Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 75

Department of Justice collection and reporting of certain criminal case data. (FE)

Topics: Circuit court, Court: Procedure, Data processing, Justice, Department of, Privacy, Reports, State Courts, Director of

Became law

The governor signed it on Oct 31, 2025. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 28, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 54 to 43

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed May 15, 2025

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2025 Wisconsin Act 45

Latest entry in the official record, Oct 31, 2025: “Published 11-1-2025”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 115. That version died when the session ended.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires the Department of Justice to collect from the director of state courts all of the following information for each criminal case: 1) the county in which the case was filed; 2) the name of the prosecuting attorney assigned to the case; 3) the name of the court official assigned to the case; 4) the criminal charge filed; 5) the charging recommendation from the referring law enforcement agency, if applicable; 6) for each case, whether the court released the defendant without bail, upon the execution of an unsecured appearance bond, upon the execution of an appearance bond with sufficient solvent sureties, or upon the deposit of cash in lieu of sureties, or denied release, and the name of the court official who made the decision; 7) for each case for which a court required the execution of an appearance bond with sufficient solvent sureties, the monetary amount of the bond and the name of the court official who made the decision; 8) for each case for which a court required the deposit of cash in lieu of sureties, the monetary amount of cash required and the name of the court official who made the decision; 9) any other conditions of release imposed on the defendant and the name of the court official who made the decision; 10) whether any plea bargain was offered in the case; 11) whether a deferred prosecution agreement was offered in the case; 12) whether any charge relating to the case was dismissed; and 13) whether the case resulted in a conviction.

Under the bill, DOJ must annually report the information collected to the chief clerk of each house of the legislature for distribution to the appropriate standing committees, and must maintain a database on its website that contains the information in a searchable format, for a period of 10 years after a criminal charge is filed. Under the bill, DOJ must ensure that the information provided in the database does not contain a criminal defendant’s personally identifying information.

Who's behind it

8 representatives are its ⁠. All 8 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 14 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 1 · Mar 11, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 3, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 54 to 43 · Mar 13, 2025 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (54)

No (43)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · May 13, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Oct 31, 2025

    The new law was published.

  2. Oct 31, 2025

    The governor signed it. It became 2025 Wisconsin Act 45.

  3. Oct 29, 2025

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Sep 11, 2025

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  5. May 15, 2025

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. May 15, 2025

    The Senate passed it too.

  7. May 15, 2025

    The Senate adopted it.

  8. May 13, 2025

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  9. May 12, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  10. Apr 17, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Mar 14, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  12. Mar 13, 2025

    The Senate received it.

  13. Mar 13, 2025

    The Assembly passed it, 54 to 43.

  14. Mar 13, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Mar 11, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 1.

  16. Mar 4, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Mar 3, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  18. Feb 28, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

  19. Feb 28, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 28, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Donovan, Knodl, Moses, Mursau, O'Connor, Penterman, Wichgers and Rodriguez; cosponsored by Senators Hutton, Bradley, James, Nass and Tomczyk

  2. Feb 28, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Mar 3, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Maxey added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 4, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 10, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 3, Noes 1

  7. Mar 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to calendar of 3-13-2025 pursuant to Assembly Rule 45 (1)

  8. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 54, Noes 43

  13. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Mar 13, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Mar 14, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  16. Apr 17, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  17. May 12, 2025 · Senate

    Withdrawn from committee on Judiciary and Public Safety and rereferred to committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)

  18. May 12, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Hutton

  19. May 13, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  20. May 13, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-15-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  21. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  22. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  23. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  25. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended

  26. May 15, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. May 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 adopted)

  28. Sep 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Senate Amendment 1 concurred in

  29. Sep 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  30. Sep 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 9-16-2025

  31. Oct 29, 2025 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 10-29-2025

  32. Oct 31, 2025 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 10-31-2025. 2025 Wisconsin Act 45

  33. Oct 31, 2025 · Assembly

    Published 11-1-2025

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote