Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 439

Eligibility of a highway for an agricultural roads improvement program grant. (FE)

Topics: Agriculture, Engineer, Road: Construction and repair, Transportation, Department of: Roads

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 19, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 443. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Transportation administers an agricultural roads improvement program (ARIP) under which DOT provides grants to political subdivisions for projects to improve certain highway facilities that facilitate access to agricultural lands. Among the current eligibility criteria for projects under this program is a requirement that the highway have a demonstrated level of insufficiency for agricultural traffic. Currently, this may be demonstrated either by the highway having been designated as a class “B” highway due to structural deficiencies or having been subject to a posted weight limitation for at least one month during the previous year.

This bill adds an additional option for demonstrating insufficiency. Namely, under the bill, the requirement is satisfied if an engineering analysis performed by a registered professional engineer indicates that the highway is unable to accommodate heavy agricultural traffic.

Who's behind it

22 representatives are its ⁠. 18 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.

20 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 42 names

Authors (22)

Signed on in support (20)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 20, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 8, 2026 to Mar 19, 2026

    7 more representatives signed on in support.

  3. Nov 20, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Nov 20, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  5. Oct 29, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Oct 14, 2025

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  7. Oct 14, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Sep 22, 2025 to Oct 14, 2025

    2 more representatives and 1 senator signed on in support.

  9. Sep 19, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  10. Sep 19, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tranel, Hurd, VanderMeer, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Goodwin, Green, Gundrum, Knodl, Kreibich, Miresse, Murphy, Mursau, Novak, O'Connor, Penterman, Sortwell, Spiros, Stroud, Wichgers and Anderson; cosponsored by Senators Marklein, Feyen, Jacque, Jagler, Nass, Spreitzer, Testin, Tomczyk and Wimberger

  2. Sep 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation

  3. Sep 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Palmeri added as a coauthor

  4. Sep 23, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Kitchens added as a coauthor

  5. Oct 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Senator James added as a cosponsor

  6. Oct 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Oct 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Senator Ratcliff added as a cosponsor

  8. Oct 29, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  9. Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Nov 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Nov 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Jan 8, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a coauthor

  13. Jan 9, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative DeSanto added as a coauthor

  14. Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Tucker added as a coauthor

  15. Feb 20, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Udell added as a coauthor

  16. Mar 6, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Brown added as a coauthor

  17. Mar 16, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Billings added as a coauthor

  18. Mar 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Emerson added as a coauthor

  19. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote