Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 663

Imposing certain prohibitions on foreign influence at University of Wisconsin System institutions. (FE)

Topics: International relations, Legislature: Finance, Joint Committee on, University of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin: Regents

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Mar 27, 2026. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 19, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 22, 2026

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 19 to 14

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Mar 27, 2026.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 653. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill prohibits, with an exception, University of Wisconsin System institutions from participating in a collaboration agreement, academic partnership, or research partnership with a college or university based in China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, or Qatar or with the government or regime of any of these countries (foreign adversary) or certain persons or entities associated with these countries (foreign principals). A “collaboration agreement” is a written statement of mutual interest in academic or research collaboration. An “academic partnership” is a faculty or student exchange program, study abroad program, articulation program, recruiting program, or dual degree program. A “research partnership” is an agreement, memorandum of understanding, joint project, consortium, or other collaborative arrangement for the purpose of jointly conducting, funding, or facilitating scientific, technological, engineering, medical, social science, or other scholarly research.

This bill also prohibits, without exception, UW System institutions from accepting any grant from a college or university based in any of these countries or from a foreign adversary or foreign principal.

Read the full summary

The bill provides an exception allowing a UW System institution, upon approval by the Board of Regents of the UW System, to enter into a collaboration agreement, academic partnership, or research partnership with a college or university based in any of these countries or with a foreign adversary or foreign principal if 1) the Board of Regents determines that the collaboration agreement, academic partnership, or research partnership is valuable to students and to the UW System institution and is not detrimental to the safety or security of the United States or its residents, and 2) the Board of Regents first requests and receives a national security risk assessment of the proposed collaboration agreement, academic partnership, or research partnership by a federal law enforcement agency. Also, the Board of Regents may not approve such an agreement or partnership if the agreement or partnership would constrain the institution’s freedom of contract or allow the institution’s curriculum or values to be directed or controlled by a foreign adversary or foreign principal. However, in the 2025-27 fiscal biennium, the exception does not apply to, and a UW System institution may not enter into such an agreement or partnership with, Russia. In addition, a UW System institution or researcher may not approve, continue, or enter into a collaboration agreement, academic partnership, or research partnership with a college or university based in any of these countries or with a foreign adversary or foreign principal if any project under the agreement or partnership is funded in full or in part by the U.S. Department of Defense.

The bill also requires the Board of Regents to adopt a policy prohibiting each institution from procuring or using educational software from a prohibited business entity. A “prohibited business entity" is defined to include a company domiciled, incorporated, or headquartered in, or having its principal place of business in, a country controlled by a foreign adversary, as well as a Chinese-controlled company.

The bill also prohibits UW System institutions, and their employees and representatives, from soliciting or accepting gifts in an official capacity, including favors and promises of future employment, from a college or university based in any of these countries or from a foreign adversary or foreign principal. UW System institutions also may not accept anything of value conditioned upon participation in a program to promote the language or culture of any of these countries.

The bill requires the Board of Regents to submit an annual report to the governor and the legislature relating to collaboration agreements, academic partnerships, and research partnerships of UW System institutions, including detailed information on each request by the Board of Regents for a national security risk assessment.

Under the bill, if a UW System institution violates any provision of the bill, the Joint Committee on Finance may determine the monetary value to the UW System institution of a violating collaboration agreement, academic partnership, or research partnership or otherwise resulting from the violation. An amount that is twice the monetary value determined by JCF is published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register and, upon publication, the secretary of administration must transfer the published amount from the UW System’s general program operations appropriation to the JCF supplemental appropriation.

Who's behind it

15 representatives are its ⁠. All 15 are Republicans.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 20 names

Authors (15)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 7 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 2 · Jan 14, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 8, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 4 · Jan 14, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 53 to 44 · Jan 22, 2026 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (53)

No (44)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Licensing vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 4, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 17, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 18 to 15 · Feb 18, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 19 to 14 · Feb 18, 2026

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Mar 27, 2026

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Mar 26, 2026

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 18, 2026

    The Senate passed it too, 19 to 14.

  5. Feb 17, 2026

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 4, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  7. Jan 26, 2026

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  8. Jan 26, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs.

  9. Jan 22, 2026

    The Senate received it.

  10. Jan 22, 2026

    The Assembly passed it, 53 to 44.

  11. Jan 22, 2026

    The Assembly adopted it.

  12. Jan 14, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Jan 14, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 4.

  14. Dec 10, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Dec 3, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Nov 19, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities.

  17. Nov 19, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Dallman, Behnke, Brill, Callahan, Dittrich, Goeben, Green, Knodl, Kurtz, Melotik, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, O'Connor and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Tomczyk, Jacque, Nass and Testin

  2. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Colleges and Universities

  3. Dec 3, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 3, 2025 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Dallman

  5. Dec 10, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Jan 8, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 8, Noes 2

  8. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 4

  9. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Jan 20, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-22-2026 by Committee on Rules

  11. Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Dallman

  12. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  15. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44

  18. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Jan 22, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Jan 26, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs

  21. Jan 26, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Piwowarczyk added as a coauthor

  22. Feb 4, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  23. Feb 4, 2026 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  24. Feb 4, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  25. Feb 17, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  26. Feb 17, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-18-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  27. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Smith

  28. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Read a second time

  29. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  30. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  32. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  33. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  35. Feb 20, 2026 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-20-2026

  36. Mar 26, 2026 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2026

  37. Mar 27, 2026 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-27-2026

  38. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  39. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote