Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 486

Permissible financial aid reductions in higher education. (FE)

Topics: Colleges and universities, Scholarships and loans, Technical college, University of Wisconsin

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Feb 12, 2026, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 9, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 12, 2026

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 868. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill prohibits an institution of higher education from reducing gift aid that the institution has offered to a student because the student has received a private scholarship from a Wisconsin-based entity, unless certain circumstances apply. The bill applies to University of Wisconsin System institutions, Wisconsin technical colleges, and private, nonprofit institutions that are members of the Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities. “Gift aid” is defined in the bill to mean all financial aid that is not a loan or work-study program, including grants, scholarships, tuition waivers, and third-party payments. “Private scholarship” is defined to mean a scholarship of $5,000 or less awarded by a Wisconsin-based entity but does not include an award funded by an entity that is affiliated with the institution of higher education.

Under the bill, an institution of higher education may reduce the amount of gift aid it offers to a student athlete as a result of a private scholarship award if the reduction must be done in order to comply with the individual or team financial aid restrictions of a governing national intercollegiate athletic association. The institution of higher education may also reduce the amount of a student’s offered gift aid as a result of a private scholarship award if the student’s total gift aid from all sources exceeds the student’s financial need and if the institution first alerts the student that the student may request a reassessment of a certain metric of how the institution of higher education calculates the student’s financial need. Before reducing the amount of a student’s offered gift aid, an institution of higher education must first attempt to reduce or replace other kinds of gift aid that the student has been offered, subject to applicability and to the extent that such action is permitted by the federal Department of Education.

Read the full summary

The bill also requires an institution of higher education to make a sincere attempt to ask the provider of a private scholarship to rescind and re-award to a student a private scholarship in a way that does not constrain how the institution applies it to the student’s cost of attendance or to ask for a private scholarship award provider to clarify the way in which a private scholarship may be used. A private scholarship provider is not required to comply with the institution’s requests.

Who's behind it

5 representatives are its ⁠. All 5 are Republicans.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 4 · Jan 14, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 4 · Jan 14, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 53 to 45 · Feb 12, 2026 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (53)

No (45)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Failed, 2 to 3 · Mar 9, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence by Committee on Universities and Technical Colleges, Ayes 2, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 9, 2026

    “Report concurrence by Committee on Universities and Technical Colleges, Ayes 2, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  3. Mar 4, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  4. Feb 16, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Universities and Technical Colleges.

  5. Feb 13, 2026

    The Senate received it.

  6. Feb 12, 2026

    The Assembly passed it, 53 to 45.

  7. Feb 12, 2026

    The Assembly adopted it.

  8. Jan 14, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Jan 14, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 4.

  10. Dec 17, 2025

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  11. Dec 10, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Oct 16, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Oct 14, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Oct 9, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities.

  15. Oct 9, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Sortwell, Behnke, Maxey, Mursau and O'Connor

  2. Oct 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Colleges and Universities

  3. Oct 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Dec 10, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Dec 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Senator Jacque added as a cosponsor

  7. Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Sortwell

  8. Jan 8, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 4

  10. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 4

  11. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-12-2026 by Committee on Rules

  13. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  15. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 45

  18. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Feb 13, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Feb 16, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Universities and Technical Colleges

  21. Mar 4, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  22. Mar 9, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  23. Mar 9, 2026 · Senate

    Report concurrence by Committee on Universities and Technical Colleges, Ayes 2, Noes 3

  24. Mar 9, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  25. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote