Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 692

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: additional local sales and use taxes and making an appropriation. (FE)

Municipality — Taxation Ordinance Sales tax Shared revenue

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law allows a county to enact an ordinance to impose sales and use taxes at the rate of 0.5 percent of the sales price or purchase price on tangible personal property and taxable services. The county must use the revenue from the taxes for property tax relief. Under the bill, a county may imposes that county sales and use tax at the rate of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 percent. The bill also allows a county to impose, by ordinance, an additional sales and use tax at the rate of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 percent of the sales price or purchase price on tangible personal property and taxable services. The revenue from those taxes may be used for any purpose designated by the county board or specified in the ordinance.

The bill also allows a municipality to enact an ordinance to impose sales and use taxes at the rate of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 percent of the sales price or purchase price on tangible personal property and taxable services. The revenue from those taxes may be used for any purpose designated by the governing body of the municipality or specified in the ordinance.

The bill also excludes revenues generated from a municipal sales and use tax from being considered in determining eligibility for an expenditure restraint incentive program payment. Under current law, a municipality is eligible to receive an expenditure restraint incentive program payment if its property tax levy is greater than 5 mills and if the annual increase in its municipal budget, subject to certain exceptions, is less than the sum of factors based on inflation and the increased value of property in the municipality as a result of new construction.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Arney (D) , Billings (D) , Fitzgerald (D) , Joers (D) , McCarville (D) , Palmeri (D) , Prado (D) , Rivera-Wagner (D) , Roe (D) , Sinicki (D) , Stroud (D) , Stubbs (D) , Subeck (D) , Taylor (D) , Tenorio (D) , Udell (D) , Vining (D)

9 cosponsors

Dassler-Alfheim (D) , Habush Sinykin (D) , Keyeski (D) , L. Johnson (D) , Larson (D) , Ratcliff (D) , Roys (D) , Smith (D) , Spreitzer (D)

Registered lobbying interests · 2

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Full history

  1. Nov 26, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Anderson, Rivera-Wagner, Roe, Arney, Billings, Fitzgerald, Joers, McCarville, Palmeri, Sinicki, Stroud, Stubbs, Taylor, Udell, Vining, Prado, Subeck and Tenorio; cosponsored by Senators Spreitzer, Smith, Dassler-Alfheim, Habush Sinykin, L. Johnson, Keyeski, Larson, Ratcliff and Roys

  2. Nov 26, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means

  3. Jan 5, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1