Assembly Bill 544
A statewide retail food establishment food grading system, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Topics: Administrative rules, Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Food, Public health, Public safety, Retail establishment
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 15, 2025
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection. The committee's chair at the time was Calvin Callahan. Chairs decide which bills get a hearing. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection is responsible for the administration and enforcement of this state’s food safety laws, including those relating to licensing and inspections of restaurants and other retail food establishments. DATCP is permitted to contract with local health departments to aide in investigating and enforcing the state’s food safety laws. An authorized DATCP inspector may at any time during reasonable hours enter and inspect licensed retail food establishments, and may issue a holding order prohibiting the sale or movement of food if the inspector has reasonable cause to believe the food is adulterated or misbranded and dangerous to health or misleading as to injury or damage that could occur to a consumer. Upon finding a violation of the food safety laws, DATCP may also issue a special order directing compliance with food safety law, and may also by summary order suspend a license or permit issued if it finds there has been a substantial failure to comply with the food safety laws and that the violation constitutes a serious danger to public health.
This bill requires DATCP to establish within its current food safety regulatory activities a statewide food safety grading system for retail food establishments. The food safety grading system shall be based on a 100-point scale and shall categorize and assign negative point values that correspond to food safety violations that may occur at retail food establishments and that are based on the risk each food safety violation poses to public health. DATCP or a local health department designated as an agent of the department must at least once annually conduct unannounced inspections of each licensed retail food establishment, identify any food safety violations, and, using the point system developed by DATCP, determine for the retail food establishment a food safety score of A, B, C, or Grade Pending. If a retail food establishment receives a grade of Grade Pending, it must comply with DATCP’s or the local health department’s instructions for immediate corrective action, and the retail food establishment shall be subject to reinspection according to a timeline chosen by DATCP or the local health department. A retail food establishment may within 30 days of receiving a grade request a reinspection. A retail food establishment must comply with certain requirements regarding the posting of the grade it receives as a result of the inspection conducted under the system, including the requirement to display the grade it receives on all its public entrances. Failure to comply with the posting requirements may result in the retail food establishment being subject to a warning for the first violation, a forfeiture of $500 for a second violation committed within 12 months of a previous violation, and a $1,000 forfeiture for a third or subsequent violation committed within 12 months of any two previous violations. The bill requires DATCP to create and maintain an online database that is open to the public and that details the results of inspections conducted and grades determined for retail food establishments. The bill also requires DATCP to promulgate rules to enforce the food safety grading system.
Who's behind it
4 representatives are its . 3 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.
See all 4 names Hide the names
Authors (4)
- Margaret Arney · Democrat, Assembly
- Russell Goodwin · Democrat, Assembly
- Clint Moses · Republican, Assembly
- Shelia Stubbs · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2026
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Feb 3, 2026
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 15, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.
-
Oct 15, 2025
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 15, 2025 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Goodwin, Moses, Arney and Stubbs
- Oct 15, 2025 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection
- Feb 3, 2026 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate