Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 675

Noncompete clauses for medical practitioners

Topics: Employment, Nurses, Physician, Physician assistant, Psychology

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 19, 2025

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Health, Aging and Long-Term Care.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 657. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes changes regarding covenants not to compete for advanced practice registered nurses, advanced practice nurse prescribers, physicians, physician assistants, and psychologists (“medical practitioners”).

Under current law, a covenant by an assistant, servant, or agent not to compete with his or her employer or principal during the term of the employment or agency, or after the termination of the employment or agency, within a specified territory and during a specified time is lawful and enforceable only if the restrictions imposed are reasonably necessary for the protection of the employer or principal. A covenant not to compete that imposes an unreasonable restraint, however, is illegal, void, and unenforceable even as to any part of the covenant that would be a reasonable restraint.

Read the full summary

The bill provides that a covenant by a medical practitioner not to compete with his or her employer after the termination of the employment imposes an unreasonable restraint and is illegal, void, and unenforceable if the covenant includes a restriction that prohibits working as a medical practitioner for more than 24 consecutive months after the first day of the medical practitioner’s employment with the employer that is imposing the covenant not to compete. The bill also provides that a covenant not to compete by a medical practitioner is illegal, void, and unenforceable if the medical practitioner’s employment is terminated for any reason by the medical practitioner’s employer.

Who's behind it

10 representatives are its ⁠. 9 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (7)

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 28, 2026 to Feb 20, 2026

    3 more representatives signed on in support.

  3. Jan 7, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  4. Nov 21, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Nov 19, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health, Aging and Long-Term Care.

  6. Nov 19, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Neylon, O'Connor, Dittrich, Green, Gustafson, Knodl, Murphy, Wichgers, Steffen and Palmeri; cosponsored by Senators Cabral-Guevara, Nass and Roys

  2. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health, Aging and Long-Term Care

  3. Nov 21, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Subeck added as a coauthor

  4. Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 28, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Stubbs added as a coauthor

  6. Jan 29, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a coauthor

  7. Feb 20, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Sheehan added as a coauthor

  8. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor