Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 169

Various changes to the unemployment insurance law. (FE)

Topics: Employment, Unemployment insurance, Workforce Development, Department of

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Oct 31, 2025. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 8, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 53 to 42

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 18 to 15

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Oct 31, 2025.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 196. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes regarding the unemployment insurance (UI) law, which is administered by the Department of Workforce Development.

Suitable work; work search Current law requires that, as a condition of being eligible for UI benefits for a given week, a claimant must 1) be able to work and available for work; 2) register for work in the manner prescribed by DWD; and 3) conduct a reasonable search for suitable work. Separately, current law also makes a claimant ineligible for UI benefits if a claimant fails, without good cause, to accept suitable work when offered.

Read the full summary

The bill provides that an employer may report to DWD whenever 1) an individual declines a job interview or job offer; 2) an individual fails to respond to a job interview offer or job offer; 3) an individual cancels or fails to attend a scheduled job interview without attempting to reschedule the job interview; 4) a UI claimant is unavailable for, or unable to perform, work actually available within a given week; or 5) under certain circumstances, the employer recalls a former employee receiving UI benefits who fails to return to work. The bill requires DWD to consider these reports in determining claimants’ attachment to the labor market. The bill also provides that a UI claimant is not considered to have conducted a reasonable search for suitable work in a given week, and is therefore ineligible for benefits for that week, if the claimant declined a job interview, failed to respond to a job interview offer, or canceled or failed to attend a job interview in that week. The bill, however, provides that a report of a canceled or missed interview is to be disregarded if the claimant demonstrates that he or she promptly attempted to reschedule the interview and allows reports to be disregarded upon certain showings by a claimant. The bill requires a claimant to provide weekly verification of all job offers, job interview offers, recalls to return to work, and any other offers of work received or responded to by the claimant since the prior week’s verification, as further prescribed by DWD, and requires DWD to investigate reports from employers as needed to determine their effect on claimants’ eligibility for benefits. A disqualification of a claimant from receiving benefits for a given week based upon the claimant’s failure to conduct a reasonable search for suitable work does not reduce the claimant’s total UI benefit entitlement and does not preclude the claimant from receiving UI benefits in subsequent weeks, if the claimant is otherwise eligible for those weeks.

The bill requires DWD to include information on reports submitted by employers under the bill in its annual UI fraud report made to the Council on Unemployment Insurance, including actions taken by DWD in response to the reports and their effect on claimants’ eligibility for benefits. In addition, the bill requires that this annual fraud report be submitted to the appropriate standing committees of the legislature.

The bill requires DWD to have in effect methods to address any circumstances in which a claimant for UI benefits fails to return to work or to accept suitable work without good cause or is unavailable for work or unable to work, including reporting methods for employers and a notice from DWD to claimants about the laws governing such circumstances.

Recovery of overpayments Current law allows DWD to act to recover overpayments in certain circumstances and allows overpayments to be required to be repaid in cases where an individual makes misrepresentations to obtain benefits in the name of another person. This bill makes such recoveries mandatory, instead of permissive.

Who's behind it

11 representatives are its ⁠. All 11 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Workforce Development vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 3 · Apr 17, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Labor, and Integrated Employment, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 53 to 42 · Apr 22, 2025 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (53)

No (42)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Aug 19, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 18 to 15 · Oct 14, 2025

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Oct 31, 2025

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Oct 29, 2025

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Oct 14, 2025

    The Senate passed it too, 18 to 15.

  5. Aug 19, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  6. May 6, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Apr 24, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development.

  8. Apr 23, 2025

    The Senate received it.

  9. Apr 22, 2025

    The Assembly passed it, 53 to 42.

  10. Apr 22, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Apr 17, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Apr 17, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 3.

  13. Apr 9, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Apr 8, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Workforce Development, Labor, and Integrated Employment.

  15. Apr 8, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 8, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Knodl, B. Jacobson, Behnke, Dittrich, Duchow, Green, Gundrum, Murphy, O'Connor, Penterman and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Tomczyk, Cabral-Guevara, Marklein and Kapenga

  2. Apr 8, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development, Labor, and Integrated Employment

  3. Apr 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Apr 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Labor, and Integrated Employment, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  6. Apr 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Apr 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2025 by Committee on Rules

  8. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 42, Paired 2

  13. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Apr 23, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Apr 24, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development

  16. May 6, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  17. Aug 19, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  18. Aug 19, 2025 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  19. Aug 19, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  20. Oct 13, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-14-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  21. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  22. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  24. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  25. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Oct 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  27. Oct 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 10-20-2025

  28. Oct 29, 2025 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 10-29-2025

  29. Oct 31, 2025 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 10-31-2025

  30. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  31. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote