Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 1141

Public financing of campaigns for the offices of justice of the supreme court, court of appeals judge, and circuit court judge, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Topics: Elections: Campaign expense, Income tax: Return, Judge, Supreme Court, Trust fund

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 13, 2026

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 1, 2026: “Fiscal estimate received”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections. The committee's chair at the time was Dave Maxey. Chairs decide which bills get a hearing. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 1070. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill creates a democracy trust fund under which eligible candidates for the offices of justice of the supreme court, court of appeals judge, and circuit court judge may receive public grants derived from general purpose revenues to finance their campaigns.

The bill provides that a candidate for the office of justice of the supreme court, court of appeals judge, or circuit court judge may qualify for public financing from the democracy trust fund to finance a campaign in a primary or election by receiving qualifying contributions from at least 1,000 separate contributors who are electors of this state in amounts of not less than $5 nor more than $100 in an aggregate amount of at least $5,000 but not more than $50,000. A candidate who accepts public financing may also accept “seed money" contributions from electors of this state in amounts of $100 or less, subject to aggregate limitations, and may contribute personal funds in specified amounts during specified periods. In order to qualify for a public financing benefit for the primary, a candidate at the spring primary must have an opponent who qualifies to have his or her name appear on the ballot at the primary, and in order to qualify for a public financing benefit for the spring election, a candidate at the election must have an opponent who qualifies to have his or her name appear on the ballot at the election. A candidate who accepts a public financing benefit may not accept any contributions other than qualifying and seed money contributions and contributions from personal funds within the limitations permitted. Public financing benefits for eligible candidates for court of appeals judge or circuit court judge are $100,000 in the spring primary and $300,000 in the spring election. Public financing benefits for eligible candidates for justice of the supreme court are $1,000,000 in the spring primary and $3,000,000 in the spring election. The benefits are subject to a biennial cost of living adjustment. The bill also imposes a limitation on disbursements by a candidate who accepts a public financing benefit that equals the total public financing benefit allocated to the candidate and the total qualifying and seed money contributions lawfully accepted by the candidate.

Read the full summary

Currently, no public financing is available to finance the campaigns of candidates for the office of justice of the supreme court, court of appeals judge, or circuit court judge.

Under the bill, public financing benefits are financed through an individual income tax “checkoff." Every individual filing a state income tax return who has a tax liability or is entitled to a tax refund may direct that $5 of general purpose revenue be transferred to the democracy trust fund. Individuals filing a joint return may separately choose whether to direct that the $5 transfer be made. The designation does not increase an individual's tax liability nor reduce an individual's refund. If the total designations do not generate sufficient general purpose revenues to fully fund the costs of public grants and administration of the democracy trust fund, the bill appropriates additional general purpose revenues to finance those costs.

Who's behind it

3 representatives are its ⁠. All 3 are Democrats.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 8 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. May 1, 2026

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  2. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  3. Mar 19, 2026

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  4. Mar 13, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections.

  5. Mar 13, 2026

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Bare, Sinicki and Udell; cosponsored by Senators Roys, Dassler-Alfheim and Ratcliff

  2. Mar 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Campaigns and Elections

  3. Mar 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Palmeri added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Subeck added as a coauthor

  5. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  6. May 1, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate