Assembly Bill 617
Applying for and returning absentee ballots; use of central counting locations; election night reporting; court determinations of incompetency and ineligibility to vote; preelection tests of electronic voting equipment, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Topics: Circuit court, Elections, Elections Commission, Elections: Ballots, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Municipality: Officers, Voting, Voting machine
Passed the Assembly, then stopped
The Assembly passed it on Nov 19, 2025, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to . The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 4, 2025
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Nov 19, 2025
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 624. That version died when the session ended.
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Location of alternate absentee ballot sites Current law authorizes municipalities to establish one or more alternate absentee ballot sites to which voters may return absentee ballots for an election and and at which they may apply for and vote an in-person absentee ballot. An alternate site must be located as near as practicable to the office of the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners and may not be designated in such a way as to afford an advantage to any political party.
Under the bill, an alternate absentee ballot site must be in a building or facility constituting a fixed location.
Read the full summary Show less
Absentee ballot certificate defects Under current law, a municipal clerk may return to the voter an absentee ballot with an improperly completed certificate or with no certificate whenever time permits the voter to correct the defect and return the absentee ballot to the polling place before 8 p.m. on election day. Under the bill, the municipal clerk must return such an absentee ballot to the voter under those circumstances.
Absentee ballot request and return confirmation Current law allows a voter to receive an absentee ballot by making a written application by means of facsimile transmission or electronic mail. Under the bill, if a voter makes a written application by electronic mail and submits his or her mobile telephone number with the application, after the voter completes and submits the application, the electronic application system maintained by the Elections Commission must automatically notify the voter by text message that his or her application has been received. In addition, under the bill, after the voter completes and returns his or her ballot, the system must automatically notify the voter by text message that his or her ballot has been received. The bill provides that all mobile telephone numbers submitted for the purposes provided under the bill are confidential.
Under the bill, information concerning such text message notifications must be included in the type E notice, which the municipal clerk must publish in advance of each election. The type E notice provides information to voters concerning voting by absentee ballot. The bill also requires that the type E notice be published on the municipality’s website if it has one.
Absentee ballot application deadline Under current law, if a voter applies for an absentee ballot by mail, the application must be received by the municipal clerk no later than 5 p.m. on the fifth day immediately preceding the election. This bill changes that deadline to the seventh day immediately preceding the election.
Election night reporting Under the bill, at 10 p.m. on election night, and every hour thereafter until the canvass is complete, each municipal clerk or his or her designee must provide to the county clerk of the county in which the municipality is located a statement that shows the total number of ballots, including absentee ballots, cast at the municipality in the election, the total number of ballots, including absentee ballots, that have been canvassed, and the total number of ballots, including absentee ballots, that remain to be canvassed. The county clerk must promptly post each statement on the website on which the county clerk posts returns on election night. In a municipality having a municipal board of election commissioners (currently, only the city of Milwaukee), the municipal board of election commissioners must also post the statement on the website maintained by the municipal board of election commissioners. The statement may not include the names or addresses of any electors.
Court determinations of incompetency and ineligibility to vote Under current law, no person who is incapable of understanding the objective of the elective process or who is under a guardianship may vote unless a court has determined that the person is competent to vote. Current law also allows any voter in a municipality to petition a circuit court to determine whether a person residing in the municipality is incapable of understanding the objective of the elective process. If the court determines that the person is incapable of such understanding, the person is not eligible to register to vote or to vote. Current law requires the clerk of the circuit court to communicate the court’s determinations, in writing, to the election officials who are responsible for determining challenges to registration and voting that may be brought against the person.
The bill requires the circuit court to notify the Elections Commission, by email, of the court’s determination regarding incompetency and ineligibility to register to vote or to vote. Under the bill, when the commission receives a determination of incompetency and ineligibility to register to vote or to vote, the commission must, within three business days, change the status of the voter subject to the determination to inactive on the official voter registration list, note on the list that the voter is ineligible to register to vote or to vote, and notify the voter and the voter’s municipal clerk of the voter’s change in status. The bill also provides that if a court reviews a determination of incompetency and ineligibility to vote and restores the voter’s right to vote, upon receipt of that determination by email, the commission must, within three business days, notify the voter that the voter is eligible to vote and that the voter is required to complete a new registration to vote if the voter intends to vote. Under the bill, the clerk must examine the registration list before issuing a ballot to any voter.
Use of central counting locations Under current law, votes are canvassed at the polling place on election day, except that any municipality where an electronic voting system is used may elect to adjourn the canvass to a central counting location where all votes cast in the municipality may be counted on election day. The bill eliminates the option for municipalities to use such central counting locations.
Preelection tests of electronic voting equipment Current law requires the municipal clerk of each municipality that employs an electronic voting system that uses automatic tabulating equipment at a polling place or a central count location to conduct a public test of the equipment not more than 10 days before an election. Under the bill, the municipal clerk is required to conduct that test not more than 15 days before the election.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report.
Who's behind it
4 representatives are its . All 4 are Republicans.
1 more lawmaker .
See all 5 names Hide the names
Authors (4)
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Snyder · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (1)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections vote on an amendment
Passed, 4 to 2 · Nov 12, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 2 · Nov 12, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 53 to 44 · Nov 19, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 53, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 53 to 44 · Nov 19, 2025 · 2 didn't vote
See how each of the 99 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (53)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alex Dallman (R, 39)
- Amanda Nedweski (R, 32)
- Barbara Dittrich (R, 99)
- Ben Franklin (R, 88)
- Bob Donovan (R, 61)
- Bob Wittke (R, 63)
- Brent Jacobson (R, 87)
- Calvin Callahan (R, 35)
- Chanz Green (R, 74)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Clint Moses (R, 92)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dave Armstrong (R, 67)
- Dave Maxey (R, 83)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Duke Tucker (R, 75)
- Elijah Behnke (R, 6)
- Gus Gustafson (R, 55)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jerry O'Connor (R, 60)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jim Piwowarczyk (R, 98)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Joy Goeben (R, 5)
- Karen Hurd (R, 69)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lindee Brill (R, 27)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Melotik (R, 22)
- Rick Gundrum (R, 58)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Kreibich (R, 28)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Shae Sortwell (R, 2)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Tony Kurtz (R, 41)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Will Penterman (R, 38)
No (44)
- Alex Joers (D, 81)
- Amaad Rivera-Wagner (D, 90)
- Andrew Hysell (D, 48)
- Angela Stroud (D, 73)
- Angelina Cruz (D, 62)
- Angelito Tenorio (D, 14)
- Ann Roe (D, 44)
- Ben DeSmidt (D, 65)
- Brienne Brown (D, 43)
- Christian Phelps (D, 93)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Clint Anderson (D, 45)
- Darrin Madison (D, 10)
- Deb Andraca (D, 23)
- Francesca Hong (D, 76)
- Greta Neubauer (D, 66)
- Jenna Jacobson (D, 50)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Joan Fitzgerald (D, 46)
- Jodi Emerson (D, 91)
- Joe Sheehan (D, 26)
- Karen DeSanto (D, 40)
- Karen Kirsch (D, 7)
- Lee Snodgrass (D, 52)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Lori Palmeri (D, 54)
- Margaret Arney (D, 18)
- Maureen McCarville (D, 42)
- Mike Bare (D, 80)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Priscilla Prado (D, 9)
- Randy Udell (D, 47)
- Renuka Mayadev (D, 77)
- Robyn Vining (D, 13)
- Russell Goodwin (D, 12)
- Ryan Clancy (D, 19)
- Ryan Spaude (D, 89)
- Shelia Stubbs (D, 78)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Supreme Moore Omokunde (D, 17)
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D, 8)
- Tara Johnson (D, 96)
- Tip McGuire (D, 64)
- Vinnie Miresse (D, 71)
Didn't vote (2)
- Kalan Haywood (D, 16)
- Sequanna Taylor (D, 11)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2026
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Feb 10, 2026
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 20, 2025
Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development.
-
Nov 20, 2025
The Senate received it.
-
Nov 19, 2025
The Assembly passed it, 53 to 44.
-
Nov 19, 2025
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Nov 18, 2025
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 12, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Nov 12, 2025
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.
-
Nov 6, 2025
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 4, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections.
-
Nov 4, 2025
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 4, 2025 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Krug, Snyder, O'Connor and Knodl; cosponsored by Senator Cabral-Guevara
- Nov 4, 2025 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Campaigns and Elections
- Nov 5, 2025 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Nov 6, 2025 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Nov 6, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Snodgrass and Anderson
- Nov 11, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Krug
- Nov 11, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Snodgrass and Anderson
- Nov 11, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representatives Snodgrass and Anderson
- Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly Substitute Amendment 2)
- Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 2
- Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Campaigns and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 2
- Nov 12, 2025 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Nov 13, 2025 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-19-2025 by Committee on Rules
- Nov 18, 2025 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 offered by Representative Snodgrass
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 53, Noes 44
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adopted
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 20, 2025 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 20, 2025 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development
- Feb 10, 2026 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2026 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote