Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 204

Creating a video game production tax credit and making an appropriation. (FE)

Topics: Amusement, Franchise: Taxation, Income tax: Credit

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 23, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 204. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill creates a refundable video game production income and franchise tax credit. The credit is equal to the sum of the following: 1) 30 percent of the eligible wages paid by the claimant directly relating to developing, producing, or creating a video game product; and 2) 30 percent of the claimant’s eligible expenditures directly relating to developing, producing, or creating a video game product. Under the bill, “video game product” means, subject to certain exceptions, an electronic game developed for commercial distribution and entertainment that involves interaction with a used interface to generate visual feedback on a video device. “Video game product” does not include social media, gambling products, or products with obscene content. The bill also defines “eligible expenditures” as expenditures directly relating to developing, producing, or creating a video game product but excludes various specified expenditures, such as payments for royalties, capital expenditures, management and administrative expenses, marketing expenses, and interest. To claim the credit for a tax year, a person must file an application with the Department of Revenue and receive a certificate of eligibility for the credit. To receive a certificate, an applicant must submit an audit of its eligible expenditures to DOR. The credit under the bill is refundable, which means that if the credit exceeds the claimant’s tax liability, the claimant will receive the difference as a refund check.

Who's behind it

7 representatives are its ⁠. 6 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Science vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 0 · Jun 6, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Science vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 1 · Jun 6, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 5, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 11 to 4 · Feb 4, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 11 to 4 · Feb 4, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 4, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Feb 4, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 4.

  4. Jan 30, 2026

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  5. Oct 23, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Jun 6, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Jun 6, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 1.

  8. May 12, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. May 7, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Apr 30, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. Apr 23, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Science, Technology, and AI.

  12. Apr 23, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 23, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Moses, Zimmerman, Goodwin, Gundrum, Callahan, Swearingen and Behnke; cosponsored by Senators Testin and Feyen

  2. Apr 23, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Science, Technology, and AI

  3. Apr 30, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative O'Connor added as a coauthor

  4. May 7, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. May 12, 2025 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  6. May 12, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jun 3, 2025 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Moses

  8. Jun 4, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Jun 6, 2025 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  10. Jun 6, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 5, Noes 1

  11. Jun 6, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Oct 23, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Jan 30, 2026 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Rules and referred to joint committee on Finance pursuant to Assembly Rule 24 (3)(a)

  14. Feb 3, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken by joint committee on Finance

  15. Feb 3, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Joint Committee on Finance

  16. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4

  17. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4

  18. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  19. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote