Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 22

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: limitations on the total value of taxable property that may be included in, and the lifespan of, a tax incremental financing district created in the city of Middleton. (FE)

Dane county Property tax

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the equalized value of taxable property of a new or amended tax incremental district (TID) plus the value increment of all existing TIDs in a city or village may not exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village. Under this bill, the 12 percent rule does not apply to TID Number 6 created by the city of Middleton if the district is created before June 1, 2025.

Also under current law, a city or village may extend the life of a TID for up to one year for housing stock improvement if all of the following occur:

1. The city or village pays off all of the TID’s project costs.

2. The city or village adopts a resolution stating that it intends to extend the life of the TID, the number of months it intends to do so, and how it intends to improve housing stock.

3. The city or village notifies DOR.

Under the bill, a housing stock improvement extension may not be exercised with regard to TID Number 6 in the city of Middleton.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Armstrong (R) , Arney (D) , Bare (D) , DeSmidt (D) , Hysell (D) , Joers (D) , Kurtz (R) , Novak (R) , Palmeri (D) , Roe (D) , Tenorio (D) , Udell (D)

7 cosponsors

Hesselbein (D) , J. Jacobson (D) , McCarville (D) , O'Connor (R) , Ratcliff (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Testin (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 3

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Apr 15, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 6, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kurtz, Novak, Joers, Bare, Armstrong, Arney, DeSmidt, Hysell, Palmeri, Tenorio, Udell and Roe; cosponsored by Senators Testin, Hesselbein, Ratcliff and Spreitzer

  2. Feb 6, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Local Government

  3. Feb 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative McCarville added as a coauthor

  4. Feb 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 21, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a coauthor

  6. Mar 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Apr 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  9. Apr 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. May 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Rules and referred to calendar of 5-13-2025

  11. May 12, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative O'Connor added as a coauthor

  12. May 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  13. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1