Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 1070

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the restrictiveness of shoreland zoning ordinances. (FE)

County — Board Natural resources department of — Environmental protection Shoreland zoning

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes various changes to limits on the restrictiveness of shoreland zoning ordinances.

Current law requires a county to enact shoreland zoning ordinances for all shorelands in its unincorporated area and requires those ordinances to meet shoreland zoning standards established by the Department of Natural Resources by rule. Current law generally defines a shoreland to be an area within a specified distance from the edge of a navigable water.

This bill eliminates a provision under current law that prohibits a county shoreland zoning ordinance from regulating a matter more restrictively than the matter is regulated by a shoreland zoning standard promulgated by DNR. The bill also eliminates a provision under current law that prohibits a county shoreland zoning ordinance from regulating the construction of a structure on a substandard lot in a manner that is more restrictive than the DNR shoreland zoning standards for substandard lots.

Current law provides that a county board of adjustment has authority to decide upon variances and appeals from county decisions regarding shorelands within the county. The bill eliminates a current law exception that prohibits DNR from appealing a county decision to grant or deny a variance relating to shoreland zoning. Under current law, DNR may only, upon the request of a county board of adjustment, issue an opinion on whether a variance should be granted or denied.

Current law prohibits DNR and counties from impairing the interest of a landowner in shoreland property by establishing a shoreland zoning standard or enacting or enforcing a shoreland zoning ordinance that does any of a number of specified things. The bill removes the language prohibiting the impairment of the interest of a landowner in shoreland property, but leaves the prohibition on establishing a shoreland zoning standard or enacting or enforcing a shoreland zoning ordinance.

DNR and counties may not, under current law, use a shoreland zoning standard or ordinance to require any approval or impose any fee or mitigation requirement for, or otherwise prohibit or regulate, any of the following:

1. The maintenance, repair, replacement, restoration, rebuilding, or remodeling of all or any part of certain nonconforming structures or structures legally within the shoreland setback area if the activity does not expand the footprint of the structure.

2. The vertical expansion of certain nonconforming structures or structures legally within the shoreland setback area unless the expansion would extend more than 35 feet above grade level.

The bill permits DNR and counties to impose a fee with respect to these activities.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Emerson (D) , Miresse (D) , Stroud (D) , Stubbs (D)

1 cosponsors

Smith (D)

Registered lobbying interests · 2

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Full history

  1. Feb 26, 2026 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Miresse, Stroud, Emerson and Stubbs; cosponsored by Senator Smith

  2. Feb 26, 2026 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate

  3. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  4. Apr 9, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received