Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 1

Changes to the educational assessment program and the school and school district accountability report. (FE)

Topics: Public Instruction, Department of, School: Evaluation and testing

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Mar 28, 2025. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 31, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 54 to 44

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 18 to 14

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Mar 28, 2025.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 18. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Public Instruction is required to annually publish a school and school district accountability report, commonly known as school and school district report cards, for the previous school year. To measure school performance and school district improvement for purposes of the report cards, particularly measures related to pupil achievement in reading and math, DPI uses data derived from pupil performance on assessments administered in the previous school year, including assessments commonly referred to as the Wisconsin Student Assessment System, which includes the Wisconsin Forward Exam, PreACT, the ACT with Writing, and Dynamic Learning Maps.

Under the bill, beginning with report cards published for the school year in which the bill becomes law, for the index system to identify school and school district performance and improvement, also known as the accountability rating categories, DPI must use the same cut scores, score ranges, and corresponding qualitative descriptions that DPI used for report cards published in the 2019-20 school year. In addition, beginning with the WSAS administered in the school year in which the bill becomes law, DPI must do the following:

Read the full summary

1. For the Wisconsin Forward exam in English Language Arts and Mathematics, align cut scores, score ranges, and pupil performance categories to the cut scores, score ranges, and pupil performance categories set by the National Assessment of Educational Progress.

2. For the PreACT and ACT with Writing in English, Reading, and Mathematics, use the same cut scores, score ranges, and pupil performance categories that DPI used for the same assessments administered in the 2021-22 school year. The bill specifically requires DPI to use the terms “below basic,” “basic,” “proficient,” and “advanced” for pupil performance categories on these assessments.

Who's behind it

30 representatives are its ⁠. All 30 are Republicans.

15 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 45 names

Authors (30)

Signed on in support (15)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Education vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 4 · Feb 17, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 9, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 54 to 44 · Feb 19, 2025 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (54)

No (44)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Education vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 14, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 18 to 14 · Mar 18, 2025 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Mar 28, 2025

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Mar 24, 2025

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 21, 2025

    “Attempted to present to the Governor on 3-21-2025 by directive of the Speaker” (the official wording)

  5. Mar 18, 2025

    The Senate passed it too, 18 to 14.

  6. Mar 14, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  7. Mar 13, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Mar 6, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  9. Feb 21, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.

  10. Feb 20, 2025

    The Senate received it.

  11. Feb 19, 2025

    The Assembly passed it, 54 to 44.

  12. Feb 17, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 4.

  13. Feb 14, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Feb 6, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Jan 31, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Education.

  16. Jan 31, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 31, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Wittke, Novak, O'Connor, Kreibich, Tusler, Gundrum, Duchow, Penterman, Murphy, Sortwell, Born, Maxey, Behnke, Melotik, Mursau, Piwowarczyk, Nedweski, Gustafson, Donovan, Green, Dittrich, Dallman, Brill, B. Jacobson, Rodriguez, Spiros, Allen, Knodl, Kaufert and Moses; cosponsored by Senators Jagler, Quinn, Feyen, Wanggaard, Tomczyk, Nass, Bradley, Wimberger, Kapenga, Marklein, James, Jacque, Testin and Cabral-Guevara

  2. Jan 31, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Education

  3. Feb 6, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Feb 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 9, Noes 4

  7. Feb 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to calendar of 2-19-2025 pursuant to Assembly Rule 45 (1)

  8. Feb 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  9. Feb 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  10. Feb 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  11. Feb 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 54, Noes 44

  12. Feb 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Feb 20, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  14. Feb 21, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  15. Mar 6, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Hutton added as a cosponsor

  16. Mar 13, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  17. Mar 14, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  18. Mar 14, 2025 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  19. Mar 14, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  20. Mar 14, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-18-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  21. Mar 18, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  22. Mar 18, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Mar 18, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  24. Mar 18, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 14

  25. Mar 18, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Mar 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  27. Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-20-2025

  28. Mar 21, 2025 · Assembly

    Attempted to present to the Governor on 3-21-2025 by directive of the Speaker

  29. Mar 24, 2025 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-24-2025 by directive of the Speaker

  30. Mar 28, 2025 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-28-2025

  31. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  32. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote