Assembly Bill 701
Adopting the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act
Topics: Court: Procedure, Uniform legislation
Passed the Assembly, then stopped
The Assembly passed it on Feb 17, 2026, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to . The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Dec 1, 2025
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 17, 2026
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 666. That version died when the session ended.
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill adopts the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA) approved by the Uniform Law Commission in 2020.
The bill allows a person served with a complaint in a civil action to file an expedited special motion to dismiss any cause of action asserted against the person based on the person’s 1) communication in a governmental proceeding; 2) communication on an issue under consideration or review in a governmental proceeding; or 3) exercise of the constitutional right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, on a matter of public concern. In general, the court must hold a hearing on a special motion to dismiss within 60 days of its filing and must stay the court proceedings, including discovery, until the court rules on the special motion and the time to appeal this ruling has expired. The court must rule on the special motion not later than 60 days after the hearing, and the appeal period is 14 days from the ruling. In ruling on the motion, the court must consider the pleadings, the motion, any reply or response to the motion, and any evidence that could be considered in a summary judgment proceeding. The court must dismiss with prejudice a cause of action if all of the following apply:
Read the full summary Show less
1. The moving party establishes that the cause of action is as described in items 1 to 3 above.
2. The responding party fails to establish the applicability of certain excluded situations, such as the cause of action being brought against a governmental unit or employee acting in an official capacity or against a person whose communication relates to the sale of goods or services.
3. The responding party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each element of the cause of action or the moving party establishes either that the responding party failed to state a cause of action or that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
A moving party has a right to appeal an order denying a special motion to dismiss. A court must award court costs, reasonable attorney fees, and reasonable litigation expenses related to the special motion as follows: 1) to the moving party if the moving party prevails on the motion, or 2) to the responding party if the responding party prevails on the motion and the motion was frivolous or filed solely with intent to delay the proceeding.
Who's behind it
12 representatives are its . All 12 are Republicans.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 16 names Hide the names
Authors (12)
- Elijah Behnke · Republican, Assembly
- Lindee Brill · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- Joy Goeben · Republican, Assembly
- Rick Gundrum · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Kreibich · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Maxey · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Melotik · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Jim Piwowarczyk · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (4)
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez · Democrat, Assembly
- Randy Udell · Democrat, Assembly
- Eric Wimberger · Republican, Senate
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 0 · Jan 15, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2026
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Feb 20, 2026
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Feb 18, 2026
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 17, 2026
The Assembly passed it.
-
Jan 21, 2026 to Feb 2, 2026
2 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Jan 15, 2026
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 15, 2026
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.
-
Jan 14, 2026
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jan 7, 2026
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Dec 1, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.
-
Dec 1, 2025
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Dec 1, 2025 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Piwowarczyk, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Goeben, Gundrum, Kitchens, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Melotik and O'Connor; cosponsored by Senator Wimberger
- Dec 1, 2025 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a coauthor
- Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Murphy added as a coauthor
- Feb 2, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Udell added as a coauthor
- Feb 13, 2026 · Assembly
Withdrawn from Committee on Rules and referred to calendar of 2-17-2026
- Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 18, 2026 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 20, 2026 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Feb 20, 2026 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2026 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote