Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 903

Termination of parental rights under the safe haven law. (FE)

Topics: Children: Protection and services, County: Human services, District attorney, Maternal and infant care

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Apr 3, 2026. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 23, 2026

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 19, 2026

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 17, 2026

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Apr 3, 2026.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 893. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a parent may relinquish a newborn child who is 72 hours old or younger to a law enforcement officer, emergency medical services practitioner, or hospital staff member, and that person is required to protect the health and safety of the child and deliver the child to the intake worker for the juvenile court. Once the child is in the custody of the intake worker, the juvenile court must determine whether to continue to hold the newborn child in custody and, within 30 days of that determination, to establish a permanency plan for the child that ensures a placement or home for the child that provides long-term stability. Under current law, the juvenile court may terminate parental rights of the parents of a child who has been relinquished. This law is commonly referred to as the safe haven law.

Under this bill, the district attorney, corporation counsel, or other official designated by a county is required to file a petition to terminate the parental rights of a relinquished newborn child or, if a petition has already been filed, to join the petition. Under the bill, the petition must be filed in the county in which the relinquishment occurred no sooner than 30 days after the date on which the child was relinquished and no later than 60 days after the date on which the juvenile court found probable cause to believe that the child was relinquished.

Who's behind it

10 representatives are its ⁠. 9 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Children and Families vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 0 · Feb 11, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Children and Families, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Children and Families vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 3 · Feb 11, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Children and Families, Ayes 6, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Mental Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 11, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Apr 3, 2026

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Apr 2, 2026

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 17, 2026

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 11, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  6. Mar 3, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Feb 25, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families.

  8. Feb 23, 2026

    The Senate received it.

  9. Feb 19, 2026

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. Feb 19, 2026

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Feb 11, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Feb 11, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 3.

  13. Feb 10, 2026

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Feb 5, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Jan 23, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Children and Families.

  16. Jan 23, 2026

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Moses, Dittrich, Doyle, Gundrum, Hurd, Knodl, Maxey, Nedweski, O'Connor and Piwowarczyk; cosponsored by Senators James and Jacque

  2. Jan 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Children and Families

  3. Feb 5, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Moses

  5. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Children and Families, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  8. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Children and Families, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  9. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:44 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14

  11. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  13. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 23, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Feb 25, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families

  19. Mar 3, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  20. Mar 11, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  21. Mar 11, 2026 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  22. Mar 11, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  23. Mar 16, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  24. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Read a second time

  25. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  27. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  28. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Mar 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  30. Mar 20, 2026 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-20-2026

  31. Apr 2, 2026 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026

  32. Apr 3, 2026 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 4-3-2026

  33. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  34. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote