Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 460

Pupil eligibility for parental choice programs based upon participation by a sibling or a dependent child of the pupil's parent or guardian. (FE)

Topics: Family, School: Attendance

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 3, 2026. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 26, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 19, 2026

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 17, 2026

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 3, 2026.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 452. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under this bill, a pupil is eligible to participate in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program, Racine Parental Choice Program, or Wisconsin Parental Choice Program (parental choice program) if the pupil’s sibling or a dependent child of the pupil’s parent or guardian participated in a parental choice program in the previous school year. Under current law, pupils must meet certain family income requirements and grade level or prior year attendance requirements to be eligible to participate in a parental choice program. Specifically, under current law, to participate in the MPCP or RPCP, a pupil’s family income cannot exceed 300 percent of the federal poverty limit, and to participate in the WPCP, a pupil’s family income cannot exceed 220 percent of the federal poverty limit. In addition, to be eligible for the RPCP or WPCP under current law, a pupil must be entering kindergarten, first grade, or ninth grade or, in the previous school year, must have been enrolled in a public school, not been enrolled in school, attended school in another state, participated in a parental choice program, or been on a waiting list to participate in a parental choice program. Under the bill, the family income and grade level or prior year attendance requirements do not apply to a pupil whose sibling or whose parent’s or guardian’s dependent child participated in a parental choice program.

Who's behind it

16 representatives are its ⁠. All 16 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 20 names

Authors (16)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Education vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 4 · Nov 12, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Education vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 6, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 18 to 15 · Mar 17, 2026

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “SHALL THE DECISION OF THE CHAIR STAND”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 3, 2026

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 2, 2026

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 17, 2026

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 17, 2026

    “Point of order that Senate Substitute Amendment 1 was not germane well taken” (the official wording)

  6. Mar 6, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  7. Mar 3, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Feb 25, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.

  9. Feb 23, 2026

    The Senate received it.

  10. Feb 19, 2026

    The Assembly passed it.

  11. Nov 12, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Nov 12, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 4.

  13. Nov 6, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Oct 21, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Sep 26, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Education.

  16. Sep 26, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 26, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Duchow, Brill, Dittrich, Donovan, Goeben, B. Jacobson, Maxey, Melotik, Murphy, Mursau, O'Connor, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Steffen, Tusler and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Jagler, Nass, Quinn and Kapenga

  2. Sep 26, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Education

  3. Oct 21, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Nov 6, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Nov 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 4

  7. Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:23 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14

  9. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Feb 23, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Feb 25, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  16. Mar 3, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  17. Mar 6, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  18. Mar 6, 2026 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  19. Mar 6, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  20. Mar 16, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  21. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senators Pfaff, Carpenter, Dassler-Alfheim, Drake, Habush Sinykin, Hesselbein, L. Johnson, Keyeski, Ratcliff, Roys, Smith, Spreitzer, Wall and Wirch

  22. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Point of order that Senate Substitute Amendment 1 was not germane well taken

  24. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Decision of the Chair stands as the judgment of the Senate, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  25. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  27. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  28. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Mar 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  30. Mar 24, 2026 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-24-2026

  31. Apr 2, 2026 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026

  32. Apr 3, 2026 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-3-2026

  33. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  34. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote