Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 258

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: license eligibility and restriction extensions relating to ignition interlock devices.

Drunken driving Motor vehicle — Drivers license Motor vehicle — Equipment

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, if a person is convicted of a second or subsequent offense related to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant or other drug, with a prohibited alcohol concentration, or with a measurable amount of a controlled substance in their blood (OWI offense), a court must order the person’s operating privilege restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition interlock device (IID). The restriction begins on the date of the IID order and lasts for at least one year, but no longer than the maximum operating privilege revocation period authorized for the refusal or violation.

Under the bill, the restriction of a person’s operating privilege under an IID order must be extended by 180 days for each occurrence of any of the following events detected by an IID: 1) three or more violations within a 60-day period, 2) tampering with or attempting to circumvent the IID, or 3) removing the IID authorization.

Under current law, a person whose operating privilege is administratively revoked for a first offense of refusing a test may apply for an occupational license after 30 days. The bill eliminates the 30-day waiting period and provides that a person may apply for an occupational license upon installation of an IID on any motor vehicle that the person operates.

Under current law, when a person is convicted of an OWI offense, the convicting court orders the person’s operating privilege be revoked. The length of time for a court-ordered revocation increases with each subsequent OWI offense, as does the waiting period before the person may apply for an occupational license. In general, a person with prior OWI offenses may apply after 45 days. The bill eliminates the 45-day waiting period and provides that a person may apply for an occupational license upon installation of an IID on each motor vehicle that the person operates.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Andraca (D) , Brooks (R) , Dittrich (R) , Goeben (R) , Gundrum (R) , Kaufert (R) , Knodl (R) , Maxey (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , O'Connor (R) , Penterman (R) , Piwowarczyk (R) , Snyder (R) , Spiros (R) , Subeck (D)

8 cosponsors

B. Jacobson (R) , Feyen (R) , Hutton (R) , J. Jacobson (D) , Larson (D) , Pfaff (D) , Tomczyk (R) , Wanggaard (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 4

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Jan 15, 2026 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Jan 15, 2026 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. May 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Spiros, Kaufert, Andraca, Brooks, Dittrich, Goeben, Gundrum, Knodl, Maxey, Murphy, Mursau, O'Connor, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Snyder and Subeck; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Pfaff, Feyen, Hutton, Larson and Tomczyk

  2. May 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Aug 7, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a coauthor

  4. Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Spiros

  6. Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative B. Jacobson added as a coauthor

  7. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  9. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  10. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:17 PM on 2-18-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 13

  12. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  13. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1