Assembly Bill 582
Dual enrollment programs, creating the Council on Dual Enrollment, and transfer of postsecondary course credits. (FE)
Topics: Colleges and universities, School: Curriculum, Technical College System Board, University of Wisconsin: Courses, University of Wisconsin: Regents, Workforce Development, Department of
Vetoed by the governor
Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 3, 2026. Lawmakers did not , so it stands.
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 24, 2025
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 55 to 43
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 17, 2026
-
Governor, stopped here
Vetoed Apr 3, 2026.
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 591. That version died when the session ended.
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill creates the Council on Dual Enrollment (council) in the Department of Workforce Development. The council consists of two members appointed by the president of the University of Wisconsin System; two members appointed by the director of the Wisconsin Technical College System; two members appointed by the state superintendent of public instruction; two members appointed by the president of the Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (WAICU); one member appointed by the executive director of the Wisconsin Association of School Boards; one member appointed by the board of directors of the Wisconsin Council of Religious and Independent Schools; one member who represents tribal colleges in this state; one member who is a school district administrator appointed by the Joint Committee on Legislative Organization; one member appointed by the speaker of the assembly; and one member appointed by the senate majority leader. The bill defines a “dual enrollment program” as any program or course of study designed to provide high school pupils with the opportunity to gain credits in both high school and a UW System institution, technical college, private nonprofit college, or tribal college in Wisconsin (institution of higher education). The council must study and recommend methods of ensuring that all Wisconsin pupils and their families have access to clear, affordable, and attainable pathways to college credit during high school. The council must also endeavor to maximize the acceptance by institutions of higher education of course credit earned in high school. The council must advise DWD with respect to all of the council’s findings and recommendations. The council must meet at least annually to review and make recommendations regarding the state’s dual enrollment programs. DWD must provide administrative support and assistance to the council.
The bill requires DWD to establish and maintain a portal on DWD’s website dedicated to informing high school pupils and their families about the state’s dual enrollment programs. As part of the information available on the portal, DWD must include 1) sufficient information for pupils and their families to apply to any dual enrollment program offered in Wisconsin and 2) information regarding courses that may be taken under dual enrollment programs offered in Wisconsin. DWD must update this information at least annually. DWD must also post on the portal the council’s findings and recommendations from each annual review. In addition, DWD must create a printed brochure that includes, at a minimum, the information specified in items 1) and 2) above, and this brochure must be available to high school pupils and their families and to school staff.
Read the full summary Show less
Current law provides various options for high school pupils to receive postsecondary credit through dual enrollment programs. These options include contractual partnerships between institutions of higher education and high school governing bodies as well as programs known as the Early College Credit Program (ECCP) and the Start College Now Program (SCNP).
Currently under ECCP, a pupil attending a public high school, including a charter school, or a private high school may enroll in a UW System institution, private nonprofit college, or tribal college to take one or more courses, including during a summer session. The pupil must submit an application to the applicable postsecondary institution and indicate on the application whether the pupil will be taking each course for high school credit or postsecondary credit or both. A pupil who intends to enroll in a postsecondary institution under ECCP must notify the governing body of the pupil’s high school by March 1 if the pupil intends to enroll in the fall semester and by October 1 if the pupil intends to enroll in the spring semester. The notice must include certain information, such as each course title and whether the pupil will take the course for high school or postsecondary credit. If the course is to be taken for high school credit, the governing body of the pupil’s high school must determine whether the course is comparable to a course offered and whether the course satisfies high school graduation requirements. A postsecondary institution must admit a pupil to attend a course under ECCP if the pupil meets the requirements and prerequisites of the course and there is space available in the course. If a postsecondary institution admits a pupil to ECCP, it must notify the governing body of the pupil’s high school. Responsibility for payment of tuition and fees for a course taken under ECCP depends on various factors, but the cost may be borne by the governing body of the pupil’s high school, DWD, or the pupil or a combination of these. However, the pupil generally pays nothing if the course is taken for high school credit and postsecondary credit and there is no comparable high school course available to the pupil.
Currently under SCNP, a public school pupil may apply to attend a technical college to take one or more courses if the pupil satisfies certain criteria, including that the pupil 1) has completed the 10th grade; 2) is in good academic standing; and 3) notifies the applicable school board of the pupil’s intent to attend a technical college under SCNP by March 1 if the pupil intends to enroll in the fall semester and by October 1 if the pupil intends to enroll in the spring semester. Subject to exceptions, the technical college must admit the pupil if the pupil meets the requirements and prerequisites of the course and there is space available in the course. The pupil is eligible to receive both high school and technical college credit for courses successfully completed at the technical college. If the course is not comparable to courses offered in the pupil’s school district, the school district must pay the pupil’s tuition and fees for the course.
The bill makes the following changes to ECCP and SCNP:
1. It allows summer session courses to be taken under SCNP.
2. It changes the applicable deadline for a pupil to give notice of intent to take a course under either program from March 1 to May 1 for the fall semester and from October 1 to November 1 for the spring semester. It also establishes a notice deadline of April 1 for a summer session.
3. It allows 9th and 10th grade pupils to take courses under SCNP.
Current law requires each school board to annually provide information about ECCP to all pupils enrolled in the school district in the 8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th grades. The bill requires this information to also be provided to pupils in the 7th grade. The bill also requires the school board to provide, from the DWD portal, sufficient information for parents and students to apply to any dual enrollment program offered in Wisconsin.
Current law requires the Board of Regents to establish policies for the transfer of course credits between UW System institutions, including postsecondary credits earned by a high school pupil under ECCP. By September 1, 2026, all credits for core general education courses must be transferable between UW System institutions and satisfy general education requirements at the receiving institution. The Board of Regents may also establish policies for the transfer of course credits with other educational institutions, including postsecondary credits earned under ECCP. In addition, the Board of Regents and the WTCS Board must enter into an agreement that identifies at least 72 credits of core general education courses that are transferable and satisfy general education requirements at the receiving UW institution or technical college. The Board of Regents and the WTCS Board must ensure that tribal colleges and WAICU, on behalf of private nonprofit colleges, have an opportunity to participate in the agreement.
The bill requires the Board of Regents and WAICU, on behalf of private nonprofit colleges, to enter into an agreement that identifies at least 36 credits of core general education courses that are transferable and satisfy general education requirements at the receiving UW institution or at the receiving private college that chooses to participate in the agreement. A private college may exclude from application of the agreement any course that does not align with an institutional religious or professional pathway requirement.
The bill also specifies that, if core general education course credits are transferable under current law, postsecondary credits earned by a high school pupil under ECCP or SCNP for completion of a core general education course are likewise transferable.
Who's behind it
11 representatives are its . All 11 are Republicans.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 13 names Hide the names
Authors (11)
- Elijah Behnke · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Melotik · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Will Penterman · Republican, Assembly
- Jessie Rodriguez · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Republican, Senate
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Education vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 3 · Nov 12, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 9, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 55 to 43 · Nov 19, 2025 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 99 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (55)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alex Dallman (R, 39)
- Amanda Nedweski (R, 32)
- Barbara Dittrich (R, 99)
- Ben Franklin (R, 88)
- Bob Donovan (R, 61)
- Bob Wittke (R, 63)
- Brent Jacobson (R, 87)
- Calvin Callahan (R, 35)
- Chanz Green (R, 74)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Clint Moses (R, 92)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dave Armstrong (R, 67)
- Dave Maxey (R, 83)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Duke Tucker (R, 75)
- Elijah Behnke (R, 6)
- Gus Gustafson (R, 55)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jerry O'Connor (R, 60)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jim Piwowarczyk (R, 98)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Joy Goeben (R, 5)
- Karen Hurd (R, 69)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lee Snodgrass (D, 52)
- Lindee Brill (R, 27)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Melotik (R, 22)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Rick Gundrum (R, 58)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Kreibich (R, 28)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Shae Sortwell (R, 2)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Tony Kurtz (R, 41)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Will Penterman (R, 38)
No (43)
- Alex Joers (D, 81)
- Amaad Rivera-Wagner (D, 90)
- Andrew Hysell (D, 48)
- Angela Stroud (D, 73)
- Angelina Cruz (D, 62)
- Angelito Tenorio (D, 14)
- Ann Roe (D, 44)
- Ben DeSmidt (D, 65)
- Brienne Brown (D, 43)
- Christian Phelps (D, 93)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Clint Anderson (D, 45)
- Darrin Madison (D, 10)
- Deb Andraca (D, 23)
- Francesca Hong (D, 76)
- Greta Neubauer (D, 66)
- Jenna Jacobson (D, 50)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Joan Fitzgerald (D, 46)
- Jodi Emerson (D, 91)
- Joe Sheehan (D, 26)
- Kalan Haywood (D, 16)
- Karen DeSanto (D, 40)
- Karen Kirsch (D, 7)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Lori Palmeri (D, 54)
- Margaret Arney (D, 18)
- Maureen McCarville (D, 42)
- Mike Bare (D, 80)
- Priscilla Prado (D, 9)
- Randy Udell (D, 47)
- Renuka Mayadev (D, 77)
- Robyn Vining (D, 13)
- Russell Goodwin (D, 12)
- Ryan Clancy (D, 19)
- Ryan Spaude (D, 89)
- Shelia Stubbs (D, 78)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Supreme Moore Omokunde (D, 17)
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D, 8)
- Tara Johnson (D, 96)
- Tip McGuire (D, 64)
- Vinnie Miresse (D, 71)
Didn't vote (1)
- Sequanna Taylor (D, 11)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Universities and Technical Colleges vote to recommend it
Passed, 3 to 2 · Jan 12, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Universities and Technical Colleges, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 13, 2026
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
Apr 3, 2026
The governor vetoed it.
-
Apr 2, 2026
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 17, 2026
The Senate passed it too.
-
Jan 12, 2026
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.
-
Jan 7, 2026
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Dec 2, 2025
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 20, 2025
Sent to the Senate Committee on Universities and Technical Colleges.
-
Nov 20, 2025
The Senate received it.
-
Nov 19, 2025
The Assembly passed it, 55 to 43.
-
Nov 18, 2025
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 12, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Nov 12, 2025
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 3.
-
Nov 11, 2025
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 30, 2025
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 24, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Education.
-
Oct 24, 2025
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 24, 2025 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Murphy, Kitchens, Behnke, Dittrich, Knodl, Melotik, Mursau, O'Connor, Penterman, Rodriguez and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Cabral-Guevara and Jacque
- Oct 24, 2025 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Education
- Oct 30, 2025 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Nov 6, 2025 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 11, 2025 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 11, 2025 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 9, Noes 3
- Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Nov 13, 2025 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-19-2025 by Committee on Rules
- Nov 18, 2025 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 55, Noes 43
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 20, 2025 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 20, 2025 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Universities and Technical Colleges
- Dec 2, 2025 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 7, 2026 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 12, 2026 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 12, 2026 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Universities and Technical Colleges, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Jan 12, 2026 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 16, 2026 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 17, 2026 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 17, 2026 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 17, 2026 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Mar 17, 2026 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 17, 2026 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 18, 2026 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Mar 26, 2026 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2026
- Apr 2, 2026 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026
- Apr 3, 2026 · Assembly
Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-3-2026
- May 12, 2026 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 13, 2026 · Assembly
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote