Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 169

Vetoed Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: various changes to the unemployment insurance law. (FE)

Employment Employment relations commission Unemployment insurance Unincorporated territory Workforce development department of Workforce training

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, stopped here
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes various changes regarding the unemployment insurance (UI) law, which is administered by the Department of Workforce Development.

Suitable work; work search

Current law requires that, as a condition of being eligible for UI benefits for a given week, a claimant must 1) be able to work and available for work; 2) register for work in the manner prescribed by DWD; and 3) conduct a reasonable search for suitable work. Separately, current law also makes a claimant ineligible for UI benefits if a claimant fails, without good cause, to accept suitable work when offered.

The bill provides that an employer may report to DWD whenever 1) an individual declines a job interview or job offer; 2) an individual fails to respond to a job interview offer or job offer; 3) an individual cancels or fails to attend a scheduled job interview without attempting to reschedule the job interview; 4) a UI claimant is unavailable for, or unable to perform, work actually available within a given week; or 5) under certain circumstances, the employer recalls a former employee receiving UI benefits who fails to return to work. The bill requires DWD to consider these reports in determining claimants’ attachment to the labor market. The bill also provides that a UI claimant is not considered to have conducted a reasonable search for suitable work in a given week, and is therefore ineligible for benefits for that week, if the claimant declined a job interview, failed to respond to a job interview offer, or canceled or failed to attend a job interview in that week. The bill, however, provides that a report of a canceled or missed interview is to be disregarded if the claimant demonstrates that he or she promptly attempted to reschedule the interview and allows reports to be disregarded upon certain showings by a claimant. The bill requires a claimant to provide weekly verification of all job offers, job interview offers, recalls to return to work, and any other offers of work received or responded to by the claimant since the prior week’s verification, as further prescribed by DWD, and requires DWD to investigate reports from employers as needed to determine their effect on claimants’ eligibility for benefits. A disqualification of a claimant from receiving benefits for a given week based upon the claimant’s failure to conduct a reasonable search for suitable work does not reduce the claimant’s total UI benefit entitlement and does not preclude the claimant from receiving UI benefits in subsequent weeks, if the claimant is otherwise eligible for those weeks.

The bill requires DWD to include information on reports submitted by employers under the bill in its annual UI fraud report made to the Council on Unemployment Insurance, including actions taken by DWD in response to the reports and their effect on claimants’ eligibility for benefits. In addition, the bill requires that this annual fraud report be submitted to the appropriate standing committees of the legislature.

The bill requires DWD to have in effect methods to address any circumstances in which a claimant for UI benefits fails to return to work or to accept suitable work without good cause or is unavailable for work or unable to work, including reporting methods for employers and a notice from DWD to claimants about the laws governing such circumstances.

Recovery of overpayments

Current law allows DWD to act to recover overpayments in certain circumstances and allows overpayments to be required to be repaid in cases where an individual makes misrepresentations to obtain benefits in the name of another person. This bill makes such recoveries mandatory, instead of permissive.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: B. Jacobson (R) , Behnke (R) , Dittrich (R) , Duchow (R) , Green (R) , Gundrum (R) , Knodl (R) , Murphy (R) , O'Connor (R) , Penterman (R) , Wichgers (R)

4 cosponsors

Cabral-Guevara (R) , Kapenga (R) , Marklein (R) , Tomczyk (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 17

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Labor, and Integrated Employment, Ayes 6, Noes 3

Passed 6–3 Apr 17, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: PASSAGE

Passed 53–42 Apr 22, 2025 official source full page

Aye · 53

Nay · 42

Not voting · 2

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Aug 19, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Apr 8, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Knodl, B. Jacobson, Behnke, Dittrich, Duchow, Green, Gundrum, Murphy, O'Connor, Penterman and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Tomczyk, Cabral-Guevara, Marklein and Kapenga

  2. Apr 8, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development, Labor, and Integrated Employment

  3. Apr 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Apr 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Labor, and Integrated Employment, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  6. Apr 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Apr 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2025 by Committee on Rules

  8. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  9. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 42, Paired 2

  10. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  11. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 23, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Apr 24, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development

  16. May 6, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  17. Aug 19, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  18. Aug 19, 2025 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  19. Aug 19, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  20. Oct 13, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-14-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  21. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  22. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  24. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  25. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Oct 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  27. Oct 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 10-20-2025

  28. Oct 29, 2025 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 10-29-2025

  29. Oct 31, 2025 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 10-31-2025

  30. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  31. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82