Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 73

Statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets

Topics: Alcohol and other drug abuse, Business, Court, Mental health, Trade practice

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Aug 11, 2025. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 24, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 53 to 42

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 18 to 15

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Aug 11, 2025.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 80. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill statutorily recognizes specialized dockets for treatment courts and for commercial cases. The bill recognizes in statute treatment courts, which are defined in the bill to include adult drug treatment court, juvenile drug treatment court, operating while intoxicated treatment court, mental health treatment court, family dependency treatment court, veterans treatment court, hybrid treatment court, and tribal healing to wellness court.

The bill also statutorily recognizes a specialized docket for commercial cases. Under the bill, the chief justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, taking into consideration recommendations from the relevant chief judges of the judicial administrative districts, must select circuit court judges who will be assigned to the commercial court docket upon each judge’s agreement to serve. The bill provides that a judge who presides over cases on the commercial court docket is not prohibited from working on any other assigned docket.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, certain commercial case types must be assigned to the commercial court docket, including cases involving all of the following: 1) the governance or internal affairs of business organizations; 2) tortious or statutorily prohibited business activity, unfair competition, or antitrust claims; 3) the sale, consolidation, or merger of a business organization or the conversion, share exchange, or sale of substantially all of the assets of a business organization; 4) the issuance, sale, or transfer of securities; 5) intellectual property rights; 6) the relationship between a franchisor and franchisee or similar distribution relationship; 7) certain claims or disputes involving the Uniform Commercial Code, when the amount in controversy exceeds $100,000; 8) receiverships in excess of $250,000; 9) confirmation of arbitration awards and compelling or enforcing arbitration awards when the amount in controversy exceeds $100,000; and 10) real estate construction disputes when the amount in controversy exceeds $250,000. The bill provides that certain types of cases are ineligible for assignment to the commercial court docket, including small claims cases, cases involving a governmental entity or political subdivision seeking to enforce a statutory or regulatory restriction or prohibition, or disputes between landlords and tenants.

The commercial court docket created under the bill is a commercial case docket that generally involves disputes between commercial entities rather than individuals and does not include actions typically involving individuals such as personal injury suits, products liability, malpractice, or other tort claims or landlord and tenant disputes or similar claims. Under the bill, parties may jointly move for discretionary assignment of a case to the commercial court docket if the case is one that is not identified under the mandatory criteria but is not otherwise ineligible for assignment. The bill provides that a decision granting or denying a motion for a discretionary assignment of a case to the commercial court docket is final and nonappealable.

The bill also allows that parties to a case that is filed in a judicial administrative district that does not have a dedicated commercial court docket may, in certain circumstances, jointly petition for transfer of the case to a commercial court docket. Under the bill, no party may withdraw a request for transfer to the commercial court docket after a judicial assignment of the case has been made.

Who's behind it

6 representatives are its ⁠. All 6 are Republicans.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 9 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (3)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 2 · Apr 15, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention, Ayes 7, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 53 to 42 · Apr 22, 2025 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (53)

No (42)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 3 · May 8, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · May 13, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 18 to 15 · May 15, 2025

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “SHALL THE DECISION OF THE CHAIR STAND”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 18 to 15 · May 15, 2025

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Aug 11, 2025

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Aug 7, 2025

    Sent to the governor.

  4. May 15, 2025

    The Senate passed it too, 18 to 15.

  5. May 15, 2025

    “Point of order that Senate Amendment 1 was not germane well taken” (the official wording)

  6. May 13, 2025

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  7. May 8, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 3.

  8. Apr 24, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  9. Apr 23, 2025

    The Senate received it.

  10. Apr 22, 2025

    The Assembly passed it, 53 to 42.

  11. Apr 15, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Apr 15, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 2.

  13. Apr 1, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  14. Apr 1, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Feb 24, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention.

  16. Feb 24, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 24, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tusler, B. Jacobson, Brooks, Knodl, Murphy and O'Connor; cosponsored by Senators Jacque and Wimberger

  2. Feb 24, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention

  3. Apr 1, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 1, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Dittrich added as a coauthor

  5. Apr 3, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Mental Health and Substance Abuse Prevention, Ayes 7, Noes 2

  7. Apr 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2025 by Committee on Rules

  9. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 42, Paired 2

  13. Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Apr 23, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Apr 24, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  16. May 8, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  17. May 8, 2025 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  18. May 8, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. May 13, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  20. May 13, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-15-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  21. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Roys, L. Johnson, Keyeski, Spreitzer, Habush Sinykin, Dassler-Alfheim, Smith, Drake, Larson, Carpenter, Wirch and Hesselbein

  22. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Point of order that Senate Amendment 1 was not germane well taken

  24. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Decision of the Chair stands as the judgment of the Senate, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  25. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  27. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  28. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. May 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  30. May 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-16-2025

  31. Aug 7, 2025 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 8-7-2025

  32. Aug 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-8-2025

  33. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  34. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote