Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 105

The distribution of certain material on the Internet

Topics: Business, Children, Damage (personal injury), Forfeiture, Justice, Department of, News media, Obscenity, Public liability, Trade practice, Youth

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 3, 2026. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 10, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 20, 2025

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 18, 2026

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 3, 2026.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 130. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill prohibits business entities from knowingly and intentionally publishing or distributing material harmful to minors on the Internet on a website that contains a substantial portion of such material, unless the business entity performs a reasonable age verification method to verify the age of individuals attempting to access the website. “Material harmful to minors” is defined in the bill to include material 1) that is designed to appeal to prurient interests, 2) that principally consists of descriptions or depictions of actual or simulated sexual acts or body parts including pubic areas, genitals, buttocks, and female nipples, and 3) that lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. In the bill, a “reasonable age verification method” includes various methods whereby the business entity may verify that an individual seeking to access the material is not a minor. Under the bill, persons that perform reasonable age verification methods may not knowingly retain identifying information of the individual attempting to access the website after the individual’s access has been granted or denied. The bill also requires a business entity that knowingly and intentionally publishes or distributes material harmful to minors on the Internet from a website that contains a substantial portion of such material to prevent persons from accessing the website from an internet protocol address or internet protocol address range that is linked to or known to be a virtual private network system or provider.

In addition, this bill prohibits business entities from knowingly and intentionally publishing or distributing obscene material or an obscene depiction of a purported child on the Internet. “Obscene material” is defined to mean a writing, picture, film, or other recording that the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find appeals to the prurient interest if taken as a whole, describes or shows sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, educational, or scientific value if taken as a whole. “Obscene depiction of a purported child” is defined to mean a visual representation that appears to depict an actual child in the form of a photograph, film, motion picture, or digital or computer-generated image or picture, that the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find appeals to prurient interests if taken as a whole, describes or shows sexually explicit conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, educational, or scientific value if taken as a whole.

Read the full summary

A person that violates the provisions of the bill may be subject to civil liability for damages and the payment of court costs and reasonable attorney fees. Sovereign immunity may not be raised as an affirmative defense to a civil action brought alleging a violation of a provision of the bill.

Who's behind it

13 representatives are its ⁠. All 13 are Republicans.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 18 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (5)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on State Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 2 · Mar 13, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 69 to 22 · Mar 20, 2025 · 6 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (69)

Didn't vote (6)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Mental Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Nov 12, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 3, 2026

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 2, 2026

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 19, 2026

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  5. Feb 18, 2026

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Feb 18, 2026

    The Senate passed it too.

  7. Feb 18, 2026

    The Senate adopted it.

  8. Nov 12, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  9. Oct 8, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Mar 21, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families.

  11. Mar 20, 2025

    The Senate received it.

  12. Mar 20, 2025

    The Assembly passed it, 69 to 22.

  13. Mar 20, 2025

    The Assembly adopted it.

  14. Mar 17, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Mar 13, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  16. Mar 13, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 2.

  17. Mar 12, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  18. Mar 10, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs.

  19. Mar 10, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 10, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Goeben, B. Jacobson, Penterman, Kreibich, Dittrich, Allen, Knodl, Wichgers, Murphy, Brill, Mursau, Behnke and Piwowarczyk; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Jacque, Feyen and Nass

  2. Mar 10, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs

  3. Mar 12, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 2

  6. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Mar 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative O'Connor added as a coauthor

  8. Mar 18, 2025 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-20-2025 by Committee on Rules

  9. Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goeben

  11. Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  12. Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 69, Noes 22, Paired 2

  15. Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Mar 20, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  17. Mar 21, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families

  18. Oct 8, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  19. Nov 12, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  20. Nov 12, 2025 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  21. Nov 12, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Dec 3, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Wanggaard

  23. Jan 7, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Wanggaard

  24. Feb 17, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-18-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  25. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  27. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  28. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  30. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended

  31. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 2 adopted)

  33. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Senate Amendment 2 concurred in

  34. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  35. Feb 23, 2026 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  36. Feb 23, 2026 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 1)

  37. Feb 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-23-2026

  38. Apr 2, 2026 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026

  39. Apr 3, 2026 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-3-2026

  40. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  41. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote