Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 493

Authorizing community solar programs and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Topics: Electric utility, Energy conservation, Ordinance, Public Service Commission

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 9, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 559. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill authorizes the establishment of community solar programs through which retail electric customers of an investor-owned electric utility may subscribe to a community solar facility and receive credits to their electric bills for electricity produced by the facility. Under the bill, entities called subscriber organizations may own or operate community solar facilities, which use solar energy to produce electricity. Retail electric customers may enter into a contract (subscription) with a subscriber organization through which the customers receive credits towards their electric bill based on their subscriptions. A subscriber and the community solar facility to which the subscriber subscribes must be located within the service territory of the same investor-owned electric utility. In addition, a subscriber may not receive an annual value of bill credits that exceeds the subscriber’s average annual electric bill. Also, under the bill, subscribers may not receive any state subsidy for which generating electricity from a renewable energy resource is a criteria for eligibility nor may subscribers receive any payment or other benefit from a tax incremental district.

The bill requires an investor-owned electric utility whose service territory includes subscribers to a community solar facility to credit the electric bills of the subscribers based on their subscriptions. PSC must promulgate rules allowing for establishment of community solar facilities and for subscribers to receive electric bill credits for their subscriptions. Under the bill, PSC’s community solar program rules must also satisfy various other requirements, including that the rules must modify existing interconnection standards, fees, and processes to facilitate interconnection of community solar facilities with the electric distribution grid. The rules must also require subscriber organizations to maintain proof of financial responsibility ensuring the availability of funds for decommissioning community solar facilities. PSC’s rules must also provide that bill credits may not reduce a subscriber’s monthly electric bill, including fixed charges, below $20. Four years after the rules take effect, PSC must submit a report to the legislature evaluating the costs and benefits of community solar programs.

Read the full summary

The bill limits the total nominal capacity of community solar facilities established in this state to 1,750 megawatts. PSC must apportion the total nominal capacity limit among the investor-owned electric utilities having a service territory within this state, and the apportionment must be based on each utility’s proportion of the total electric load served in this state. A community solar facility may not be established within the service territory of an investor-owned electric utility if the nominal capacity of the facility plus the total nominal capacity of the community solar facilities already established within the service territory of the utility exceeds the capacity limit apportioned to the utility by the PSC. The bill also provides that PSC must promulgate rules that prohibit community solar facilities placed in service after December 31, 2035, from entering the program.

The bill also specifies that community solar facilities are subject to the zoning ordinances applicable to the parcels on which they are located. Also under the bill, with some exceptions, no building permit for a structure that is part of a community solar facility may be issued unless the municipality with zoning authority over the parcels on which the community solar facility is to be located approves the use of those parcels for purposes of a community solar facility by a two-thirds vote of the governing body of the municipality. The bill also subjects the community solar facilities of subscriber organizations to property taxation. Generally under current law, a person engaged in generating electricity for others is exempt from property taxation but is instead subject to a tax based on gross revenues.

Who's behind it

11 representatives are its ⁠. All 11 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Agriculture vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 6 · Mar 12, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 9, Noes 6”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Agriculture vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 6 · Mar 12, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 9, Noes 6”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 12, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 12, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 6.

  4. Jan 21, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Jan 12, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Agriculture.

  6. Nov 14, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  7. Oct 28, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Oct 22, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Oct 9, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities.

  10. Oct 9, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Krug, Gustafson, Dittrich, Gundrum, Maxey, Melotik, Murphy, Mursau, Spiros, Tittl and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Testin, Quinn and Wimberger

  2. Oct 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Energy and Utilities

  3. Oct 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 28, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Nov 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Knodl added as a coauthor

  6. Jan 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Energy and Utilities and referred to committee on Agriculture pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  7. Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Krug, Tranel, Moses, Behnke, Kitchens, Murphy, Mursau, Pronschinske and VanderMeer

  9. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Mar 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 9, Noes 6

  11. Mar 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Ayes 9, Noes 6

  12. Mar 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote