Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 416

A grant for modernization of a dam in the village of Rothschild. (FE)

Topics: Forestry, Marathon County, Natural Resources, Department of: Environmental protection, Waterways and water power

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 15, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 421. That version became law.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under 2025 Act 15 , the biennial budget bill, the Joint Committee on Finance was appropriated $42,000,000 to supplement an appropriation to the Department of Natural Resources for providing financial assistance for the modernization of a dam on the Wisconsin River in the village of Rothschild.

This bill requires DNR to provide $42,000,000 to Domtar Paper Company, LLC, (Domtar) for modernization of a dam associated with the company’s mill in the village of Rothschild. The bill provides that, if Domtar does not commence the dam modernization project by December 31, 2026, it must return to the state the full amount of the financial assistance Domtar received from the state. The bill also provides that, if Domtar sells either its mill in the village of Rothschild or its mill in the city of Nekoosa prior to the completion of the dam modernization project, Domtar must return to the state any unexpended amount of the financial assistance Domtar received from the state.

Read the full summary

The bill also provides that, if the total amount of financial assistance for the dam modernization project that Domtar receives from all sources exceeds two-thirds of the cost of the project, Domtar must return to the state the difference between two-thirds of the cost of the project and the total amount of financial assistance Domtar received for the project.

Finally, the bill also provides that Domtar must agree to invest a total of $100,000,000 in north central Wisconsin via its manufacturing facilities in the village of Rothschild and the city of Nekoosa within three years and to use roundwood and wood chips only from Wisconsin producers to produce products at its facilities in the village of Rothschild. If Domtar fails to comply with either requirement, they must return to the state the full amount of financial assistance Domtar received from the state.

Who's behind it

5 representatives are its ⁠. All 5 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 9 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Forestry vote to recommend it

Passed, 11 to 0 · Nov 7, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Forestry, Parks and Outdoor Recreation, Ayes 11, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 18, 2025

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  3. Nov 7, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Nov 7, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 0.

  5. Oct 16, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Oct 9, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Oct 8, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Sep 15, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Forestry, Parks and Outdoor Recreation.

  9. Sep 15, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Krug, Hurd, B. Jacobson, Snyder and Spiros; cosponsored by Senators Tomczyk and Testin

  2. Sep 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Forestry, Parks and Outdoor Recreation

  3. Oct 8, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Miresse added as a coauthor

  6. Nov 4, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Nov 7, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Forestry, Parks and Outdoor Recreation, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  8. Nov 7, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Nov 18, 2025 · Assembly

    Senator Ratcliff added as a cosponsor

  10. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote