Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 706

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: equalized value calculations, project costs, and local levy limits relating to tax incremental districts. (FE)

Administration department of — Agency and general functions Administration department of — Boards and other subdivisions County — Taxation Housing Housing and economic development authority wisconsin Municipality — Taxation Property tax

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes various changes to the statutes governing tax incremental financing (TIF), including increasing the percentage of a municipality’s equalized value that may be contained within a tax incremental district (TID) and specifying that costs of construction residential building may be included as project costs within a TID. The bill also repeals certain changes made in the 2023-24 legislative session relating to local levy limits and TIDs.

TIF generally

Under current law, cities and villages may use TIF to encourage development in the city or village. In general, under TIF, a city or village pays for improvements in a TID and then collects tax moneys attributable to all taxing jurisdictions on the increased property value in the TID for a certain period of time to pay for the improvements. Ideally, after that period of time, the city or village will have been repaid for its initial investment and the property tax base in the TID will have permanently increased in value.

In general and in brief, a city or village makes use of TIF using the following procedure:

1. The city or village designates an area as a TID and creates a project plan laying out the expenditures that the city or village will make within the TID.

2. The Department of Revenue establishes the “base value” of the TID. This value is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation.

3. Each year thereafter, the “value increment” of the property within the TID is determined by subtracting the base value from the current value of property within the TID. The portion of taxes collected on any positive value increment (the tax increment) is collected by the city or village for use solely for the project costs of the TID. Tax increments collected by the city or village include taxes that would have been collected by other taxing jurisdictions, such as counties or school districts, if the TID had not been created.

4. Tax increments are collected until the city or village has recovered all of its project costs or until the TID reaches its statutory termination date.

TID valuation limit (the “12 percent rule”)

Under current law, when creating a new TID or amending a TID, a city or village must make a finding that the equalized value of taxable property of the new or amended TID, plus the value increment of all existing TIDs in the city or village, does not exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village. The bill increases that limit to 18 percent.

Local levy limits relating to TIDs

The bill repeals the changes made in

2023 Wisconsin Act 12

to the calculation of local property tax levy limits with regard to taxable property located within a TID.

Generally, under current law, local levy limits are applied to the property tax levies that are imposed by a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision). A political subdivision may not increase its levy by a percentage that exceeds its “valuation factor,” which is the greater of either 1) 0 percent or 2) the percentage change in the political subdivision’s equalized value due to new construction, minus the value of any improvements that were removed (net new construction).

2023 Wisconsin Act 12

changed the calculation for determining the value of net new construction so that it includes only 90 percent of new construction that occurs within TIDs created after December 31, 2024. The bill repeals this change.

Prior to

2023 Wisconsin Act 12

, the statutes provided for an increase in a political subdivision’s levy limit upon the termination of a TID. If DOR did not certify a value increment for a TID for a year because the TID had terminated, the levy limit of the political subdivision in which the TID was located increased by an amount based on 50 percent of the previous year’s value increment for the TID.

Current law now provides that, upon termination or amendment of a TID created after December 31, 2024, the political subdivision’s levy limit is increased by an amount based on 10 percent of the TID’s lifetime equalized value increase. This levy limit increase may be further increased by an amount based on 15 percent of the TID’s lifetime equalized value increase if the TID terminates earlier than was anticipated at the time of the TID’s creation. The bill eliminates these changes that were made by

2023 Wisconsin Act 12

for TIDs created after December 31, 2024.

Project costs and expenditures for residential development

Under current law, the project costs of a TID must be enumerated in the TID’s project plan. These project costs are the expenditures that the city or village expects to make in carrying out the project plan. Current law limits the types of expenditures that may be included as project costs. For example, public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; and site preparation costs may be included. The costs of constructing administrative buildings, for example, may not.

Generally, under current law, project costs may, under certain circumstances, include expenditures for newly platted residential development. Currently, such expenditures may qualify as project costs only in TIDs for which a project plan was approved before September 30, 1995, or for mixed-use TIDs. With regard to a mixed-use TID, such expenditures qualify only if certain density or development quality standards are also satisfied.

The bill eliminates the restrictions on including expenditures for newly platted residential development as project costs and specifically provides that costs of constructing residential buildings may be included as project costs. The bill also adds the costs of developing, improving, or expanding parks as expressly authorized project costs.

Because this bill may increase or decrease, directly or indirectly, the cost of the development, construction, financing, purchasing, sale, ownership, or availability of housing in this state, the Department of Administration, as required by law, will prepare a report to be printed as an appendix to this bill.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Arney (D) , Bare (D) , Billings (D) , Brown (D) , DeSmidt (D) , Emerson (D) , Fitzgerald (D) , Haywood (D) , Joers (D) , Johnson (D) , Mayadev (D) , McCarville (D) , Palmeri (D) , Prado (D) , Rivera-Wagner (D) , Roe (D) , Sheehan (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spaude (D) , Stubbs (D) , Subeck (D) , Taylor (D) , Tenorio (D) , Udell (D)

10 cosponsors

Dassler-Alfheim (D) , Drake (D) , Habush Sinykin (D) , Hesselbein (D) , J. Jacobson (D) , L. Johnson (D) , Ratcliff (D) , Roys (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Wall (D)

Registered lobbying interests · 5

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Full history

  1. Dec 3, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Anderson, Joers, Arney, Bare, Billings, Brown, DeSmidt, Emerson, Fitzgerald, Johnson, Mayadev, McCarville, Palmeri, Rivera-Wagner, Roe, Sinicki, Sheehan, Spaude, Stubbs, Subeck, Taylor, Udell, Haywood, Prado and Tenorio; cosponsored by Senators Spreitzer, Dassler-Alfheim, Drake, Habush Sinykin, L. Johnson, Ratcliff, Roys, Wall and Hesselbein

  2. Dec 3, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means

  3. Dec 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 20, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a coauthor

  5. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1