Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 458

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: admissibility of expert witness testimony.

Court — Procedure Witness

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill updates the current statutory rule of evidence relating to testimony by experts to conform with recent changes made to Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 702 intended to clarify the court’s gatekeeping role with respect to expert testimony. Current law parallels FRE 702 prior to its amendment, allowing the testimony of an expert witness if the witness’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact at issue in the case, but limiting the testimony of an expert witness to testimony that is based on sufficient facts or data, that is the product of reliable principles and methods, and that is based on the witness applying those principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case. Similar to the changes made to FRE 702, the bill confirms that the proponent of the testimony is required to demonstrate to the court that it is more likely than not that the witness’s testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, that it is the product of reliable principles and methods, and, finally, that the witness’s opinion reflects a reliable application of those principles and methods to the facts of the case.

Sponsors

Introduced by: B. Jacobson (R) , Duchow (R) , Kreibich (R) , Moses (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , O'Connor (R) , Penterman (R) , Piwowarczyk (R) , Tittl (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Wittke (R)

4 cosponsors

Feyen (R) , Marklein (R) , Wanggaard (R) , Wimberger (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 7

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Jan 14, 2026 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Sep 26, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives B. Jacobson, Kreibich, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, O'Connor, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Tittl, VanderMeer, Wittke and Duchow; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Feyen, Marklein and Wimberger

  2. Sep 26, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Nov 5, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 8, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  6. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Jan 20, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-22-2026 by Committee on Rules

  8. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  9. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1