78)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Sue Conley (D, 44)
- Supreme Moore Omokunde (D, 17)
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D, 8)
- Tip McGuire (D, 64)
- Tod Ohnstad (D, 65)
Didn't vote (1)
- Tony Kurtz (R, 41)
Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 63 to 35 · Nov 14, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 14, 2024
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
Nov 20, 2023
The governor vetoed it.
-
Nov 16, 2023
Sent to the governor.
-
Nov 14, 2023
The Assembly passed it too, 62 to 36.
-
Nov 7, 2023
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Nov 7, 2023
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 4.
-
Oct 26, 2023
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Oct 17, 2023
The Assembly received it.
-
Oct 17, 2023
The Senate passed it, 21 to 11.
-
Oct 17, 2023
The Senate adopted it, 22 to 10.
-
Oct 16, 2023
“Senators L. Johnson and Spreitzer withdrawn as coauthors” (the official wording)
-
Oct 16, 2023
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 2.
-
Oct 16, 2023
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 4, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Oct 13, 2023
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 11, 2023
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 11, 2023
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 10, 2023
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 10, 2023
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Oct 9, 2023
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Sep 28, 2023 to Oct 5, 2023
2 more senators signed on in support.
-
Sep 21, 2023
Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges.
-
Sep 21, 2023
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Sep 21, 2023 · Senate
Introduced by Committee on Senate Organization, by request of Governor Tony Evers
- Sep 21, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges
- Sep 28, 2023 · Senate
Senator Agard added as a coauthor
- Oct 5, 2023 · Senate
Senator L. Johnson added as a coauthor
- Oct 9, 2023 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 9, 2023 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 9, 2023 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 10, 2023 · Senate
Senator Spreitzer added as a coauthor
- Oct 10, 2023 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 11, 2023 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 11, 2023 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 11, 2023 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 12, 2023 · Senate
Senator Agard withdrawn as a coauthor
- Oct 13, 2023 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 13, 2023 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator LeMahieu
- Oct 16, 2023 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 16, 2023 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 4, Noes 2
- Oct 16, 2023 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development and Technical Colleges, Ayes 4, Noes 2
- Oct 16, 2023 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 16, 2023 · Senate
Senators L. Johnson and Spreitzer withdrawn as coauthors
- Oct 16, 2023 · Senate
Placed on calendar 10-17-2023 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Pfaff, Agard, Carpenter, Hesselbein, L. Johnson, Larson, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer, Taylor and Wirch
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Read a second time
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 21, Noes 10
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 22, Noes 10
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 11
- Oct 17, 2023 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 17, 2023 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Oct 26, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to joint committee on Finance
- Oct 31, 2023 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Report concurrence recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 8, Noes 4
- Nov 7, 2023 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Nov 8, 2023 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-9-2023 by Committee on Rules
- Nov 14, 2023 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 14, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Shelton, Doyle, Haywood, Andraca, Ratcliff, Joers, Ohnstad, Stubbs, Bare, J. Anderson, Shankland, C. Anderson, Madison, Baldeh, Hong, Emerson, Jacobson, Subeck, Billings, Drake, Clancy, Neubauer, McGuire, Conley, Snodgrass, Goyke, Considine, Moore Omokunde, Vining, Sinicki, Myers, Palmeri and Ortiz-Velez
- Nov 14, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 35
- Nov 14, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 14, 2023 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 14, 2023 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 62, Noes 36
- Nov 14, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 15, 2023 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Nov 16, 2023 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)
- Nov 16, 2023 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Nov 16, 2023 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 11-16-2023
- Nov 20, 2023 · Senate
Report vetoed by the Governor on 11-20-2023
- May 13, 2024 · Senate
Placed on calendar 5-14-2024 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 14, 2024 · Senate
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote