Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 296

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: eliminating the 13-week limit on the garnishment of earnings of certain debtors.

Creditor Crime victim Debt and debtors Garnishment

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill eliminates the 13-week limit imposed on the garnishment of earnings of certain debtors. Under current law, a creditor may file a garnishment notice with a court and pay a fee to a garnishee for the purpose of collecting an unsatisfied judgment for money damages from earnings owed to the debtor by the garnishee. Current law limits the number of weeks in which the earnings of a debtor, other than a debtor who is an employee of the state or a political subdivision of the state, may be garnisheed to 13 weeks.

Under current law, a court-ordered assignment of a debtor’s earnings for support or maintenance in a family law matter takes priority over an earnings garnishment. The bill provides that a court-ordered earnings garnishment to satisfy an order for restitution in a criminal matter takes priority over other earnings garnishments but does not have priority over an assignment in a family law matter.

The bill makes various other changes, including changes to account for the increased length of time a garnishment may continue. For example, the bill requires a creditor to provide additional notices to a debtor when a garnishment extends beyond a 13-week period.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Dittrich (R) , Gundrum (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kitchens (R) , Knodl (R) , Maxey (R) , Melotik (R) , Murphy (R) , O'Connor (R) , Piwowarczyk (R) , Steffen (R) , Tusler (R) , Wichgers (R)

2 cosponsors

Hutton (R) , Wanggaard (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 6

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 0

Passed 10–0 Nov 20, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 3

Passed 7–3 Nov 20, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. May 30, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tusler, Dittrich, Gundrum, Kaufert, Kitchens, Knodl, Maxey, Melotik, Murphy, O'Connor, Piwowarczyk, Steffen and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Hutton and Wanggaard

  2. May 30, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs

  3. Sep 5, 2025 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Tusler

  4. Oct 8, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Nov 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  7. Nov 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 3

  8. Nov 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-15-2026 by Committee on Rules

  10. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Tusler

  11. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  12. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1