Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 808

A wetland assured delineation program, extending the time limit for emergency rule procedures, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Topics: Administrative rules, Natural Resources, Department of: Environmental protection, Wetland

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 23, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 798. That version became law.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill directs the Department of Natural Resources to establish a wetland assured delineation program.

Current law generally prohibits the discharge of dredged or fill material into a wetland unless a person is issued a wetland general permit or individual permit by DNR. Under current law, a person who owns or leases land may use the following methods to delineate the boundaries of a wetland in a manner recognized by DNR: 1) the person may request that DNR provide a wetland identification to determine if wetlands are located on a parcel, or part of a parcel, that does not exceed five acres; 2) the person may have a third person prepare a wetland delineation and request that DNR confirm the boundaries of the wetland as delineated by that third person, based on DNR’s on-site inspection of the land; or 3) with respect to nonfederal wetlands, the person may have a qualified third person perform a wetland identification delineating the boundaries of a wetland and request DNR to confirm those boundaries, not based upon an on-site inspection of the land but rather based on a review of maps, aerial photographs, surveys, wetland delineations, and hydrophytic soil conditions. Under current law, nonfederal wetlands are wetlands that are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government, and a qualified third person is an individual who has completed basic and advanced wetland training and has a minimum of one year of field experience in wetland delineation.

Read the full summary

The bill adds a wetland assured delineation program as a fourth method for delineating the boundaries of a wetland in a manner recognized by DNR. Under the program, a person may apply to DNR to be certified as an assured delineator. A wetland delineation prepared by an assured delineator has the same effect as a wetland identification or confirmation prepared by DNR, and a wetland delineation prepared by an assured delineator need not be confirmed by DNR. Under the bill, DNR must charge a $900 annual certification fee to an assured delineator, must require a report of each wetland delineation an assured delineator prepares, and may charge a filing fee not to exceed $20 for each report submitted.

The bill provides that a wetland delineation prepared by an assured delineator is effective for five years from the date upon which the wetland delineation report is submitted to DNR. This matches the general effective period for wetland identifications and confirmations of wetlands provided by DNR under current law. In an exception under current law, a wetland identification or confirmation provided by DNR is effective for 15 years from the date provided by DNR if the wetland is a nonfederal wetland and the parcel of land is subject to a storm water management zoning ordinance or a storm water discharge permit. The bill adds to this exception a wetland delineation by an assured delineator that meets these conditions, and changes this exception to be effective for 15 years from the date the U.S. army corps of engineers makes a determination regarding whether the wetland is subject to federal jurisdiction on the basis of the wetland identification, confirmation, or delineation.

The bill requires DNR to establish application and qualification requirements for assured delineator certification but includes some minimum requirements, such as certain educational degrees, specific amounts of full-time professional field experience in wetland delineation based on educational degree, and completion of a wetland delineation training course based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual. The bill also requires DNR to charge an application processing fee of $500. The bill provides that an applicant whose application is not approved may reapply and requires DNR to accept applications no less than annually and at least during the period beginning September 15 and ending November 30 for applicants who wish to be certified beginning on March 15 of the next calendar year.

The bill requires DNR to review the performance of assured delineators on a recurring basis and authorizes DNR to perform in-field audits of specific wetland delineations submitted by assured delineators in the 12 months preceding the beginning of the audit. The bill allows DNR to investigate any person’s complaint that an assured delineator may have failed to accurately identify wetlands on a property for which a report was submitted in the 12 months preceding the date of the complaint. If the data gathered in the investigation show substantial evidence that a wetland delineation was conducted in a manner not supported by the wetland delineation manual published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the bill requires DNR to so notify the assured delineator and require the assured delineator to correct the report. The bill provides that any deadline for DNR action with respect to a wetland general or individual permit is tolled on the date of that notification until the assured delineator submits a corrected report.

The bill prohibits DNR from using data gathered in the investigation to modify a wetland permit or exemption decision solely on the basis of that data. The bill allows DNR to use data gathered in the investigation to evaluate an assured delineator’s compliance with assured delineation program requirements.

The bill allows DNR to revoke a person’s certification as an assured delineator if it finds the person did any of a list of actions, for example knowingly falsifying or misrepresenting a wetland boundary. Under the bill, a person whose assured delineator certification has been revoked is entitled to a contested case hearing.

Under the bill, DNR must consider a person who is approved or certified as an assured delineator under an existing pilot program as certified as an assured delineator under the program created in the bill.

Who's behind it

9 representatives are its ⁠. 7 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 16 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Environment vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 1 · Jan 30, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Environment vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 0 · Jan 30, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Environment, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 18, 2026

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  3. Jan 30, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Jan 30, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.

  5. Jan 29, 2026

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Jan 21, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Jan 21, 2026

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  8. Jan 7, 2026

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Dec 23, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Environment.

  10. Dec 23, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 23, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Mursau, Behnke, Doyle, Goeben, Green, Knodl, McCarville, Steffen and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Felzkowski, Jacque, Dassler-Alfheim and Feyen

  2. Dec 23, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Environment

  3. Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 16, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Mursau

  5. Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Snodgrass added as a coauthor

  6. Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Jan 29, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Jan 29, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Miresse added as a coauthor

  9. Jan 30, 2026 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 1

  10. Jan 30, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Environment, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  11. Jan 30, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:24 PM on 2-18-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 13

  13. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Neubauer

  14. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Senator Ratcliff added as a cosponsor

  15. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  16. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote