Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 669

Race-based higher education programs and requirements. (FE)

Topics: Colleges and universities, Higher Educational Aids Board, Medical education, Minority groups, Teacher, Technical College System Board, University of Wisconsin

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 19, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 652. That version was vetoed.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill changes certain race-based programs or requirements in higher education. In general, the bill modifies these programs and requirements so they apply to disadvantaged students rather than minority students. Under the bill, the term “disadvantaged,” with respect to a student, means having experienced any unfavorable economic, familial, geographic, physical, or other personal hardship. The term may be further defined by rule but may not include the consideration of 1) a student’s race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or religion or 2) a student’s identity as a member of a group without regard to individual qualities.

Higher Educational Aids Board Minority teacher loan program Under current law, the Higher Educational Aids Board administers a minority teacher loan program for minority students who meet certain criteria, including being enrolled in a teaching program in a discipline with teacher shortages. A “minority student” is defined as a student who is a Black American; an American Indian or Alaskan native; a Hispanic; a person of Asian or Pacific Island origin; or a person whose ancestry includes two or more races. Under the program, HEAB may award to an eligible student a loan of up to $10,000 per year for not more than three years. The loan is generally repayable, but HEAB must forgive 25 percent of the loan for each school year the loan recipient 1) is employed as a full-time teacher in a high-demand area related to the recipient’s discipline; 2) is employed by a public or private school located in a school district in which minority students constitute at least 40 percent of pupil enrollment; and 3) receives an educator effectiveness rating of proficient or distinguished.

Read the full summary

The bill changes the program so that it is available to disadvantaged students rather than minority students. The bill also changes the criteria for loan forgiveness described in 2, above, so the recipient must be employed by a public or private school located in a school district in which “economically disadvantaged pupils,” defined as pupils eligible for a free or reduced-price lunch, constitute at least 60 percent of pupil enrollment.

Minority undergraduate grants Under current law, HEAB administers a minority undergraduate retention grant program for minority undergraduates enrolled in private, nonprofit colleges and technical colleges. A “minority undergraduate” is defined as an undergraduate student who is a Black American; an American Indian; a Hispanic; or a person admitted to the United States after December 31, 1975, who is either a former citizen of Laos, Vietnam, or Cambodia or whose ancestor was or is a citizen of Laos, Vietnam, or Cambodia (Hmong). HEAB must evenly distribute program funds to private, nonprofit colleges and technical colleges, and these receiving colleges must award grants to eligible students on the basis of financial need.

The bill changes the program so that it is available to disadvantaged undergraduate students rather than minority undergraduate students.

Minority student enrollment at Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University School of Dentistry Current law provides state funding to the Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc., for certain purposes, but one condition for receiving this funding is that MCW make every effort to ensure that at least 5 percent of its total enrollment consists of minority students.

The bill repeals this requirement.

Current law requires HEAB to facilitate a contract between the state and a private, nonprofit dental school for dental education services. The contract must incorporate certain requirements, including that the dental school make every effort to ensure that at least 5 percent of its total enrollment consists of minority students.

The bill repeals this requirement.

University of Wisconsin System Minority and disadvantaged student programs Current law requires the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System to fund programs for minority and disadvantaged students enrolled in the UW System and programs to recruit minority and disadvantaged students. The Board of Regents must also adopt a recruitment and retention plan for minority and disadvantaged students.

Current law requires the Board of Regents to establish a grant program for minority and disadvantaged graduate students enrolled in the UW System.

The bill modifies these provisions to delete references to the minority status of students, so they apply only to disadvantaged students.

Lawton grants Current law requires the Board of Regents to establish a grant program for minority undergraduates enrolled in the UW System. The grants are known as Lawton grants. A “minority undergraduate” is defined as an undergraduate student who is a Black American; an American Indian; a Hispanic; or Hmong.

The bill changes the Lawton grant program so that Lawton grants are awarded to disadvantaged undergraduate students rather than minority undergraduate students.

Technical colleges Minority student participation and retention plan Current law requires the Technical College System Board to develop a plan to increase minority group member participation and retention in the Technical College System. The plan must include certain information, including a review of the progress made by the TCS Board and technical colleges in the previous school year. A “minority group member” is defined as a Black, a Hispanic, an American Indian, an Eskimo, an Aleut, a native Hawaiian, an Asian-Indian, or a person of Asian-Pacific origin.

The bill modifies this requirement so that it applies with respect to disadvantaged students rather than minority group members.

Minority student participation and retention grants Under current law, the TCS Board, upon application by a technical college, may award a grant to the technical college to accomplish specified purposes relating to minority students, including the following: providing counseling and tutoring services for minority students; pursuing innovative approaches to increasing minority student placement and retention in programs that lead to a high earning potential; providing internships to minority students preparing for transfer to UW System teacher education programs; and recruiting, training, and retaining minority students through the use of community-based organizations. A “minority student” is defined as a student enrolled in a technical college who is a minority group member, as defined above.

The bill changes this grant program so that grants are awarded for programs related to disadvantaged students rather than minority students.

Incentive grants Under current law, the TCS Board awards incentive grants to technical colleges for specified purposes. One such purpose is the creation or expansion of adult high school, adult basic education, and English as a second language courses. The TCS Board must give priority to courses serving students with disabilities or minority, unemployed, or disadvantaged students.

The bill eliminates the priority for courses serving minority students but does not affect the priority for courses serving students with disabilities or unemployed or disadvantaged students.

Who's behind it

16 representatives are its ⁠. All 16 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 20 names

Authors (16)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 5 · Feb 10, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 10, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Feb 10, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 5.

  4. Jan 8, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Dec 3, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Dec 2, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Dec 1, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Nov 19, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities.

  9. Nov 19, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Piwowarczyk, Behnke, Callahan, Dittrich, Goeben, Green, B. Jacobson, Knodl, Melotik, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, O'Connor, Penterman, Tucker and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Wimberger, Nass, Quinn and Tomczyk

  2. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Colleges and Universities

  3. Dec 1, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 2, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Dec 3, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Dec 3, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jan 8, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 5

  10. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-12-2026 by Committee on Rules

  12. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Piwowarczyk and Allen

  13. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  14. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote