Assembly Bill 105
The distribution of certain material on the Internet
Topics: Business, Children, Damage (personal injury), Forfeiture, Justice, Department of, News media, Obscenity, Public liability, Trade practice, Youth
Vetoed by the governor
Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 3, 2026. Lawmakers did not , so it stands.
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 10, 2025
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 20, 2025
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 18, 2026
-
Governor, stopped here
Vetoed Apr 3, 2026.
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 130. That version died when the session ended.
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill prohibits business entities from knowingly and intentionally publishing or distributing material harmful to minors on the Internet on a website that contains a substantial portion of such material, unless the business entity performs a reasonable age verification method to verify the age of individuals attempting to access the website. “Material harmful to minors” is defined in the bill to include material 1) that is designed to appeal to prurient interests, 2) that principally consists of descriptions or depictions of actual or simulated sexual acts or body parts including pubic areas, genitals, buttocks, and female nipples, and 3) that lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. In the bill, a “reasonable age verification method” includes various methods whereby the business entity may verify that an individual seeking to access the material is not a minor. Under the bill, persons that perform reasonable age verification methods may not knowingly retain identifying information of the individual attempting to access the website after the individual’s access has been granted or denied. The bill also requires a business entity that knowingly and intentionally publishes or distributes material harmful to minors on the Internet from a website that contains a substantial portion of such material to prevent persons from accessing the website from an internet protocol address or internet protocol address range that is linked to or known to be a virtual private network system or provider.
In addition, this bill prohibits business entities from knowingly and intentionally publishing or distributing obscene material or an obscene depiction of a purported child on the Internet. “Obscene material” is defined to mean a writing, picture, film, or other recording that the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find appeals to the prurient interest if taken as a whole, describes or shows sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, educational, or scientific value if taken as a whole. “Obscene depiction of a purported child” is defined to mean a visual representation that appears to depict an actual child in the form of a photograph, film, motion picture, or digital or computer-generated image or picture, that the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find appeals to prurient interests if taken as a whole, describes or shows sexually explicit conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, educational, or scientific value if taken as a whole.
Read the full summary Show less
A person that violates the provisions of the bill may be subject to civil liability for damages and the payment of court costs and reasonable attorney fees. Sovereign immunity may not be raised as an affirmative defense to a civil action brought alleging a violation of a provision of the bill.
Who's behind it
13 representatives are its . All 13 are Republicans.
5 more lawmakers .
See all 18 names Hide the names
Authors (13)
- Scott Allen · Republican, Assembly
- Brent Jacobson · Republican, Assembly
- Elijah Behnke · Republican, Assembly
- Lindee Brill · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- Joy Goeben · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Kreibich · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Will Penterman · Republican, Assembly
- Jim Piwowarczyk · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (5)
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Van Wanggaard · Republican, Senate
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on State Affairs vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 2 · Mar 13, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 69 to 22 · Mar 20, 2025 · 6 didn't vote
See how each of the 97 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (69)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alex Dallman (R, 39)
- Amaad Rivera-Wagner (D, 90)
- Amanda Nedweski (R, 32)
- Ann Roe (D, 44)
- Barbara Dittrich (R, 99)
- Ben Franklin (R, 88)
- Bob Donovan (R, 61)
- Bob Wittke (R, 63)
- Brent Jacobson (R, 87)
- Calvin Callahan (R, 35)
- Chanz Green (R, 74)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Clint Moses (R, 92)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dave Armstrong (R, 67)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Deb Andraca (D, 23)
- Duke Tucker (R, 75)
- Elijah Behnke (R, 6)
- Gus Gustafson (R, 55)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jenna Jacobson (D, 50)
- Jerry O'Connor (R, 60)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jim Piwowarczyk (R, 98)
- Jodi Emerson (D, 91)
- Joe Sheehan (D, 26)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Joy Goeben (R, 5)
- Karen DeSanto (D, 40)
- Karen Hurd (R, 69)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lindee Brill (R, 27)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Lori Palmeri (D, 54)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Maureen McCarville (D, 42)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Melotik (R, 22)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Randy Udell (D, 47)
- Rick Gundrum (R, 58)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Kreibich (R, 28)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Ryan Spaude (D, 89)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Sequanna Taylor (D, 11)
- Shelia Stubbs (D, 78)
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D, 8)
- Tara Johnson (D, 96)
- Tip McGuire (D, 64)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Tony Kurtz (R, 41)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Vinnie Miresse (D, 71)
No (22)
- Alex Joers (D, 81)
- Andrew Hysell (D, 48)
- Angela Stroud (D, 73)
- Angelina Cruz (D, 62)
- Angelito Tenorio (D, 14)
- Ben DeSmidt (D, 65)
- Brienne Brown (D, 43)
- Christian Phelps (D, 93)
- Clint Anderson (D, 45)
- Darrin Madison (D, 10)
- Francesca Hong (D, 76)
- Greta Neubauer (D, 66)
- Joan Fitzgerald (D, 46)
- Kalan Haywood (D, 16)
- Karen Kirsch (D, 7)
- Lee Snodgrass (D, 52)
- Margaret Arney (D, 18)
- Mike Bare (D, 80)
- Priscilla Prado (D, 9)
- Renuka Mayadev (D, 77)
- Ryan Clancy (D, 19)
- Supreme Moore Omokunde (D, 17)
Didn't vote (6)
- Dave Maxey (R, 83)
- Robyn Vining (D, 13)
- Russell Goodwin (D, 12)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Mental Health vote to recommend it
Passed, 3 to 2 · Nov 12, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 13, 2026
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
Apr 3, 2026
The governor vetoed it.
-
Apr 2, 2026
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 19, 2026
“Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)
-
Feb 18, 2026
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 18, 2026
The Senate passed it too.
-
Feb 18, 2026
The Senate adopted it.
-
Nov 12, 2025
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.
-
Oct 8, 2025
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 21, 2025
Sent to the Senate Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families.
-
Mar 20, 2025
The Senate received it.
-
Mar 20, 2025
The Assembly passed it, 69 to 22.
-
Mar 20, 2025
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Mar 17, 2025
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Mar 13, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 13, 2025
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 2.
-
Mar 12, 2025
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 10, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs.
-
Mar 10, 2025
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 10, 2025 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Goeben, B. Jacobson, Penterman, Kreibich, Dittrich, Allen, Knodl, Wichgers, Murphy, Brill, Mursau, Behnke and Piwowarczyk; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Jacque, Feyen and Nass
- Mar 10, 2025 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs
- Mar 12, 2025 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 2
- Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 17, 2025 · Assembly
Representative O'Connor added as a coauthor
- Mar 18, 2025 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-20-2025 by Committee on Rules
- Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Goeben
- Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 69, Noes 22, Paired 2
- Mar 20, 2025 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 20, 2025 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 21, 2025 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families
- Oct 8, 2025 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Nov 12, 2025 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Nov 12, 2025 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Nov 12, 2025 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Dec 3, 2025 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Wanggaard
- Jan 7, 2026 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Wanggaard
- Feb 17, 2026 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-18-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in as amended
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly
Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 2 adopted)
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Senate Amendment 2 concurred in
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2026 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Feb 23, 2026 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 1)
- Feb 23, 2026 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 2-23-2026
- Apr 2, 2026 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026
- Apr 3, 2026 · Assembly
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-3-2026
- May 12, 2026 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 13, 2026 · Assembly
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote