Assembly Bill 818
Demonstration charter school operators. (FE)
Topics: Public Instruction, Department of, School: Charter school, School: State aid, University of Wisconsin
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 6, 2026
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 818. That version died when the session ended.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the director of the Office of Educational Opportunity in the University of Wisconsin System may authorize a charter school. A charter school authorized by the OEO director is often referred to as an independent charter school. Under current law, the Department of Public Instruction pays the operator of an independent charter school an annual per pupil amount set by law. The per pupil amount for the 2025-26 school year is $12,369. This bill authorizes the OEO director to designate an operator of a charter school authorized by the director as a demonstration public school operator and requires DPI to pay an additional $6,863 per pupil to an operator of a charter school that receives this designation.
Under the bill, to be designated as an demonstration public school operator, an independent charter school operator must demonstrate to the OEO director that it meets specific criteria, including that for each of its charter schools authorized by the OEO, the operator participates in a longitudinal study; provides professional development opportunities; disseminates best practices from its educational model to other schools; and establishes and maintains partnerships with community organizations. Under the bill, the OEO director must respond to a request for such a designation from an independent charter school operator within 30 days and must include in the response the OEO director’s decision on whether to make the designation and if the director will not make the designation, the reason for not doing so. If the OEO director designates an independent charter school operator as a demonstration public school operator, the OEO director must state the term of the designation, which may not be more than five school years and must begin on a July 1. The designation may be renewed for additional terms. Lastly, for a designated public school operator to qualify for the increased per pupil payment amount for pupils attending an independent charter school authorized by the OEO, the operator and the OEO director must incorporate into the contract for the charter school a requirement for the operator to continue to comply with the eligibility criteria for a demonstration public school operator and a requirement for the operator to submit annual reports to DPI, the Joint Committee on Finance, and the senate and assembly education committees. Under the bill, the OEO director must annually provide to DPI the name of each demonstration public school operator and each charter school operated by the demonstration public school operator that qualifies for the increased per pupil payment in the following school year.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, the per pupil amount paid to an independent charter school is adjusted annually. The annual adjustment is an amount equal to the sum of any per member revenue limit increase that applies to school districts in that school year and any per member increase in categorical aids between the current school year and the previous school year. Under the bill, beginning in the 2026-27 school year, the additional $6,863 per pupil payment for a charter school that is designated as a demonstration public school is adjusted in the same manner as the standard per pupil payment amount.
Finally, the bill specifies that the additional per pupil payment for a demonstration public school is not included for purposes of reductions made to state aid received by school districts for payments to independent charter schools.
Who's behind it
5 representatives are its . 4 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 9 names Hide the names
Authors (5)
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Shelia Stubbs · Democrat, Assembly
- Bob Wittke · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (4)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Republican, Senate
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Clint Moses · Republican, Assembly
- Patrick Testin · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote to recommend it
Passed, 6 to 5 · Feb 10, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2026
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Feb 10, 2026
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 10, 2026
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 5.
-
Feb 3, 2026
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 28, 2026
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jan 28, 2026
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 26, 2026
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 7, 2026
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jan 6, 2026
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities.
-
Jan 6, 2026
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 6, 2026 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Wittke, Stubbs, Dittrich, Murphy and O'Connor; cosponsored by Senators Cabral-Guevara and Testin
- Jan 6, 2026 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Colleges and Universities
- Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Knodl added as a coauthor
- Jan 26, 2026 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 28, 2026 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 28, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Moses added as a coauthor
- Feb 3, 2026 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 5
- Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote