Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 73

Vetoed Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets.

Alcohol and other drug abuse Alcohol beverage — Regulation Business Court Court — Fee Mental health Trade practice

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, stopped here
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill statutorily recognizes specialized dockets for treatment courts and for commercial cases. The bill recognizes in statute treatment courts, which are defined in the bill to include adult drug treatment court, juvenile drug treatment court, operating while intoxicated treatment court, mental health treatment court, family dependency treatment court, veterans treatment court, hybrid treatment court, and tribal healing to wellness court.

The bill also statutorily recognizes a specialized docket for commercial cases. Under the bill, the chief justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, taking into consideration recommendations from the relevant chief judges of the judicial administrative districts, must select circuit court judges who will be assigned to the commercial court docket upon each judge’s agreement to serve. The bill provides that a judge who presides over cases on the commercial court docket is not prohibited from working on any other assigned docket.

Under the bill, certain commercial case types must be assigned to the commercial court docket, including cases involving all of the following: 1) the governance or internal affairs of business organizations; 2) tortious or statutorily prohibited business activity, unfair competition, or antitrust claims; 3) the sale, consolidation, or merger of a business organization or the conversion, share exchange, or sale of substantially all of the assets of a business organization; 4) the issuance, sale, or transfer of securities; 5) intellectual property rights; 6) the relationship between a franchisor and franchisee or similar distribution relationship; 7) certain claims or disputes involving the Uniform Commercial Code, when the amount in controversy exceeds $100,000; 8) receiverships in excess of $250,000; 9) confirmation of arbitration awards and compelling or enforcing arbitration awards when the amount in controversy exceeds $100,000; and 10) real estate construction disputes when the amount in controversy exceeds $250,000. The bill provides that certain types of cases are ineligible for assignment to the commercial court docket, including small claims cases, cases involving a governmental entity or political subdivision seeking to enforce a statutory or regulatory restriction or prohibition, or disputes between landlords and tenants.

The commercial court docket created under the bill is a commercial case docket that generally involves disputes between commercial entities rather than individuals and does not include actions typically involving individuals such as personal injury suits, products liability, malpractice, or other tort claims or landlord and tenant disputes or similar claims. Under the bill, parties may jointly move for discretionary assignment of a case to the commercial court docket if the case is one that is not identified under the mandatory criteria but is not otherwise ineligible for assignment. The bill provides that a decision granting or denying a motion for a discretionary assignment of a case to the commercial court docket is final and nonappealable.

The bill also allows that parties to a case that is filed in a judicial administrative district that does not have a dedicated commercial court docket may, in certain circumstances, jointly petition for transfer of the case to a commercial court docket. Under the bill, no party may withdraw a request for transfer to the commercial court docket after a judicial assignment of the case has been made.

Sponsors

Introduced by: B. Jacobson (R) , Brooks (R) , Knodl (R) , Murphy (R) , O'Connor (R) , Tusler (R)

3 cosponsors

Dittrich (R) , Jacque (R) , Wimberger (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 5

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention, Ayes 7, Noes 2

Passed 7–2 Apr 15, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: PASSAGE

Passed 53–42 Apr 22, 2025 official source full page

Aye · 53

Nay · 42

Not voting · 2

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3

Passed 5–3 May 8, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 May 13, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 24, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tusler, B. Jacobson, Brooks, Knodl, Murphy and O'Connor; cosponsored by Senators Jacque and Wimberger

  2. Feb 24, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention

  3. Apr 1, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 1, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Dittrich added as a coauthor

  5. Apr 3, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention, Ayes 7, Noes 2

  7. Apr 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2025 by Committee on Rules

  9. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  10. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 42, Paired 2

  11. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  12. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 23, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Apr 24, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  16. May 8, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  17. May 8, 2025 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  18. May 8, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. May 13, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  20. May 13, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-15-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  21. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Roys, L. Johnson, Keyeski, Spreitzer, Habush Sinykin, Dassler-Alfheim, Smith, Drake, Larson, Carpenter, Wirch and Hesselbein

  22. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Point of order that Senate Amendment 1 was not germane well taken

  24. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Decision of the Chair stands as the judgment of the Senate, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  25. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  27. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  28. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. May 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  30. May 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-16-2025

  31. Aug 7, 2025 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 8-7-2025

  32. Aug 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-8-2025

  33. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  34. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82