Assembly Bill 453
Required approvals of rezoning requests related to residential development, contents of and consistency of local ordinances with local comprehensive plans, certain tax incremental district project costs related to residential development, and tax incremental district lifespan extension. (FE)
Topics: Administration, Department of: Agency and general functions, County, Farmland preservation, Housing, Land use planning and control, Municipality: Planning, Ordinance, Property tax, Town
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 2, 2026. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Sep 25, 2025
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Oct 7, 2025
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 18, 2026
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2025 Wisconsin Act 173
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 2, 2026: “Published 4-3-2026”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 472. That version died when the session ended.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill provides for mandatory rezoning upon certain requests for rezoning related to residential development, requires certain information in comprehensive plans of political subdivisions, allows for a longer extension of the lifespan of a tax incremental district (TID) for housing stock improvement purposes, and provides a definition of “newly platted residential construction” for the purpose of defining certain costs that may be included as project costs for a TID.
Mandatory rezoning and comprehensive planning This bill requires a political subdivision to grant a request for rezoning when a person submits a request for a change to a zoning classification of land that is required to proceed with a residential housing development and all of the following apply:
Read the full summary Show less
1. The proposed change is for an area identified in the political subdivision’s comprehensive plan as projected for residential land use.
2. The area is contiguous with existing development.
3. The proposed minimum and maximum net density of residences in the residential housing development are within the minimum and maximum net density for the area specified by the political subdivision in its comprehensive plan or the political subdivision has failed to comply with the requirement created in the bill to specify the minimum and maximum net density in the area.
4. Current housing supply in the political subdivision does not meet existing housing demand or forecasted housing demand within the next five years, as provided in the comprehensive plan.
The bill provides that a political subdivision may refuse to grant a request meeting these requirements if the political subdivision demonstrates that the denial is necessary either 1) to prevent a shortage in, or the overburdening of, public facilities located in the political subdivision or 2) to address a significant threat to public health or safety.
The bill provides an exception to this mandatory rezoning procedure upon the failure of certain attempts to develop properties within a political subdivision. Specifically, if a political subdivision requests proposals for certain residential development and no proposals are received, the mandatory rezoning procedure created in the bill does not apply in that political subdivision for one year after the last date on which responses to the request were to be accepted.
The bill also specifies that a person who enforces the requirements of the bill by a mandamus action may recover any court costs and reasonable attorney fees attributable to the failure to approve the request within 60 days.
Comprehensive planning Under current law, unless certain conditions apply, certain ordinances enacted or amended by a political subdivision that affect land use must be consistent with that political subdivision’s comprehensive plan. The ordinances to which this requirement applies are official mapping, local subdivision regulation, and zoning ordinances. Also under current law, if a political subdivision enacts or amends any of these ordinances, the comprehensive plan must contain at least all of the required planning elements. The required planning elements include the following: housing; transportation; utilities and community facilities; agricultural, natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land use; and intergovernmental cooperation.
The bill requires political subdivisions to identify in their comprehensive plans the areas in which residential land use is projected and, for each of these areas, to specify the minimum and maximum net density of residences that will be authorized. These projections and authorized densities must be provided for five-year increments over 20 years. Political subdivisions must ensure that their comprehensive plans satisfy this requirement if, after the effective date of the bill, the political subdivision enacts or amends an official mapping ordinance, local subdivision ordinance, or zoning ordinance or adds lands by annexation or consolidation intended for residential development. In addition, if a person requests rezoning or the approval of a permit related to residential housing development, the political subdivision must amend its comprehensive plan within 180 days to satisfy the residential use and density specification requirement.
If a person requests rezoning for a residential housing development and the political subdivision has not complied with the residential use and density specification requirement, the bill provides that the land is either rezoned to the person’s requested zoning classification or that certain dimensional, physical, and location requirements requested by the person or the least restrictive dimensional, physical, and location requirements in the political subdivision’s zoning ordinance for any residential classification apply.
TIF generally Under current law, cities and villages may use tax incremental financing (TIF) to encourage development in the city or village. In general, under TIF, a city or village pays for improvements in a TID and then collects tax moneys attributable to all taxing jurisdictions on the increased property value in the TID for a certain period of time to pay for the improvements. Ideally, after that period of time, the city or village will have been repaid for its initial investment and the property tax base in the TID will have permanently increased in value.
In general and in brief, a city or village makes use of TIF using the following procedure:
1. The city or village designates an area as a TID and creates a project plan laying out the expenditures that the city or village will make within the TID, and the designation and project plan are approved by representatives of the other taxing jurisdictions (joint review board).
2. The Department of Revenue establishes the “base value” of the TID. This value is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation.
3. Each year thereafter, the “value increment” of the property within the TID is determined by subtracting the base value from the current value of property within the TID. The portion of taxes collected on any positive value increment (the tax increment) is collected by the city or village for use solely for the project costs of the TID. Tax increments collected by the city or village include taxes that would have been collected by other taxing jurisdictions, such as counties or school districts, if the TID had not been created.
4. Tax increments are collected until the city or village has recovered all of its project costs or until the TID reaches its statutory termination date.
Extending the life of a TID for housing stock purposes Currently, a city or village may extend the life of a TID for up to one year for housing stock improvement if all of the following occur:
1. The city or village pays off all of the TID’s project costs.
2. The city or village adopts a resolution stating that it intends to extend the life of the TID, the number of months it intends to do so, and how it intends to improve housing stock.
3. The city or village notifies DOR.
Current law requires the city or village to use 75 percent of the tax increments received during the period specified in the resolution to benefit affordable housing in the city or village and 25 percent to otherwise improve the city’s or village’s housing stock.
Under the bill, a TID’s life may be extended for up to two years for housing stock improvement. Also, under the bill, all tax increments for housing stock improvement must be expended to purchase goods or services from for-profit entities.
Expenditures for residential development Under current law, the project costs of a TID must be enumerated in the TID’s project plan. These project costs are the expenditures that the city or village expects to make in carrying out the project plan. Current law limits the types of expenditures that may be included as project costs. For example, public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; and site preparation costs may be included. The costs of constructing administrative buildings, for example, may not.
Generally, under current law, project costs may, under certain circumstances, include expenditures for newly platted residential development. Currently, such expenditures may qualify as project costs only in TIDs for which a project plan was approved before September 30, 1995, or for mixed-use TIDs. With regard to a mixed-use TID, such expenditures qualify only if certain density or development quality standards are also satisfied.
The bill defines “newly platted residential development” as residential development on a parcel that has not previously been the site of permanent structures other than structures used solely for agricultural purposes.
Because this bill may increase or decrease, directly or indirectly, the cost of the development, construction, financing, purchasing, sale, ownership, or availability of housing in this state, the Department of Administration, as required by law, will prepare a report to be printed as an appendix to this bill.
Who's behind it
10 representatives are its . All 10 are Republicans.
3 more lawmakers .
See all 13 names Hide the names
Authors (10)
- Dave Armstrong · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Kreibich · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Will Penterman · Republican, Assembly
- Jim Piwowarczyk · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Summerfield · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (3)
- Jodi Emerson · Democrat, Assembly
- John Jagler · Republican, Senate
- Melissa Ratcliff · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 11 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote on an amendment
Passed, 13 to 1 · Oct 3, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote on an amendment
Passed, 14 to 0 · Oct 3, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 14, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote on an amendment
Passed, 14 to 0 · Oct 3, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 14, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 5 · Oct 3, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 54 to 41 · Oct 7, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 54, Noes 41”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 55 to 39 · Oct 7, 2025 · 5 didn't vote
See how each of the 99 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (55)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alex Dallman (R, 39)
- Amanda Nedweski (R, 32)
- Barbara Dittrich (R, 99)
- Ben Franklin (R, 88)
- Bob Donovan (R, 61)
- Bob Wittke (R, 63)
- Brent Jacobson (R, 87)
- Calvin Callahan (R, 35)
- Chanz Green (R, 74)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Clint Moses (R, 92)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dave Armstrong (R, 67)
- Dave Maxey (R, 83)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Duke Tucker (R, 75)
- Elijah Behnke (R, 6)
- Gus Gustafson (R, 55)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jerry O'Connor (R, 60)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jim Piwowarczyk (R, 98)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Joy Goeben (R, 5)
- Karen Hurd (R, 69)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lindee Brill (R, 27)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Melotik (R, 22)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Randy Udell (D, 47)
- Rick Gundrum (R, 58)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Kreibich (R, 28)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Shae Sortwell (R, 2)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Tony Kurtz (R, 41)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Will Penterman (R, 38)
No (39)
- Alex Joers (D, 81)
- Andrew Hysell (D, 48)
- Angela Stroud (D, 73)
- Angelina Cruz (D, 62)
- Ann Roe (D, 44)
- Ben DeSmidt (D, 65)
- Brienne Brown (D, 43)
- Christian Phelps (D, 93)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Darrin Madison (D, 10)
- Deb Andraca (D, 23)
- Francesca Hong (D, 76)
- Jenna Jacobson (D, 50)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Joan Fitzgerald (D, 46)
- Jodi Emerson (D, 91)
- Joe Sheehan (D, 26)
- Kalan Haywood (D, 16)
- Karen DeSanto (D, 40)
- Karen Kirsch (D, 7)
- Lee Snodgrass (D, 52)
- Lori Palmeri (D, 54)
- Margaret Arney (D, 18)
- Maureen McCarville (D, 42)
- Mike Bare (D, 80)
- Priscilla Prado (D, 9)
- Renuka Mayadev (D, 77)
- Russell Goodwin (D, 12)
- Ryan Clancy (D, 19)
- Ryan Spaude (D, 89)
- Sequanna Taylor (D, 11)
- Shelia Stubbs (D, 78)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Supreme Moore Omokunde (D, 17)
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D, 8)
- Tara Johnson (D, 96)
- Tip McGuire (D, 64)
- Vinnie Miresse (D, 71)
Didn't vote (5)
- Amaad Rivera-Wagner (D, 90)
- Angelito Tenorio (D, 14)
- Clint Anderson (D, 45)
- Greta Neubauer (D, 66)
- Robyn Vining (D, 13)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Insurance vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Insurance vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Insurance vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 11, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 18 to 15 · Feb 18, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 28 to 5 · Feb 18, 2026
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (28)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Brad Pfaff (D, 32)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Cory Tomczyk (R, 29)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Eric Wimberger (R, 2)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jamie Wall (D, 30)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Jesse James (R, 23)
- Jodi Habush Sinykin (D, 8)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- Julian Bradley (R, 28)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- Kristin Dassler-Alfheim (D, 18)
- Mark Spreitzer (D, 15)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Melissa Ratcliff (D, 16)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara (R, 19)
- Rob Hutton (R, 5)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Romaine Quinn (R, 25)
- Sarah Keyeski (D, 14)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (5)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dora Drake (D, 4)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 2, 2026
The new law was published.
-
Apr 2, 2026
The governor signed it. It became 2025 Wisconsin Act 173.
-
Apr 1, 2026
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 19, 2026
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Feb 19, 2026
“Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)
-
Feb 18, 2026
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 18, 2026
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Feb 18, 2026
The Senate passed it too, 28 to 5.
-
Feb 18, 2026
The Senate adopted it.
-
Nov 11, 2025
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Nov 11, 2025
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Nov 11, 2025
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 20, 2025
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 15, 2025
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 8, 2025
Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry.
-
Oct 7, 2025
The Senate received it.
-
Oct 7, 2025
The Assembly passed it, 55 to 39.
-
Oct 7, 2025
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Oct 3, 2025
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 5.
-
Sep 30, 2025
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Sep 25, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Housing and Real Estate.
-
Sep 25, 2025
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Sep 25, 2025 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Armstrong, Brooks, Dittrich, Knodl, Kreibich, Murphy, O'Connor, Piwowarczyk, Summerfield and Penterman; cosponsored by Senator Jagler
- Sep 25, 2025 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate
- Sep 26, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Brooks
- Sep 26, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Brooks
- Sep 30, 2025 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 1, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Armstrong
- Oct 1, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Representative Armstrong
- Oct 2, 2025 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 3, 2025 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 13, Noes 1
- Oct 3, 2025 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Oct 3, 2025 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Oct 3, 2025 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Housing and Real Estate, Ayes 9, Noes 5
- Oct 3, 2025 · Assembly
Referred to calendar of 10-7-2025
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Joers
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 54, Noes 41
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 4 adopted
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 5 offered by Representative Armstrong
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 5 adopted
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 55, Noes 39
- Oct 7, 2025 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 7, 2025 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Oct 8, 2025 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry
- Oct 15, 2025 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 20, 2025 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 3, 2025 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Jagler
- Nov 3, 2025 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Jagler
- Nov 11, 2025 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Nov 11, 2025 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Nov 11, 2025 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Nov 11, 2025 · Senate
Report concurrence as amended recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Nov 11, 2025 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 17, 2026 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-18-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Ratcliff, L. Johnson, Wall, Spreitzer, Drake, Dassler-Alfheim, Habush Sinykin, Hesselbein, Keyeski, Pfaff, Roys and Smith
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 28, Noes 5
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Senator Ratcliff added as a cosponsor
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly
Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 and Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted)
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 concurred in
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 concurred in
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2026 · Assembly
LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)
- Feb 23, 2026 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 2-23-2026
- Mar 19, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Emerson added as a coauthor
- Apr 1, 2026 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-1-2026
- Apr 2, 2026 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2026. 2025 Wisconsin Act 173
- Apr 2, 2026 · Assembly
Published 4-3-2026
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote