Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 417

Emergency testing of a criminal defendant for certain diseases. (FE)

Topics: Court: Officers, Crime and criminals, Disease, District attorney, Police, Prison

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 15, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 419. That version became law.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, in a criminal case for throwing or expelling bodily substances at a public safety worker or prosecutor or at specified individuals in a prison, if the district attorney has probable cause to believe that the act carried a potential for transmitting a communicable disease to the victim and involved the defendant’s blood, semen, vomit, saliva, urine, or feces or other bodily substance of the defendant, the district attorney must apply to the circuit court for an order to require the defendant to submit to testing to detect the presence of communicable diseases, and those results must be disclosed to the victim if certain criteria are met.

This bill amends the process under current law to apply to any crime if the district attorney has probable cause to believe that the act carried a potential for transmitting a communicable disease to a public safety worker, prosecutor, or correctional staff member and involved the defendant’s blood, semen, vomit, saliva, urine, or feces or other bodily substance of the defendant.

Read the full summary

The bill also creates an expedited process for testing when it is requested by a public safety worker, prosecutor, or correctional staff member. Under the bill, the district attorney may, at any time, regardless of whether criminal proceedings have commenced, apply to the circuit court for a waiver of the normal hearing requirement and for an emergency order to require the defendant to immediately submit to testing. Under the bill, the district attorney may make such an application only if the district attorney has probable cause to believe that waiving the hearing and expediting a defendant to submit to testing will prevent a public safety worker, prosecutor, or correctional staff member from experiencing bodily harm that could result from delaying the test. Under the bill, the court must immediately hear the application for an emergency order and grant the order if it finds that the existing requirements for such an order are met and also finds that waiving the hearing and expediting the defendant to submit to testing will prevent a public safety worker, prosecutor, or correctional staff member from experiencing bodily harm that could result from delaying the test.

The bill also provides that if a defendant is found guilty of a crime for which the court has required the defendant to submit to communicable disease testing, the defendant must be required to pay, as restitution, the costs of any communicable disease testing that was ordered.

Who's behind it

10 representatives are its ⁠. 9 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 0 · Oct 16, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 15 to 0 · Oct 16, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 23, 2026 to Mar 19, 2026

    5 more representatives signed on in support.

  3. Nov 13, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Nov 11, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Oct 16, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Oct 16, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.

  7. Oct 1, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Sep 15, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.

  9. Sep 15, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Melotik, Behnke, Dittrich, Kaufert, Kreibich, Murphy, Mursau, Piwowarczyk, Sheehan and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Feyen and Marklein

  2. Sep 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  3. Sep 25, 2025 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Melotik

  4. Sep 29, 2025 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Melotik

  5. Oct 1, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 8, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  8. Oct 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  9. Oct 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Nov 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Nov 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Jan 8, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-13-2026 by Committee on Rules

  13. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  14. Jan 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Doyle added as a coauthor

  15. Mar 6, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Brown added as a coauthor

  16. Mar 16, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Billings added as a coauthor

  17. Mar 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Subeck added as a coauthor

  18. Mar 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Emerson added as a coauthor

  19. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote