Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 595

Compliance with the federal Help America Vote Act, voter registration data sharing agreements, removing ineligible voters from the official voter registration list, and fees for obtaining the official voter registration list. (FE)

Topics: Citizenship, Corrections, Department of, Elections, Elections Commission, Elections: Registration, Legislative Audit Bureau, Transportation, Department of: Administration, Vital statistics, Voting

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 8, 2026. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 24, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 19, 2025

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 18 to 15

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 8, 2026.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 595. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Help America Vote Act Current law allows any person who believes that a violation of the federal Help America Vote Act is occurring or is proposed to occur with respect to an election for national office in this state to file a written verified complaint with the Elections Commission. The person filing the complaint may request a hearing. If a hearing is requested, the commission must make a final determination regarding the merits of the complaint and issue a decision no later than 89 days after receiving the complaint.

The commission has taken a position that it cannot decide a complaint brought against itself. In 2022, the Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed with that position. See, Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission , 2022 WI 64, ¶ 33, 403 Wis. 2d 607, 976 N.W.2d 519. The commission recently received a letter from the federal Department of Justice asserting that such a position violates the administrative complaint requirements under the Help America Vote Act.

Read the full summary

Under this bill, if the commission receives a complaint that alleges that the commission itself is violating HAVA and the complaint raises a substantial question of material fact, the commission must make a final determination on the merits of the complaint and issue a decision. The bill prohibits the commission from dismissing the complaint simply because the complaint alleges a commission violation.

The bill specifies that a complainant may request a hearing if the complaint raises a substantial question of material fact and that the request must be a written request. In addition, if the complaint raises such an issue, the commission may decide to hold a hearing regardless of whether a hearing has been requested. The bill provides that a hearing before the commission to adjudicate an alleged HAVA violation must be held in open session and that the oral proceedings of the hearing must be recorded by stenographic or electronic means, consistent with current law regarding administrative hearings. In addition, the commission must make a transcript of the oral proceedings available for public inspection and in preparation for judicial review. Under current law, all records that are distributed or discussed in the course of a meeting or hearing by the commission in open session are available for public inspection.

The bill also requires that the final determination of a complaint alleging a HAVA violation be in writing. If the commission dismisses a complaint or does not grant the relief requested in the complaint, the person filing the complaint may seek judicial review of the commission’s decision, consistent with current law regarding judicial review of administrative decisions. As required by HAVA, the commission must publish the results of all dismissed complaints on its website.

Data sharing agreements Current law requires the administrator of the Elections Commission to enter into an agreement with the secretary of transportation to match personally identifiable information on the official registration list maintained by the commission with personally identifiable information maintained by the Department of Transportation in vehicle registration and license records. The bill requires the administrator and the secretary to update the agreement at least once every two years. Under the bill, the commission is given access to information maintained by DOT in order to verify that individuals on the official registration list are U.S. citizens. The bill requires DOT to conduct matching of personally identifiable information maintained by DOT with that on the registration list on a daily basis. Under the bill, if the information on the official registration list for an individual does not match the information for the individual maintained by DOT, DOT must provide to the commission the name and date of birth of the individual and the number of the driver’s license or identification card issued by DOT to the individual. The bill also requires DOT to indicate to the commission whether the individual reported a change of address for purposes of updating records regarding a driver’s license, identification card, or vehicle registration.

Under current law, the municipal clerk must change the registration of deceased electors from eligible to ineligible status by means of checking vital statistics reports. Current law requires the Department of Health Services to establish the Office of Vital Records and to appoint a state registrar to supervise the office. Generally, OVR and the state registrar are responsible for accepting, indexing, and preserving vital records, such as original marriage documents and records of birth, death, and divorce. The bill requires the administrator of the commission and the state registrar to enter into an agreement to match personally identifiable information from the registration list with the death records maintained by OVR. The administrator and the state registrar must update the agreement at least once every two years. Under the bill, OVR must conduct matching of personally identifiable information on a daily basis and immediately notify the administrator of the commission of the name, date of birth, date of death, and place of death of any person on the official registration list for which OVR has a death record.

Under current law, the Department of Corrections must transmit to the commission, on a continuous basis, a list containing the name of each living person who has been convicted of a felony and whose civil rights have not been restored, together with the person’s residential address and the date on which DOC expects the person’s civil rights to be restored. The bill requires DOC to transmit this information to the commission on a daily basis. In addition, the bill requires the secretary of corrections and the administrator of the commission to enter into an agreement to match personally identifiable information from the registration list with the personally identifiable information maintained by DOC and update that agreement at least once every two years.

Removing ineligible voter from the registration list Under current law, if a voter who appears on the official voter registration list maintained by the Elections Commission becomes ineligible to vote for any reason, his or her status is changed from eligible to ineligible on the registration list.

Under this bill, if a voter who appears on the registration list becomes ineligible to vote for any reason, he or she must be removed from the list and the Elections Commission must keep a permanent record of the removal, including the date of and reason for the removal. Consistent with current law, an individual who is removed from the registration list and subsequently becomes eligible to register to vote in Wisconsin may reregister as provided by law.

Voter citizenship audit This bill requires the Legislative Audit Bureau to conduct an audit of the official voter registration list in the year of the bill’s enactment and in every odd-numbered year to identify registered individuals who are not U.S. citizens. The bill requires LAB to compare the information contained in the registration list with the information the Elections Commission receives from the Department of Transportation, the Department of Corrections, and the Office of Vital Records, established by the Department of Health Services. If LAB identifies registrants who are not U.S. citizens, LAB must verify the citizenship of those registrants by using the systematic alien verification for entitlements database maintained by the federal Department of Homeland Security. LAB must then notify the Elections Commission and the appropriate municipal clerks or boards of election commissioners of the individuals listed on the official registration list that LAB has identified as not being U.S. citizens.

Under the bill, the Elections Commission must send notice to each registrant identified as a noncitizen to inform the registrant that the registrant will be removed from the official registration list if he or she does not provide proof of citizenship to the commission or to the appropriate municipal clerk or board of election commissioners no later than 30 days after receiving the notice.

The bill requires the Legislative Audit Bureau to submit a report of its findings and recommendations to the legislature no later than June 30 of the odd-numbered year. The report must include the number of individuals incorrectly identified as not being U.S. citizens on the official registration list and the number of individuals correctly identified as not being U.S. citizens on the list and removed from the list.

Fees for obtaining the registration list Under current law, the Elections Commission establishes a fee, by rule, for obtaining a copy of the official voter registration list. The fee is an amount estimated to cover both the cost of reproduction and the cost of maintaining the list at the state and local level.

Under the bill, a person may obtain a copy of the official voter registration list for Wisconsin, or any portion of the list, electronically by paying a fee of $1,000 or less as established by the commission. The bill authorizes the commission to charge an additional fee for providing a copy of the list in physical form in order to cover the cost of reproduction and postage, if any.

Who's behind it

17 representatives are its ⁠. All 17 are Republicans.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (17)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 2 · Nov 12, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 11, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 18 to 15 · Mar 17, 2026

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 8, 2026

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 2, 2026

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 17, 2026

    The Senate passed it too, 18 to 15.

  5. Mar 11, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  6. Mar 3, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Nov 24, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Nov 20, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development.

  9. Nov 20, 2025

    The Senate received it.

  10. Nov 19, 2025

    The Assembly passed it.

  11. Nov 12, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Nov 12, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  13. Nov 11, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Nov 10, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Nov 4, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Oct 24, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections.

  17. Oct 24, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 24, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Krug, Knodl, O'Connor, Steffen, Penterman, Armstrong, Kitchens, Allen, Hurd, Murphy, Tittl, Maxey, Snyder, Nedweski, Green, Spiros and Melotik; cosponsored by Senators Tomczyk and Quinn

  2. Oct 24, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Campaigns and Elections

  3. Nov 4, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Nov 10, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Nov 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  8. Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Nov 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-19-2025 by Committee on Rules

  10. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Nov 20, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Nov 20, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development

  17. Nov 24, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  18. Mar 3, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  19. Mar 11, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  20. Mar 11, 2026 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  21. Mar 11, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Mar 16, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  23. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Read a second time

  24. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  26. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  27. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Mar 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  29. Mar 27, 2026 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  30. Mar 27, 2026 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-27-2026

  31. Apr 2, 2026 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026

  32. Apr 8, 2026 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-8-2026

  33. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  34. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote