Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 701

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: adopting the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act.

Court — Procedure Uniform legislation

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill adopts the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA) approved by the Uniform Law Commission in 2020.

The bill allows a person served with a complaint in a civil action to file an expedited special motion to dismiss any cause of action asserted against the person based on the person’s 1) communication in a governmental proceeding; 2) communication on an issue under consideration or review in a governmental proceeding; or 3) exercise of the constitutional right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, on a matter of public concern. In general, the court must hold a hearing on a special motion to dismiss within 60 days of its filing and must stay the court proceedings, including discovery, until the court rules on the special motion and the time to appeal this ruling has expired. The court must rule on the special motion not later than 60 days after the hearing, and the appeal period is 14 days from the ruling. In ruling on the motion, the court must consider the pleadings, the motion, any reply or response to the motion, and any evidence that could be considered in a summary judgment proceeding. The court must dismiss with prejudice a cause of action if all of the following apply:

1. The moving party establishes that the cause of action is as described in items 1 to 3 above.

2. The responding party fails to establish the applicability of certain excluded situations, such as the cause of action being brought against a governmental unit or employee acting in an official capacity or against a person whose communication relates to the sale of goods or services.

3. The responding party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each element of the cause of action or the moving party establishes either that the responding party failed to state a cause of action or that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A moving party has a right to appeal an order denying a special motion to dismiss. A court must award court costs, reasonable attorney fees, and reasonable litigation expenses related to the special motion as follows: 1) to the moving party if the moving party prevails on the motion, or 2) to the responding party if the responding party prevails on the motion and the motion was frivolous or filed solely with intent to delay the proceeding.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Behnke (R) , Brill (R) , Dittrich (R) , Goeben (R) , Gundrum (R) , Kitchens (R) , Knodl (R) , Kreibich (R) , Maxey (R) , Melotik (R) , O'Connor (R) , Piwowarczyk (R)

4 cosponsors

Murphy (R) , Ortiz-Velez (D) , Udell (D) , Wimberger (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 7

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Jan 15, 2026 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 1, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Piwowarczyk, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Goeben, Gundrum, Kitchens, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Melotik and O'Connor; cosponsored by Senator Wimberger

  2. Dec 1, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a coauthor

  5. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  7. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Murphy added as a coauthor

  9. Feb 2, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Udell added as a coauthor

  10. Feb 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from Committee on Rules and referred to calendar of 2-17-2026

  11. Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  17. Feb 20, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  18. Feb 20, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1